Page 18 of 79

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:36 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 422, MonkeyMan576 wrote:All vote counts will be reset.
VOTE: roflcopter

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:59 pm
by Nobody Special
Vote: zoidberg

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:12 pm
by Psyche
:/

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:13 pm
by Desperado
Vote: Zoidberg

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:14 pm
by Psyche
Uh. So we should avoid talking about our recent loss..?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:16 pm
by Desperado
I'm struggling to find anything interesting to say about it. You have anything?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:17 pm
by Psyche
In post 402, Psyche wrote:No one has presented any compelling justification for a zoidberg lynch besides "oh he said these things that only scum could confidently say".

But this would mean zoidberg has repeatedly forgotten that his faction has information that the town does not. What kind of fool do you take him for?

Zoidberg has identified for the town many instances of actually legitimately scummy behaviors, suggesting to me that he is not only town, but very protown. I'm still mildly surprised that the case on him is being taken seriously.
Several of you seem be avoiding a straightforward discourse on the zoidberg issue. That is antitown.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:20 pm
by Psyche
In post 430, Desperado wrote:I'm struggling to find anything interesting to say about it. You have anything?
Based on the target and the timing, I think we have a dayvig among us who found BRO's slip really scummy and didn't want to talk about it. :/

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:21 pm
by Nobody Special
I've already explained my reason for Zoidberg. Iso me if you want to read it.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
by Zoidberg
In post 428, Desperado wrote:
Vote: Zoidberg
Hey.

You should wagon roflcopter with me for a bit. You can always go back to my wagon after roflcopter stops dodging questions.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
by Psyche
In post 433, Nobody Special wrote:I've already explained my reason for Zoidberg. Iso me if you want to read it.
This is
not
proactive discourse.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:25 pm
by EddieFenix
In post 432, Psyche wrote:
In post 430, Desperado wrote:I'm struggling to find anything interesting to say about it. You have anything?
Based on the target and the timing, I think we have a dayvig among us who found BRO's slip really scummy and didn't want to talk about it. :/
So, could we have a paranoid vig on our hands because he might have been sniffing in the right area?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:27 pm
by Psyche
okay let's try this
In post 284, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 258, TiphaineDeath wrote: Hey I just caught something. Zoidberg called a three man scumteam. Three. In most games of this size there are likely to be four or even five scum unless there is multiball or an SK or overpowered scum or such. The only way zoid knows there are three is if he is one of them.
My previous post was a poorly-worded prod dodge. Sorry.

I agree with the above, and Zoidberg saying "IT WAS TROLLING GUYZ HONEST!!!1" is pure bullshit.

Vote: Zoidberg
NS, why do you agree with TD?

NS, why do you think Zoidberg's explanation for his speculation was dubious?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:27 pm
by Nobody Special
Psyche: Tell me what you're looking for, then.

Eddie: ......what?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:32 pm
by Nobody Special
In post 437, Psyche wrote:okay let's try this
In post 284, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 258, TiphaineDeath wrote: Hey I just caught something. Zoidberg called a three man scumteam. Three. In most games of this size there are likely to be four or even five scum unless there is multiball or an SK or overpowered scum or such. The only way zoid knows there are three is if he is one of them.
My previous post was a poorly-worded prod dodge. Sorry.

I agree with the above, and Zoidberg saying "IT WAS TROLLING GUYZ HONEST!!!1" is pure bullshit.

Vote: Zoidberg
NS, why do you agree with TD?

NS, why do you think Zoidberg's explanation for his speculation was dubious?
I agree with TD because I have been in Large games with one scumteam, and Large games that were multiball. If the site meta is trending toward only Large multiball games, I've yet to see it.

Zoidberg was so specific about a three-man scumteam that it just feels as though he has knowledge; in other words, it ain't idle speculation, the way he presented it.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:34 pm
by EddieFenix
In post 438, Nobody Special wrote:Psyche: Tell me what you're looking for, then.

Eddie: ......what?
Oh the crazy theories that run thru my brain is all.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:49 pm
by Skullduggery
Man, not again. I just died in a game that had day-kills.

