Mafiascum.net

Oh wait I read that wrong

I thought you were going to check your posts for length when you were really going to check his question.

In post 353, Wake1 wrote:

Mr_Blonde

You've only posted three times. In general I read pro-dodges as slightly Scummy. Him taking issue with Lucky's dice gimmick reads sort of opportunistic, so slight Scum read on that (254), too. I don't particularly understand his vote on Aptil, but I do await his upcoming posts. Right now I have him as slightly Leaning-Scum.

In post 383, Mr_Blonde wrote:@ Wake - which statement of mine regarding Aptil did you not understand? I actually like the ISO you did on me, the conclusion you did gives me a fairly strong town read for you. I, too, often rely on objective tells such as your prod-dodge annoyance for finding scum. It's never anything particularly solid for lynching someone, but it helps me diagnose players a bit more.

So besides DBK's sheeping of ETL, what else have we got on him that's lynch-worthy?

It's probably the way it was worded. It looks like your reason for voting Aptil was because he voted Lucky, because Lucky didn't vote some based on previous content, considering Aptil hadn't as well. If I'm not understanding that correctly, please clarify. If I did read it right, then I'm wondering why Aptil's vote deserved a vote, when it seemed Lucky had made multiple posts that weren't helpful. The only reason I defended Lucky from ETL was for his very first joke post she had turned into a mountain.

That's basically the gist of it. Aptil's vote at the time was on you though, as it has been since D1 started, it's not like voted Lucky afterwards. His vote wasn't the issue, it was him calling out Lucky for voting randomly at the time when there were other people to potentially look at when he himself wasn't actively partaking. In short: hypocrisy.

Not sure what point you were making by bringing up the Lucky/ETL thing about him voting MS for his opener.

In post 418, Mr_Blonde wrote:

In post 407, Cheery Dog wrote:

In post 394, Does Bo Know wrote:^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.

Yep DBK is still scum.

Looks like you need to make a new friend since etl noticed your sheeping.

What gives you the scum read on DBK?

Well there's still his reaction to bb's gambit which caused me to cast my vote, then it's been staying there with the trying to get reactions out of people possibly going to join a wagon. - if people want to vote someone a wagon shouldn't effect anything - where I believe he was possibly looking for an easy lynch of gam on the grounds he is new to the game.

Also there's the etl buddying, which with the post I'm just quoted with him congratulating you on apparently knowing what was up (aka reading him as town like he'd like), it's liking for a potential town member to protect him.

Lol no. Lynching Gam?

There was no way in hell I would've let a Gam lynch go through. There clearly wasn't enough evidence to actually convict him, and anyone that thought otherwise was ludicrous.

In post 420, Wake1 wrote:

In post 417, Kalimar wrote: I need to put some effort in to reading the higher volume posters at some point, but I can already tell with Wake it's going to be hard.

Skimming, I noticed this.

Wake: 69 < DKB: 119

Fifty post difference.

And what is your plan with this "information"?

What about his reaction to the gambit was scummy to you? His vote was already on Wake at the time before BB revealed his 'guilty' and later he PMed the MOD to clarify whether or not players would have N0 abilities despite the Wiki stating the PRs would be given for Ns 1-5. Looks pretty Town to me. He also states that he had a feeling BB was pulling a gambit and didn't out him immediately in order to see Wake's reaction. Also Pro-Town IMO.

In post 430, Does Bo Know wrote:Lol no. Lynching Gam?

There was no way in hell I would've let a Gam lynch go through. There clearly wasn't enough evidence to actually convict him, and anyone that thought otherwise was ludicrous.

Preparing his lynch for a later day then.

What the hell?

I kept screaming about getting on the Game wagon. Not the lynch.

21 - wanting to assume that anyone creating something outside the norm is scum faking. Even of it was a conspiracy thought.

Also the revelation of the mod's answer about night 0 actions.

---

Wagon => lynch.

So RVS wagon => ?

Please tell me Cheery's not the only one that assumes I secretly wanted a lynch on Gam.

Because srsly

In post 435, Cheery Dog wrote:21 - wanting to assume that anyone creating something outside the norm is scum faking. Even of it was a conspiracy thought.

Also the revelation of the mod's answer about night 0 actions.

---

Wagon => lynch.

wut

In post 413, Smudger wrote:hmmm, Hypothetically how do you think you would react, as town that is.

Depends whether he thought the claim was real or fake. His reaction fits with "Oh, this kid is just reaction testing me."

In post 416, aptil wrote:Quick question : Is BBMolla the same person on westeros mafia board ?

Yes

Hmm

BBmolla what do you think of Cheery right now? I know you entertained that Zebe + Aptil were two of them, but considering he's back and playing, do you have any opinions of him? Do you think he could be the "X" as the third on the scum team?

I always think Cheery is wrong as fuck and it's no exception here.

Could he be scum? Sure, possibly.

I'd down with a Cherry wagon.

EBWOP: I'd be down**

In post 445, Mr_Blonde wrote:I'd down with a Cherry wagon.

Hmm

Why?

His stance on you regarding BB's gambit. I seriously don't see how he came to that conclusion when reading the same posts.

Additionally I'm reading both you and Wake as town, so considering you are both the 2 largest trains I think we should turn elsewhere.