Mafiascum.net

Lets run this down;
Pope hasn't been scumhunting
Pope deflects all suspicion whenever possible instead of directly responding to it
Pope OMGUSes and uses associatives without flips to push scum reads and line up lynches

This is textbook newbscum. Pope is newb. Ergo, Pope is scum.

Ok lets see if nacho agrees

In post 425, Vegito wrote:Lets run this down;
Pope hasn't been scumhunting
Pope deflects all suspicion whenever possible instead of directly responding to it
Pope OMGUSes and uses associatives without flips to push scum reads and line up lynches

This is textbook newbscum. Pope is newb. Ergo, Pope is scum.

And you tunneling is scumhunting? What are you smoking Vegito?
And when have I not answered your questions?
Answering everything with "Lol" is useless,
And according to your logic:
Potatoes have skin
Vegito has skin
Therefore, Vegito is a potato

You're not being very convincing, bro.

In post 427, TheIrishPope wrote:

In post 425, Vegito wrote:Lets run this down;
Pope hasn't been scumhunting
Pope deflects all suspicion whenever possible instead of directly responding to it
Pope OMGUSes and uses associatives without flips to push scum reads and line up lynches

This is textbook newbscum. Pope is newb. Ergo, Pope is scum.

And you tunneling is scumhunting? What are you smoking Vegito?

Where have I been tunneling? I don't think you understand that word; you've been the one tunneling here.

In post 427, TheIrishPope wrote:And when have I not answered your questions?

Not just mine, everyone's. Such as here, where you deflect all accusations of why you're scummy into "no that's not a real scummy thing" "no that doesn't work" "only if they copy me!" which aren't responses to the problems being raised.

In post 427, TheIrishPope wrote: Answering everything with "Lol" is useless,

Why?

In post 427, TheIrishPope wrote: And according to your logic:
Potatoes have skin
Vegito has skin
Therefore, Vegito is a potato

You're not being very convincing, bro.

False.

The argument you're positing is the following:
YZ have Z
X has Y
----
X is YZ

The argument I'm positing is the following:
X has YZ.
X is Y.
---
X is YZ.

Or, in a form you may understand;
If you were not a newb, you could logically not be newbscum. But , and , it is logical to ascertain .

In post 411, Bacde wrote:hey you guys are still ignoring ghostlin

thats the best place to look right now

Pope can wait

Is your case for voting ghostlin purely the vengeful thing?

*In the first above syllogism, replace Y with Z in the minor premise.

In post 430, Vegito wrote:*In the first above syllogism, replace Y with Z in the minor premise.

This makes me want to lynch you.

Did someone not like their logic class?

In post 432, Vegito wrote:Did someone not like their logic class?

I wouldn't do what I do professionally if I hated logic.

The reason it makes me want to lynch you is because as I said the last time you applied symbolic logic to a player's informal English, it's irrelevant to what the person is trying to say. And you were all yeah no it still applies.

You were scum in that game, so now I want to lynch you. And you know what else? Nacho dropped his tell!

VOTE: Vegito

He applied the logical argument first, so cool story Ms. I-Don't-Read.

Jesus Christ are you saying you are not tunneling?
VOTE: Vegito
I think my vote will be more useful here.

^ And you think your vote is better suited on me than this, Ffery?

Yeah, avoiding what I just said about tunneling is not town. Ergo you are scum.
Who's your partner?

Now you're just outright lying.

In post 428, Vegito wrote:Where have I been tunneling? I don't think you understand that word; you've been the one tunneling here.

When you flip scum, I expect an apology from every town player in this game.

In post 436, Vegito wrote:^ And you think your vote is better suited on me than this, Ffery?

TIP would be a policy vote and I consider policy voting to be a last resort. I was giving ghostlin some serious consideration despite Nacho's tell before you let loose with the symbolic logic.

UNVOTE: vegito

I just noticed that TIP put you at L-1. I'm not happy with that. ATM I intend to put my vote back, but I want more discussion with Nacho before I do that.

Vegito, when you flip scum (because you will be lynched), I expect an apology from you.
PEdit: That was L-1? Really? I thought only two of us were voting.

according to the last vote count, there were already 2 votes. I didn't want some idiot hammering while I looked for unvotes.

In post 429, fferyllt wrote:

In post 411, Bacde wrote:hey you guys are still ignoring ghostlin

thats the best place to look right now

Pope can wait

Is your case for voting ghostlin purely the vengeful thing?

yes

I don't think you appreciate how ridiculously scummy the vengeful thing is

Well, Bacde, we know Vegito and Ghostlin are the scum, but it's better to eliminate Vegito now since he is more active.

No

we eliminate Ghostlin now because I'm 100%

In post 442, fferyllt wrote:according to the last vote count, there were already 2 votes. I didn't want some idiot hammering while I looked for unvotes.

let me know before you put anyone else at L-1

I'm serious

you need to vote for Ghostlin

Bacde, I understand your confidence, and I'm pretty sure Ghostlin is scum, but why didn't you vote him when I was voting him?

In post 441, TheIrishPope wrote:Vegito, when you flip scum (because you will be lynched), I expect an apology from you.
PEdit: That was L-1? Really? I thought only two of us were voting.

why would scum apologize for playing to their win condition?

In post 446, Bacde wrote:

In post 442, fferyllt wrote:according to the last vote count, there were already 2 votes. I didn't want some idiot hammering while I looked for unvotes.

let me know before you put anyone else at L-1

I'm serious

you need to vote for Ghostlin

My vote was L-2, so I'm not sure why you are scolding me.