Page 18 of 85
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:51 pm
by shos
none of the wagons seem very viable yet, 3 votes on them at max. this sucks ass and balls though. can you give me the short version of why PB is actaully scum, apart from lurking and a bad first post?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:53 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑ shos wrote:none of the wagons seem very viable yet, 3 votes on them at max. this sucks ass and balls though. can you give me the short version of why PB is actaully scum, apart from lurking and a bad first post?
Do you see anything pro-town about him? Lurking, awkward conf. post and very little content when he does decide to post.
All point towards scum, amirite?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:54 pm
by Majiffy
↑ shos wrote:while taking a dump now.
I'll take "Things Majiffy Didn't Need To Know" for 500, Alex.
↑ shos wrote:this is epic dude
gimme more
Tally Hall. They've had two albums, go download them. Or buy them, if you can afford it. They're definitely worth whatever people need to shell out for albums these days.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:54 pm
by shos
I'll also get this tomorrow cuz it's nearing 3am.
so you can elaborate as much as you want, too.
also please find what I'm talking about regarding the hydra-lurking and vote dr pants
pedit:
no, I don't, but I also do not see anything scummy. you're basically policy-lynching a lurker.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:55 pm
by shos
↑ Majiffy wrote: ↑ shos wrote:while taking a dump now.
I'll take "Things Majiffy Didn't Need To Know" for 500, Alex.
↑ shos wrote:this is epic dude
gimme more
Tally Hall. They've had two albums, go download them. Or buy them, if you can afford it. They're definitely worth whatever people need to shell out for albums these days.
hey, what you want, this is the best thing to do on phone there >__>;;;
I'll google'm tomorrow
thanks for the musical input. can you modkill scum now?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:59 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Hmm. I personally find lurking and not contributing kind of scummy, this may be biased from my past few games though where scum have used this tactic and I have allowed them to completely fall of my radar and get to endgame/win.
I also really dislike his confirmation post. I can't stress it enough, I know it's just one post but I feel pretty strongly about it.
If neither Pants or PB wagon looks like being the wagon for D1, you wanna compromise on Aronis?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:59 pm
by Beck
↑ shos wrote:no, I don't, but I also do not see anything scummy. you're basically policy-lynching a lurker.
Who could very well be scum
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:05 pm
by shos
why AM I NOT ASLEEP YET
DAMMIT
I fully understand you. and yet. Dr Pants is by far, and I mean far, like england-australia far, more likely to be scum. and if that isn't far enough, I'll give you Crab Nebula-earth far.
both of you are on my obvtown list. please think well
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:08 pm
by Beck
I'm thinking, i just glanced at his ISO, I need to do more than that.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:08 pm
by Majiffy
↑ shos wrote:can you modkill scum now?
Since you're such a good sport, I'll think on it.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:16 pm
by Dr Pants
shos, its fine if you want to start a crusade against me, but dont be an idiot. you barely even listed any problems in my posts, mostly that they made you want to post emotes.
lets be very clear here:
There were a lot of large wagons that happened very quickly early in the game.
So, I'm running on the assumption that scum is within these players who keep vote hopping, and players who end up getting wagoned look to be less scummy for it.
Titus isn't scum, and I dont know why you took issue with my post telling Desp that he was wrong.
I'm in a pissy mood, so lets look at your case against me:
↑ shos wrote:Dr. Pants posts in the same page are just so fucking terrible. terribly terrible. looks like a white knight of prolapsed.
So since I didn't sheep a stupid wagon I'm white knighting.
↑ shos wrote:page 10 is full of useless contentless posts by Dr Pants. it's all just so general and fake, and notice how no vote comes with them?
specifically 234 is super scummy.
How is 234 scummy? Why are my posts "general" and "fake"? Why should I change my vote?
↑ shos wrote:
Dr Pants is just...every single post of his makes me
Well stop the fucking presses! What a fantastic and well articulated argument.
↑ shos wrote:
Dr Pants is omfghowisthisstillalivewtf
VOTE: dr pants
how is this not even a wagon yet??
quickwagon rise - RIGHT NOW. everyon eplease ISO pants. please just do that, it isn't so hard.
k. so you've really said nothing.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:19 pm
by Dr Pants
Like actually, you have an issue with me not changing my vote on page 10, but I spent page 10 saying why BBT was scum, and I was voting BBT.
You have the density of a neutron star.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:52 pm
by shos
↑ Dr Pants wrote:
You have the density of a neutron star.
that's clever, why not go onwards to more massive stars and end up with a SMBH?
your point that I did not make a case is legit. That is because I was not sifting throuh the entire game to make a case, I was catching up and taking notes. maybe, if I get the time, I'll make a case for you, but go see the 'cases are scummy' argument for why this is another reason to lynch you. a townie would say *only* your latest post.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:36 pm
by shos
Besides I get to choose my policy lynches and while PB is aviable candidate he just wont do. I wipp onlu vote that slot bearing DL in mind, but really.
