Page 18 of 257

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:42 am
by Almost50
In post 349, Titus wrote:
In post 347, Lapsa wrote:I got Macho role modifier
I love this gambit. Me too.
More so. Less townish though ^^

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:44 am
by Almost50
In post 350, Boem_u_dusi wrote:You need to take a chill pill. And to unvote Dunnstral.
Not unless he towns up in MY eyes.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:49 am
by Almost50
In post 352, shannon wrote:A meta question, how the hell do you remember everyone, much less organise them in to a list like that? I am still experiencing overwhelm with the sheer volume of posts and unfamiliar names.
Use a text file to keep notes on individuals. Some put detailed remarks, others just use a point system or +/- rating or whatever. (I use colour shades)

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:50 am
by Zachstralkita
podoboq wrote: If it's going to be anti-town to discuss it any more (for reasons), then I'll drop it.
Why did you word it like this? The very fact you're mentioning it already draws attention and I'm mentioning you mentioning it which means I'M inadvertently mentioning it, which makes this 100% your fault and like 22% mine.


When has it ever been town to discuss such things on Day 1? In THIS SCENARIO, how is it town to discuss it in the first place?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:56 am
by podoboq
In post 428, Zachstralkita wrote:When has it ever been town to discuss such things on Day 1? In THIS SCENARIO, how is it town to discuss it in the first place?
When the person you're talking about is scum. But my townreads seem to think he isn't, so I'm throwing my hands up on this one.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:57 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 429, podoboq wrote:
In post 428, Zachstralkita wrote:When has it ever been town to discuss such things on Day 1? In THIS SCENARIO, how is it town to discuss it in the first place?
When the person you're talking about is scum. But my townreads seem to think he isn't, so I'm throwing my hands up on this one.

Image

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:00 am
by Almost50
In post 360, Zachstralkita wrote:not to mention Titus and Lapsa have made it really fucking difficult for people to believe me when I say I'M the one with a Macho role modifier.
:lol: :lol:

OK.. if there's a doctor in this setup, I CAN be protected!! :D

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:06 am
by Mirhawk
Or now.
In post 153, Dunnstral wrote:Ok Sickofit1138 and Zachstralkita both mafia
Why is Zach scum?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:08 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 432, Mirhawk wrote:Or now.
In post 153, Dunnstral wrote:Ok Sickofit1138 and Zachstralkita both mafia
Why is Zach scum?
I'm contacting you from the future

He's changed his read on me just like I called and knows I'm right

Dunn, in the future next time don't be so difficult

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:12 am
by Mirhawk
Wait nevermind I get it.

Pedit
Or maybe not? I dunno I'm not caught up yet.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:25 am
by Mirhawk
In post 209, Performer wrote: Please link us those as well. Nobody seems to know you in here, which is shocking and disturbing.
I know podoboq. I just fished a large game with him. Nothing he's done so far is unusual for him. I have maybe a slight townread on him.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:31 am
by Mirhawk
Anyone thinking wake inturrupting Titus is alignment indicative should think again. I'm fairly certain I've seen the two of them argue about this exact thing before.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:50 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 436, Mirhawk wrote:Anyone thinking wake inturrupting Titus is alignment indicative should think again. I'm fairly certain I've seen the two of them argue about this exact thing before.
If they argued about this exact thing before, what is the exact point of doing it again?


Anyways, I'm pleased to announce I compiled a reads list diagram by hand so you all could see the thought processes I'm cultivating. Complete with key!

Airick and Varsoon are omitted. AGar is most definitely town, and Performer is neutral/townlean.

Spoiler: Town/Key
Image



Spoiler: Neutral/HBP
Image


Spoiler: Scum
Image

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:56 am
by Titus
VOTE: Zach

For emphasis.

Lamisty post definition.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:58 am
by Titus
P.s. If you're going to go hand written notes, actually write them.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:59 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 438, Titus wrote:VOTE: Zach

For emphasis.

Lamisty post definition.
Interesting response, not at all what I was expecting, but I poured my blood, sweat and tears into that shit.

And if you think I of all people need to LAMIST then I want whatever combination of clear alcohol and benzo you're on.

Titus wrote:P.s. If you're going to go hand written notes, actually write them.
yea then id have to take pictures and get the pictures on my computer

you don't know me so you don't know how much i hate doing work

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:01 am
by Titus
Dude you sat at a paint program and weren't smart enough to use the type button.

That's Lamisty and a trick from my playbook...3 years ago.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:02 am
by Zachstralkita
Also school is out. I did not begin summer to put my hands anywhere near paper and writing utensils, thank you very fucking much.
Titus wrote:Dude you sat at a paint program and weren't smart enough to use the type button.

That's Lamisty and a trick from my playbook...3 years ago.
I didn't use text on purpose. If I was typing stuff I should have just... typed it in thread derrrr
Titus wrote:Dude you sat at a paint program and weren't smart enough to use the type button.

That's Lamisty and a trick from my playbook...3 years ago.
Is what you're doing right now a trick from your lynch town playbook?

Pretty good play, I must admit.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:04 am
by Boem_u_dusi
In post 438, Titus wrote:VOTE: Zach

For emphasis.

Lamisty post definition.
Come on, that was a cute post.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:05 am
by Titus
@Zach, Nope but what you're doing is.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:08 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 444, Titus wrote:@Zach, Nope but what you're doing is.
That makes not a lick of sense considering I'm voting Wake, who you were voting before voting me.

Also, you were voting me before you voted me just now. Talk about obsessions?


I promise you good town members, the names listed on my scum list are most certainly accurate.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:09 am
by Zachstralkita
Also Wake/Titus arguing with each other is perfectly valid as a scumteam. This is not concrete though, I want Wake to post more and the Wake thing is optional and has no bearing on Titus's status as scum or not.

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:09 am
by Titus

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:12 am
by Zachstralkita
I'm sorry to inform you that those two links have jack shit to do with ME being scum, however. You should have put that together by now.


Humans are fickle.


(That was also nice but when I made that post initially, I was looking to pay homage to a GOAT. Let me see if I can find it.)

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:15 am
by Zachstralkita
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7971877

There we go. That guy is a fucking G.


I'll toss in that he flipped VT just for fun.