Mafiascum.net

lol. I was literally posting a vote bulba when 424 came up in p-edit. And the post wrecks my ostensible reason for making the vote. Will think on it a bit.

Bulbs post is good. Svens case on Vezok is scummy as hell.

In post 423, AngryPidgeon wrote:Sven scum read still going strong.

Now who was bussing him.

In post 424, Bulbazak wrote:

In post 400, Svenskt Stål wrote:

In post 370, vezokpiraka wrote:

vote majiffy

Still scum.

In post 372, Svenskt Stål wrote:and if you could sum up your scum read on majiffy that would be dandy

In post 373, vezokpiraka wrote:

In post 372, Svenskt Stål wrote:and if you could sum up your scum read on majiffy that would be dandy

When the posts come back I will try to do this.
Strong town reads: mastin and dopog.
Townish : Toog.

As for everybody else I haven't made an opinion just yet.

In post 374, Svenskt Stål wrote:what makes dopog town

also you should be able from memory say what you didnt like regardning majiffy

In post 375, vezokpiraka wrote:

In post 374, Svenskt Stål wrote:what makes dopog town

also you should be able from memory say what you didnt like regardning majiffy

It was a gut read. I mean I read and I thought it was scummy cause of something that rubbed me the wrong way.

I don't remember what exactly.

"

Still scum.

" alot of strength, vezok backs this strength up with not remembering what sparked it, but still felt the need to revote

chooo chooo

Wow. You

are

scum.

In post 419, Svenskt Stål wrote: i cant for the life of me understand how a town person votes someone for something he forgot

Town does it all the time. The reasoning may not be at the forefront of your mind, but the impression still is.

Unvote

Vote Svenskt Stål

Choo choo.

I feel like i am in fucking twilight zone just lol this site

can someone fucking explain it to me then?

like how do you forget WHY you vote someone?

IT CANT BE A STRONG READ???

In post 418, AngryPidgeon wrote:What do you think of the Alpacazard?

I said it before, I'll say it again: I'll get back to you on that.

Like, I literally remember nothing about them. I know they've been posting. I remember seeing and reading their posts. I remember absolutely nothing about their posts other than that they exist. I need to get back to ya on it. Because my current read on them is the same as if they hadn't posted at all. (Dead-null.)

He never said it was a strong read. You just interpreted "still scum" to mean "Strong read" because it was convenient for your case.

What "Still scum" actually mean was this:

Oh dear, it would appear as if there was a post rollback for approximately 36 hours. This is unfortunate as it would appear that all of the posts Majiffy made have been lost to the Tigers. I do recall that they were scummy posts though as I still feel my vote is best placed on Majiffy until something better arises.

In post 430, AngryPidgeon wrote:He never said it was a strong read. You just interpreted "still scum" to mean "Strong read" because it was convenient for your case.

What "Still scum" actually mean was this:

Oh dear, it would appear as if there was a post rollback for approximately 36 hours. This is unfortunate as it would appear that all of the posts Majiffy made have been lost to the Tigers. I do recall that they were scummy posts though as I still feel my vote is best placed on Majiffy until something better arises.

by strong scum read i am reffering to the fact that he is voting majiffy, thus making majiffy his strongest scum suspect IN THE GAME, AND HE DONT KNOW WHY

if it is just a "hey this feels off, i am voting you" then i dont see the revote making sense

it is more likely that his read isnt genuine and that he became caught in it

Well he can't exactly quote Majiffy posts right now can he?

People are varying degrees of involved in the game. Like MafiaSSK tends to lurk 100% of the time, for instance. Not remembering EXACTLY why Majiffy is scummy isn't a scumtell? He remembered he thought Majiffy was scum and voted him.

Your point -might- make sense if Vezok had actually written a case on Majiffy and subsequently forgotten it. But forgetting what about Majiffy's string of herpaderp was scummy exactly means that he isn't reaching for reasons to justify himself. He called it a gut scumread. Thats not much different than people quoting posts and saying "gut" and voting them. Except this time there are no posts to quote any more.

What is your read on bulbazak?

In post 425, sekai no ki wrote:lol. I was literally posting a vote bulba when 424 came up in p-edit. And the post wrecks my ostensible reason for making the vote. Will think on it a bit.

I'm not quite sure what you said here. Can you walk me through it?

In post 428, Svenskt Stål wrote:like how do you forget WHY you vote someone?

Time passes. You see something that makes you say "Ha! Scum!", and then when you wake up in the morning, you forget exactly what it was (which is complicated by posts disappearing), you just know that the person is scummy. It happens all the time.

In post 433, AngryPidgeon wrote:Well he can't exactly quote Majiffy posts right now can he?

People are varying degrees of involved in the game. Like MafiaSSK tends to lurk 100% of the time, for instance. Not remembering EXACTLY why Majiffy is scummy isn't a scumtell? He remembered he thought Majiffy was scum and voted him.