Anyone voting a usrless wagon (lol there is oneon BBT?) like me, bbt, aronis etc should vote either PB or Pants, otherwise you are wasting your vote and we may NL
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 7:02 pm
by Dr Pants
↑ shos wrote:
Anyone voting a usrless wagon (lol there is oneon BBT?) like me, bbt, aronis etc should vote either PB or Pants, otherwise you are wasting your vote and we may NL
↑ Majiffy wrote:Prolapsed Brain (3): Beck, BlueBloodedToffee, Egg
Shos (2): geraintm, GrayFoxxxx
DoubleTrouble (1): Prolapsed Brain
BlueBloodedToffee (3): DrPants, Aronis, Double Trouble
Aronis
(3): Desperado, theaceofspades,
shos
theaceofspades (1): Perfect Chaos
yeah that aronis wagon sure was useless, better lynch those scummy players who pushed it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shos
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 8:32 pm
by shos
Dude are you even in the same game?
My aronis vote was there for like over 10 pages while I wasn't active. It is not a viable wagon right now, so the votes on it are wasted. Do you think *I* am a viable wagon? Or you just want the day to end with no lynch?
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:46 am
by geraintm
↑ Egg wrote:Unvote, Vote Prolapsed
for deadline.
Are we getting nothing else from you the rest of today?
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:48 am
by geraintm
↑ Desperado wrote:Why is BBT the best of the available options?
Why are you not more concerned about him wanting you dead most?
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:52 am
by geraintm
↑ Beck wrote: ↑ Double Trouble wrote:Because the prolapsed wagon sucks shit and I townread Pants hard.
~DT
Why does it suck shit? What has he done to help town? To find scum? To do anything remotely close to appear town?
I'll wait, cause there's no way you can show him doing any of those things... Cause he hasn't
He is very under the radar. Barely above water.
He isn't being bad though and looking to lynch anyone for scummy reasons.
Pretty null to me
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:00 am
by geraintm
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Shos, Pants is probably not a viable lynch today.
Can you join the PB wagon? Secondary choice is Aronis.
They both look like good wagons for toDay.
I can see shos getting lynched.
Aronis is not a good choice.
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:03 am
by geraintm
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote: ↑ shos wrote:none of the wagons seem very viable yet, 3 votes on them at max. this sucks ass and balls though. can you give me the short version of why PB is actaully scum, apart from lurking and a bad first post?
Do you see anything pro-town about him? Lurking, awkward conf. post and very little content when he does decide to post.
All point towards scum, amirite?
There is very little pro town from anyone in this game today.
Like, I am guessing the bad attempts at lynches are partly bad play from try hard townies and scum. But I have no info to decide which is which. Tomorrow will make things clearer...
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:06 am
by geraintm
↑ Dr Pants wrote: ↑ shos wrote:
Anyone voting a usrless wagon (lol there is oneon BBT?) like me, bbt, aronis etc should vote either PB or Pants, otherwise you are wasting your vote and we may NL
↑ Majiffy wrote:Prolapsed Brain (3): Beck, BlueBloodedToffee, Egg
Shos (2): geraintm, GrayFoxxxx
DoubleTrouble (1): Prolapsed Brain
BlueBloodedToffee (3): DrPants, Aronis, Double Trouble
Aronis
(3): Desperado, theaceofspades,
shos
theaceofspades (1): Perfect Chaos
yeah that aronis wagon sure was useless, better lynch those scummy players who pushed it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shos
Like this post. It somehow arrives when I have been for a while...
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:07 am
by shos
and yet, you're voting a hopeless and reasonless wagon. come on, join my quickwagon on dryfit.
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:25 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
↑ Dr Pants wrote:
yeah that aronis wagon sure was useless, better lynch those scummy players who pushed it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shos
Are you voting Shos for voting Aronis? Or are you voting Shos because Shos is voting you?
Both seem equally bad reasons.
↑ shos wrote:Dude are you even in the same game?
My aronis vote was there for like over 10 pages while I wasn't active. It is not a viable wagon right now
I disagree, I think Aronis is an excellent secondary wagon should people decide that PB somehow isn't scum.
↑ geraintm wrote:
There is very little pro town from anyone in this game today.
It's certainly distinguishable between who is being pro-town and who isn't.
Just as a side note, lurking seems to be close to optimal play for scum based on what I have seen on this site recently. How can you get lynched if you don't provide any content to be questioned on or any thoughts to explain? Everyone is like 'Oh, X is null because they haven't really done anything'. Or 'Wait for X to provide content so we can get a read' or 'We can't lynch X because it's basically a PL', etc etc. It's certainly something I am beginning to keep am eye on.
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 5:22 am
by geraintm
↑ shos wrote:and yet, you're voting a hopeless and reasonless wagon. come on, join my quickwagon on dryfit.
Dry Fit?