BROseidon...yeah, I got nothin' here. He only made four posts and didn't really do much of anything. I can think of half a dozen better vig targets.
In post 408, Psyche wrote:you're wallposting on a mafiascum.net thread
You think I'm wall-posting? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

If you want me to wall-post, I can wall-post. I can wall-post like a champ until the entire player list hates my guts. You see, I don't live my life with the Internet hooked up to my veins like an IV, so I'm not online 24/7 to respond to every little thing that comes up. I generally just check this site once or twice a day, during which time I address all the topics of interest that sprang up since my last post. I try to keep it as concise as I can -- one or two sentences/questions per quote whenever possible. If that's what you call wall-posting, then I have bad news for you, my friend: you don't know what wall-posting is. You should be thankful that I'm not wall-posting.
In post 440, EddieFenix wrote:Oh the crazy theories that run thru my brain is all.
No, no, don't brush it off so quickly. You think BRO was killed because he was "sniffing in the right area"? Let's explore that. He was suspicious of Pope, but he certainly wasn't the only one. Why do you think he was enough of a threat to warrant such a sudden demise? Share your crazy theories with us.

Also:

VOTE: roflcopter

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:58 pm
by TheIrishPope
Well shit
Alright
Skull, I was merely referring to the rofl wagon, which I don't understand
You should all vote Varsoon because he's, you know, scum
VOTE: Varsoon

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:11 pm
by Psyche
In post 439, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 437, Psyche wrote:okay let's try this
In post 284, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 258, TiphaineDeath wrote: Hey I just caught something. Zoidberg called a three man scumteam. Three. In most games of this size there are likely to be four or even five scum unless there is multiball or an SK or overpowered scum or such. The only way zoid knows there are three is if he is one of them.
My previous post was a poorly-worded prod dodge. Sorry.

I agree with the above, and Zoidberg saying "IT WAS TROLLING GUYZ HONEST!!!1" is pure bullshit.

Vote: Zoidberg
NS, why do you agree with TD?

NS, why do you think Zoidberg's explanation for his speculation was dubious?
I agree with TD because I have been in Large games with one scumteam, and Large games that were multiball. If the site meta is trending toward only Large multiball games, I've yet to see it.
The important part of TD's post is where he suggests that Zoid must be scum because he speculated about the setup. I do not care about the site meta.
Zoidberg was so specific about a three-man scumteam that it just feels as though he has knowledge; in other words, it ain't idle speculation, the way he presented it.
In what ways was he specific in a way that was scummy?

Remember that you can't just talk about what feels unless you can make me feels.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:13 pm
by Psyche
In post 441, Skullduggery wrote:
In post 408, Psyche wrote:you're wallposting on a mafiascum.net thread
You think I'm wall-posting? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

If you want me to wall-post, I can wall-post. I can wall-post like a champ until the entire player list hates my guts. You see, I don't live my life with the Internet hooked up to my veins like an IV, so I'm not online 24/7 to respond to every little thing that comes up. I generally just check this site once or twice a day, during which time I address all the topics of interest that sprang up since my last post. I try to keep it as concise as I can -- one or two sentences/questions per quote whenever possible. If that's what you call wall-posting, then I have bad news for you, my friend: you don't know what wall-posting is. You should be thankful that I'm not wall-posting.
Uh. Why are you so edgy about wall-posting?

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:19 pm
by EddieFenix
In post 441, Skullduggery wrote:
In post 440, EddieFenix wrote:Oh the crazy theories that run thru my brain is all.
No, no, don't brush it off so quickly. You think BRO was killed because he was "sniffing in the right area"? Let's explore that. He was suspicious of Pope, but he certainly wasn't the only one. Why do you think he was enough of a threat to warrant such a sudden demise? Share your crazy theories with us.
Either

A.) He was on the right track somewhere and someone got paranoid that he was digging in the right area. So they (someone from either a neutral stand point or a mafia stand point) decided to bury him before he got wise

OR

B.) He got the axe to cause chaos within the game. A random shot in the dark from a vig to cause a vote reset and then we start the party all over again.

Theories/Thoughts is all they are for NOW... But, it is something to ISO his lone 4 posts for to dig into. See who responded to him and how.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:21 pm
by Psyche
Um, if you'll remember, BRO was censured for the contradiction in his wallpost concering voting VIs. Some townie might have taken that as a scumslip and then vigged.

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:24 pm
by Dante
lol

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:27 pm
by Metal Sonic
at least the vig didn't kill a Pr

so ok

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:32 pm
by TheIrishPope
How the FUCK can you guys think the Vig was Town?