Page 18 of 82
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:23 pm
by Suzune
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Suzanne I thought you read the thread
I did...but I might have missed that part. I am sorry.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:24 pm
by notscience
↑ 3dicerolling wrote:@ns - can you explain your anti scum read? Also, if you are getting onto gilga for not making a comeback post for not reading the thread, what do you feel now about suzune?
Not really. I wasn't satisfied by anything he's done but I've been willing to give him space (And still am) to get his head in things.
I'm not getting onto Gilgamesh for not making a comeback post, I'm saying there is a hypocrisy in his posts that I find to more likely to come from scum than come from town.
I don't think Suzune's claimed to have read our posts in depth so it's not as much of an issue for me.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:26 pm
by CharlotteBebe
so you think scumanti takes the neutral stance/diplomatic stance in the middle of mollie and i calling each other scum?
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:27 pm
by notscience
As scum it's so much easier to be diplomatic than to stir the pot as after flips are on the table, if he stirred the pot between the two of us, and we both are flipped town, he's going to be powerlynched.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:28 pm
by CharlotteBebe
do you think scumAnti specifically does that though?
vs just not doing anything.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:30 pm
by notscience
Where did he even do that
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:30 pm
by notscience
I'm looking in his ISO and don't see what you're even referring to
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:32 pm
by CharlotteBebe
his last two posts feel like genuine-ish to me.
maybe diplomatic is the wrong word.
but he had the opportunity to be opportunistic and he didnt take it at all when it would have been pretty easy to do so or even easier to just kind of avoid it altogether and do soft commentary afterwards.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:33 pm
by notscience
He could have jumped on after the fact, yes, but I think that would look sketchy and I think we're delving into emotional territory that's not indicative of alignment.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:45 pm
by Antihero
↑ CharlotteBebe wrote:so you think scumanti takes the neutral stance/diplomatic stance in the middle of mollie and i calling each other scum?
it has nothing to do w/ diplomacy. it really doesn't have anything to do w/ the game.
it has everything to do w/ trying to not have a close friend replace out b/c of something i did.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:48 pm
by Spiffeh
Anti you didn't really do anything wrong tho
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:48 pm
by Spiffeh
Also at quick glance I think your avatar is Scar from The Lion King.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:51 pm
by Spiffeh
Redacted
Removed content not meant for this game
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:54 pm
by itlepip
↑ Spiffeh wrote:Redacted
Removed content not meant for this game
Wrong thread
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:55 pm
by Spiffeh
FUCK you're right.
Can the mod delete that?
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:02 pm
by Spiffeh
To be clear:
@mod can you delete post 437, that was not meant for this game
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:04 pm
by Flay Gunnar
↑ Spiffeh wrote:@mod can you delete post 437, that was not meant for this game
I don't really like deleting player posts, so i put them in spoilerboxes for now until i talk with pie about it
Edit: Ok talked with pie about it, message has been removed.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:05 pm
by Spiffeh
Ok sorry about that.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:56 pm
by Gilgamesh King Of Heroes
↑ notscience wrote:He's not actually reading my posts as I've referred to myself as a knight several times and his post referred to me as a king, which, if you were reading someone's posts closely enough to get a bearing on their alignment and especially if you were trying to divine associative tells from their posting, missing a detail that persisted through the ISO is pretty fucking sketchy.
Whomever knighted you was not fit to do so. Only I hold that privilege.
Regardless of your terminology, your title is a sham. You are nothing more than a faker.
And for the record, my scumread on you is on your slot as a whole. You and mollie both had some weird posts that pinged me, but nothing I can quite point out, so I noted a leaning scumread. That said, I don't think I want you lynched
today
. At least, not as of this post.
3dr's
423 is bad, between misrepping notsci and the way he's trying to divert attention is something I see coming from scum more than town. Not sure if that makes Suzune more or less likely to be scum if I take that read into account.
I probably shouldn't give it much thought for right now.
Notty, what is your opinion on Suzune?
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:43 am
by Maxous
↑ notscience wrote:
Because he's scumreading me while simultaneously not actually reading my posts and passing off a read as gut.
He's not actually reading my posts as I've referred to myself as a knight several times and his post referred to me as a king, which, if you were reading someone's posts closely enough to get a bearing on their alignment and especially if you were trying to divine associative tells from their posting, missing a detail that persisted through the ISO is pretty fucking sketchy.
↑ PocketFullofSunshine wrote:HEAR YE, HEAR YE
By order of the king
I hereby degree a townread on users (Maxous, Spiffeh)
By order of the king, one "Antihero" has been sentenced to death.
@Notscience ^
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:50 am
by Maxous
↑ notscience wrote:
Not really. I wasn't satisfied by anything he's done but I've been willing to give him space (And still am) to get his head in things.
echoing this^ regarding antihero
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:51 am
by Maxous
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 6:35 am
by Spiffeh
So can people tell me why they are town reading itlepip then?
Just because I have been being pretty obnoxious about it doesn't take away the points I'm making.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:03 am
by 3dicerolling
Actually, I think I'm ready to sheep spiffeh.
VOTE: itlepip
I don't like the timing of #438. At all.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:08 am
by Spiffeh
Thx bby
But what's your problem with post 438?