Mini 1508 ~ Tales of uPick ~ Error

ISO · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:23 am

@ffery: I really shouldn't have to.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:23 am

Because "Italics"

ISO · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:24 am

In post 424, notscience wrote:Why are you dismissing me as town when I could have looked here for the rules

But you didn't do that, you looked in your role PM.

ISO · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:25 am

@Mod: This is why you do sample town PMs

Sakura Hana · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:26 am

In post 428, borkjerfkin wrote:@Mod: This is why you do sample town PMs

Pretty much, now ns is conftown from my PoV.

notscience · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:27 am

Son of a bitch lets not make me conftown

Sakura Hana · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:28 am

In post 430, notscience wrote:Son of a bitch lets not make me conftown

If you really want to, but I will not vote you for the remainder of this game. You already townslipped that's enough for me.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:29 am

This also means bork is town btw.

notscience · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:29 am

Bork can we be in-thread masons

Natirasha · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:30 am

ISO · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:31 am

I'm a mason, you're a mason, Sakura's a mason

fferyllt · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:38 am

In post 425, borkjerfkin wrote:@ffery: I really shouldn't have to.

I thought you guys were talking about flavor.

This role pm clearing stuff is shitty and dangerous IMO. We shouldn't assume that scum didn't get a copy of the town win condition or a vanilla role pm or w/e.

notscience · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:38 am

In post 436, fferyllt wrote:
In post 425, borkjerfkin wrote:@ffery: I really shouldn't have to.
I thought you guys were talking about flavor.

This role pm clearing stuff is shitty and dangerous IMO. We shouldn't assume that scum didn't get a copy of the town win condition or a vanilla role pm or w/e.

IAWTP

ISO · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:41 am

I agree that it's shitty and wasn't what I was going for, I was attempting just to talk about flavor, but this just kinda happened and I'm not sure how I'd have ignored it.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:31 am

In post 436, fferyllt wrote:We shouldn't assume that scum didn't get a copy of the town win condition or a vanilla role pm or w/e.

Why assume this after the mod added the win condition to the OP specifically after what Cabd did?

Natirasha · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:36 am

Cabd why so quiet about these gamebreaking maneuvers?

Cabd · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:37 am

In post 440, Natirasha wrote:Cabd why so quiet about these gamebreaking maneuvers?

Well given I woke up about half an hour ago, I haven't made my rounds to this one yet. What specifically are you asking me? I think bork fairly covered what was stated.

Cabd · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:37 am

If anything I expect scum to be the ones upset because town is essentially getting free innocent children.

Natirasha · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:39 am

Okay, yeah, that was an unfair question, I apologize. Agree on the second point, though.

fferyllt · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:40 am

In post 439, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 436, fferyllt wrote:We shouldn't assume that scum didn't get a copy of the town win condition or a vanilla role pm or w/e.
Why assume this after the mod added the win condition to the OP specifically after what Cabd did?

Because I've modded a ton of mafia games, and I know how to mod-wifom the everloving shit out of addendums to the opening info.

Cabd · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:41 am

In post 444, fferyllt wrote:
In post 439, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 436, fferyllt wrote:We shouldn't assume that scum didn't get a copy of the town win condition or a vanilla role pm or w/e.
Why assume this after the mod added the win condition to the OP specifically after what Cabd did?
Because I've modded a ton of mafia games, and I know how to mod-wifom the everloving shit out of addendums to the opening info.

No offense intended to CSL, but he's not really capible of muddying the waters with his modding, if anything he telegraphs his every move.

Natirasha · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:42 am

In post 444, fferyllt wrote:Because I've modded a ton of mafia games, and I know how to mod-wifom the everloving shit out of addendums to the opening info.

Let's just say I am not entirely sure Feirei does.

Natirasha · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:42 am

EBWOP: Lol Cabd

Sakura Hana · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:45 am

In post 446, Natirasha wrote:
In post 444, fferyllt wrote:Because I've modded a ton of mafia games, and I know how to mod-wifom the everloving shit out of addendums to the opening info.
Let's just say I am not entirely sure Feirei does.

Ditto.

Cabd · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:46 am

Ffery and notsci really ought to be leveraging themselves as inthread masons. I wonder if ffery has figured out the code present I sent her yet.