Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 3:13 pm
Why me fry me.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I didn't read the previous page, but lolIn post 425, fuzzybutternut wrote:Why me fry me.
No, we're asking you to contribute. You're doing fine.In post 415, toxic-banana wrote: You're asking the noob to organise the discussion?
What difference does it make for youIn post 430, GuyInFreezer wrote:my bad guys I forgot that this is mafia thread and not a site chat.
Whats so wrong with not taking compromises?In post 361, Sakura Hana wrote:Yeah and i got the same feeling about you now that N1395 ended
VOTE: FSnake
Because he seems very reluctant to compromise or take stances
I got a similar feel on banana where his posts seem like they say something but in the end say nothing, but it could be attributed to the fact that he's a newbie and doesn't know how to contribute, anyone got more thoughts on this?
This is complaining about a guy complaining about a guy complaining. Hardly a scum tell. Like a lot of your accusations against Fuzzy, Bert, or Saki.In post 365, Sakura Hana wrote: - Complaining about a guy Complaining.
Because only town can have conviction? And it cant be faked? What? Bad reason for a read. Soooo generic.In post 376, Timeater wrote:sorry, forgot i'm going to have to spell everything out in this game. gif and tne are obvious town. there is no way in a thousand hells gif is this chittery-chattery as mafia throwing out townreads left and right trying to organize the discussion, no way he's that ballsy no way he's that good. he's town, his genuineness just reeks. as for tne, its sort of the same. usually people who have extremely strong convinctions and tend to think they are right all the time are town.
sakura might actually be scum considering that response, need to think about it more
wat.In post 435, fuzzybutternut wrote:TMS. NER.
is that the only thing you have to say about the game DPIn post 436, DoctorPepper wrote:Whats so wrong with not taking compromises?In post 361, Sakura Hana wrote:Yeah and i got the same feeling about you now that N1395 ended
VOTE: FSnake
Because he seems very reluctant to compromise or take stances
I got a similar feel on banana where his posts seem like they say something but in the end say nothing, but it could be attributed to the fact that he's a newbie and doesn't know how to contribute, anyone got more thoughts on this?
This is complaining about a guy complaining about a guy complaining. Hardly a scum tell. Like a lot of your accusations against Fuzzy, Bert, or Saki.In post 365, Sakura Hana wrote: - Complaining about a guy Complaining.
Also the Bert/Saki interactions are too blatant to be scum together imo.
Because only town can have conviction? And it cant be faked? What? Bad reason for a read. Soooo generic.In post 376, Timeater wrote:sorry, forgot i'm going to have to spell everything out in this game. gif and tne are obvious town. there is no way in a thousand hells gif is this chittery-chattery as mafia throwing out townreads left and right trying to organize the discussion, no way he's that ballsy no way he's that good. he's town, his genuineness just reeks. as for tne, its sort of the same. usually people who have extremely strong convinctions and tend to think they are right all the time are town.
sakura might actually be scum considering that response, need to think about it more
More votes on this guy please
really, DP?In post 439, DoctorPepper wrote:Pretty much, not much has happened while I was gone
ill play like i usually play too lolIn post 440, Sakura Hana wrote:*sigh*
Guess my notes suck then.
I'll just play like I usually play instead.
VOTE: Saki
@DP: Too blatant to be scum together? really? By your logic the perfect scum strategy is to be as obviously scum as possible.
Which is exactly why it's a valid strategy.In post 443, DoctorPepper wrote:Scum really wouldnt risk being seen like that, imo.
wifom opIn post 445, Sakura Hana wrote:Which is exactly why it's a valid strategy.In post 443, DoctorPepper wrote:Scum really wouldnt risk being seen like that, imo.