Your point -might- make sense if Vezok had actually written a case on Majiffy and subsequently forgotten it. But forgetting what about Majiffy's string of herpaderp was scummy exactly means that he isn't reaching for reasons to justify himself. He called it a gut scumread. Thats not much different than people quoting posts and saying "gut" and voting them. Except this time there are no posts to quote any more.

What is your read on bulbazak?

If it actually was a specific post or post, then no he cant qoute, but i feel strongly that he should be able to give the cliffnotes, without the post, like if it was the wording or a bad read or all the excuses.

bulbla is growing on me

In post 432, Svenskt Stål wrote:if it is just a "hey this feels off, i am voting you" then i dont see the revote making sense

it is more likely that his read isnt genuine and that he became caught in it

I was the first post on the wagon. I am not sure how you think I got caught in my read.
I mean I would've been already caught in it just because I voted him.
Seriously, your reasoning doesn't make sense to me.

people keep saying that

In post 435, Svenskt Stål wrote:

In post 433, AngryPidgeon wrote:Well he can't exactly quote Majiffy posts right now can he?

People are varying degrees of involved in the game. Like MafiaSSK tends to lurk 100% of the time, for instance. Not remembering EXACTLY why Majiffy is scummy isn't a scumtell? He remembered he thought Majiffy was scum and voted him.

Your point -might- make sense if Vezok had actually written a case on Majiffy and subsequently forgotten it. But forgetting what about Majiffy's string of herpaderp was scummy exactly means that he isn't reaching for reasons to justify himself. He called it a gut scumread. Thats not much different than people quoting posts and saying "gut" and voting them. Except this time there are no posts to quote any more.

What is your read on bulbazak?

If it actually was a specific post or post, then no he cant qoute, but i feel strongly that he should be able to give the cliffnotes, without the post, like if it was the wording or a bad read or all the excuses.

bulbla is growing on me

You feel strongly that I should be able to give out cliffnotes. I can guarantee you I can't.

In post 437, Svenskt Stål wrote:people keep saying that

I don't care what other people say. I said that don't understand your reasoning. Please explain in such a way that I would understand.

And the posts came crumbling down, on the site that we loooOoooOove.

Tigers came rolling over the hills, bringing 501 GATEWAY TIMEOUTS from aboooOoooOve.

But if you close your eyes. Can you almost see Majif's posts?

But if you close your eyes. Does it almost feel like hes still scum?

In post 439, vezokpiraka wrote:

In post 437, Svenskt Stål wrote:people keep saying that

I don't care what other people say. I said that

I

don't understand your reasoning. Please explain in such a way that I would understand.

i have restated what i dont understand and dont like about your vote in the thread, read it

In post 434, Bulbazak wrote:I'm not quite sure what you said here. Can you walk me through it?

What I said was negative space, e.g., absolutely nothing about what bothered me enough to decide to vote you. So, "I'm not quite sure what you said here" is a huge understatement.

Are you being nice? If so, why?

In post 442, sekai no ki wrote: What I said was negative space, e.g., absolutely nothing about what bothered me enough to decide to vote you. So, "I'm not quite sure what you said here" is a huge understatement.

I quite literally didn't understand what you wrote.

In post 442, sekai no ki wrote: Are you being nice? If so, why?

Give me an example to put this question into context. Am I being nice in what way?

In post 443, Bulbazak wrote:

In post 442, sekai no ki wrote: What I said was negative space, e.g., absolutely nothing about what bothered me enough to decide to vote you. So, "I'm not quite sure what you said here" is a huge understatement.

I quite literally didn't understand what you wrote.

1. I was afk, thought about the game some, wondered where to put our vote next.

2. Voice in my head said "vote bulba".

3. I checked your iso to see if I was remembering your posts correctly.

4. I wrote a naked vote and clicked "submit"

5. Your post about Svenskt stopped my vote from going through immediately.

6. I read the post, decided it knocked a hole in the iso basis for my vote, though it doesn't address why you came to mind in the first place.

7. I rewrote my post, wondering what you'd reply.

In post 442, sekai no ki wrote: Are you being nice? If so, why?

Give me an example to put this question into context. Am I being nice in what way?

In not trying to nail me to the wall for indirectly FoSing you without providing any reasoning.

In post 444, sekai no ki wrote: In not trying to nail me to the wall for indirectly FoSing you without providing any reasoning.

I didn't understand whether you were going to vote me or vote someone else (possibly Sven) when my post stopped you. At most, I would have inquired into your reasoning, not FoS'd you.

Waiting for the whole game to be restored before I finish catching up.

^ AH HA, THE TRIED AND TRUE



SITE-CRASH SCUMTELL.

SCUM DETECTED.

AP you ever tried pulling your head out of your ass?

I don't think Majiffy is scum

Sven could be though