Mafiascum.net

In post 422, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 419, House wrote:FA is like that judge on The Good Wife that requires lawyers to end assertions in "in my opinion".

I guess we're getting out of topic and I have no idea what your trying to ask me here

It's a joke.

Great tv show, you should watch it so my snark isn't wasted on you.

I just signed

In post 424, Hoopla wrote:don't try and rope me into arguing and forcing me to ban myself!

lol

but you started it!

so where I'm wrong in anything I said?

In post 425, House wrote:It's a joke.

Great tv show, you should watch it so my snark isn't wasted on you.

I will add that to my watch list maybe

still didn't understand what you tried to say though

In post 423, Accountant wrote:I'm fine with signing that form. You can consider this my signature in spirit.

Somehow I don't trust you. What would you say if I posted multiple links that show me being reasonable right now?

In post 421, Yume wrote:Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

I won't lie, you're adorable.

Signed.

In post 429, Yume wrote:

In post 423, Accountant wrote:I'm fine with signing that form. You can consider this my signature in spirit.

Somehow I don't trust you. What would you say if I posted multiple links that show me being reasonable right now?

i promise you I won't ignore them or pretend they don't exist

In post 428, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 425, House wrote:It's a joke.

Great tv show, you should watch it so my snark isn't wasted on you.

I will add that to my watch list maybe

still didn't understand what you tried to say though

Of course what we're saying is our opinion.

That's implied by the fact we're saying it.

Unless we are leveling threats of consequences, we're not acting like we can enforce. It's just an opinion.

In post 430, House wrote:

In post 421, Yume wrote:Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

I won't lie, you're adorable.

Signed.

You choosing other makes your whole suggestion a load of bull. If you were genuine, you would have selected yes.

In post 433, Yume wrote:

In post 430, House wrote:

In post 421, Yume wrote:Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

I won't lie, you're adorable.

Signed.

You choosing other makes your whole suggestion a load of bull. If you were genuine, you would have selected yes.

I did choose yes seconds before other.

I chose Other the second time so I could type my name to show you that I signed it.

Stop being so negative.

In post 432, House wrote:

In post 428, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 425, House wrote:It's a joke.

Great tv show, you should watch it so my snark isn't wasted on you.

I will add that to my watch list maybe

still didn't understand what you tried to say though

Of course what we're saying is our opinion.

That's implied by the fact we're saying it.

Unless we are leveling threats of consequences, we're not acting like we can enforce. It's just an opinion.

I disagree there is acertain level of aggression in your criticizes and a the charisma of a judge in the way you all speaking. saying something is right or worng in your pov is not equal to saying its defintly wrong or definitly right and it must have X, Y , Z punishments forever!

You all have your games for yourself and can enforce these stuff there. you can suggest punishments or enforcements and restrictions but nothing is definite!

In post 435, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 432, House wrote:

In post 428, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 425, House wrote:It's a joke.

Great tv show, you should watch it so my snark isn't wasted on you.

I will add that to my watch list maybe

still didn't understand what you tried to say though

Of course what we're saying is our opinion.

That's implied by the fact we're saying it.

Unless we are leveling threats of consequences, we're not acting like we can enforce. It's just an opinion.

I disagree there is acertain level of aggression in your criticizes and a the charisma of a judge in the way you all speaking. saying something is right or worng in your pov is not equal to saying its defintly wrong or definitly right and it must have X, Y , Z punishments forever!

You all have your games for yourself and can enforce these stuff there. you can suggest punishments or enforcements and restrictions but nothing is definite!

And I see none of that, so your point is... ?

In post 434, House wrote:

In post 433, Yume wrote:

In post 430, House wrote:

In post 421, Yume wrote:Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

I won't lie, you're adorable.

Signed.

You choosing other makes your whole suggestion a load of bull. If you were genuine, you would have selected yes.

I did choose yes seconds before other.

I chose Other the second time so I could type my name to show you that I signed it.

Stop being so negative.

Says someone who dismissed my arguments without even considering them.

shrugs!

I'm happy that we reached a conclusion here anyway so I don't want to argue about the past issues.

In post 437, Yume wrote:

In post 434, House wrote:

In post 433, Yume wrote:

In post 430, House wrote:

In post 421, Yume wrote:Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

I won't lie, you're adorable.

Signed.

You choosing other makes your whole suggestion a load of bull. If you were genuine, you would have selected yes.

I did choose yes seconds before other.

I chose Other the second time so I could type my name to show you that I signed it.

Stop being so negative.

Says someone who dismissed my arguments without even considering them.

My head is still in traction and I can't be bashing it against walls right now.

Sorry.

If this is what this community truly thinks of me, why should I even bother? You and Wisdom will not budge even if I posted a hundred game links that show me being reasonable. Wisdom because he himself wasn't in any of those games and you because you are stubborn as hell.

drop it please!

Yume will you only play newbie games for a while?

everyone else is that ok with you all? you signed yes

In post 440, Yume wrote:If this is what this community truly thinks of me, why should I even bother? You and Wisdom will not budge even if I posted a hundred game links that show me being reasonable. Wisdom because he himself wasn't in any of those games and you because you are stubborn as hell.

their just bad at expressing themselves! Noone hates you here

get over yourself!

how is house using the "other" option to write his name proof that he is being insincere about his signing?

In post 441, Frozen Angel wrote:drop it please!

Yume will you only play newbie games for a while?

everyone else is that ok with you all? you signed yes

I will not play ANY games for a while, because I will be banned.

In post 443, Accountant wrote:how is house using the "other" option to write his name proof that he is being insincere about his signing?

its just she is observing everything negative as fuck becuase you all were attacking him all at once.

Its a simple emotional reaction nothing else!

In post 440, Yume wrote:If this is what this community truly thinks of me, why should I even bother? You and Wisdom will not budge even if I posted a hundred game links that show me being reasonable. Wisdom because he himself wasn't in any of those games and you because you are stubborn as hell.

Yume, my remark was just a joke.

I'm sorry that you didn't take it as such.

In post 444, Yume wrote:I will not play ANY games for a while, because I will be banned.

If I get all people who are trying to wotc you and are attacking you in line and talk with listmod to forgive you this once or reduce your punishment will you promise me to just play newbie games for a while?

In post 443, Accountant wrote:how is house using the "other" option to write his name proof that he is being insincere about his signing?

This is someone who is willing to go to extremes to get rid of me. Notice how he kept insisting even after I hydra-ed up? Proof that was willing to throw out someone else just to get rid of me. This is the kind of person he is.

p-edit: With the exception of your game, yes.

I'm in line, Yume, as a sign of good faith I'll lay off.