Mafiascum.net

In post 421, Dunnstral wrote:It's simpler than that, he voted me because I voted him

I'm not really one to say OMGUS in a vacuum = scum

how do you feel about OA

My huge issue is I really, really need more data points from both SS and OA

gutshotting in 2-3 RL days in is fine; we have fewer than 5 left now and i'm like

one thing about mafia that frustrates me is how certain everyone around me always feels

In post 426, borkjerfkin wrote:how do you feel about OA

I don't want to lynch them, if shadow is scum I wouldn't think they were bussing there. If multiball is possible that changes things of course. Wouldn't want to lynch them today

Votecount 1.14

Aj The Epic

(3) - Seiko x Naomi, The Oxford Bubbles, Syryana

(L-2!)

Obvious Alt

(1) - Aj The Epic

Shadow_step

(2) - Dunnstral, Obvious Alt

Dunnstral

(1) - Shadow_step

Not Voting

(2) - Charloux, borkjerfkin

With

9

players eligible to vote, it’s

5

to lynch!

Day 1 will end in

(expired on 2017-01-26 06:01:00).

Mod Notes:

None!

I mean it's really irrelevant because if OA is scum, Syr is partner, not S_S. OA outright townreads Syr, Syr's opinion is leanscum/null but has that post where he appeals to keep OA, even if it's more a joke than anything else. While he calls the OA jump bad, he's still using it as an incrimination to me. If I flip town, guess what? OA's not my partner, which was the basis of the post in 375 for either Dunn or OA (dunn == ballsiest partner ever, OA == laziest partner). And he's not sure of me, thinks OA looks worse than Dunn but won't move.

To me, this is the cut/dry partner to OA, not S_S

S_S is town, I think; his point on Dunn re: scum WK'ing a town player in order to leave them for a later mislynch makes a lot of sense given it is pretty much exactly what Dunn did in our last game with him (successfully). I have a lot of reservations about Dunn's play here even outside of how he's approaching AJ, too.

the scum pool I'm working with atm is {AJ, OA, Dunn}. I'm hoping to reconvene with notty sometime soon and work out the reads we disagree on.

bork, when you're around, can we talk?

Im awake a little longer

In post 433, borkjerfkin wrote:Im awake a little longer

AJ is sending off really obvious scum signals to me, and I don't really think "AJ is just always awkward" is an excuse for it. I think what I'm seeing about him falls outside of that and if you're up for it, I'd like to go through his posts with you and talk about what I'm seeing/why you think his body of work looks town and whether I'm wrong to think this.

I'm trying to hash this out with notty atm, too, fwiw, so we should also have his opinion on it one way or the other sometime soon.

VOTE: Shadowstep

dunnstral's posts are good! But seiko's are not, so I won't vote with them.

ANYWAY, I think what Dunn said about shadowstep scumslipping was good! Shadow must be trying to cover up thefact that he is scum!!!

Thanks Dunstrall!!!

Seiko, I will lynch you next!

- Bubbles

In post 435, The Oxford Bubbles wrote:VOTE: Shadowstep

dunnstral's posts are good! But seiko's are not, so I won't vote with them.

ANYWAY, I think what Dunn said about shadowstep scumslipping was good! Shadow must be trying to cover up thefact that he is scum!!!

Thanks Dunstrall!!!

Seiko, I will lynch you next!

- Bubbles

i do not fucking get you

In post 434, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I'd like to go through his posts with you and talk about what I'm seeing/why you think his body of work looks town and whether I'm wrong to think this.

that's a big topic for 1AM; tomorrow?

In post 437, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 434, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I'd like to go through his posts with you and talk about what I'm seeing/why you think his body of work looks town and whether I'm wrong to think this.

that's a big topic for 1AM; tomorrow?

kk.

i wish this game had more people interested in being clear and concise and playing the game and less trying to keep themselves hidden / obviously putting a behavioral filter on their posts because ????

that's really helping me play the game thanks OA and TOB

In post 436, borkjerfkin wrote:i do not fucking get you

fwiw I don't have any problem with it, even though I'm curious to know why (and Dunn's posts are anything but good).

notty is screaming at me that I'm wrong as I make this post.

In post 434, Seiko x Naomi wrote:I'd like to go through his posts with you and talk about what I'm seeing/why you think his body of work looks town and whether I'm wrong to think this.

and for the record considering i've vacillated between voting / unvoting him for the past few days I'm not the best person to give a ringing endorsement regardless of where my head is currently at

In post 440, Seiko x Naomi wrote:fwiw I don't have any problem with it, even though I'm curious to know why (and Dunn's posts are anything but good).

I don't know that I have a problem with it or it's scummy or whatever, it's just intentionally vague and awkward sounding for no reason and it's getting to the point where it's not cute or funny and is obfuscating my understanding of what the fuck they're on about

i guess overall maybe if we had more people willing to act like goddamn human beings and engage in natural dialog and i didn't have double the posts of the next person i might be able to poe the game more than i currently can

shruggerino

unrelated question: Dunn, what is your read on TOB?

like every time i think my reads are coalescing someone drops an unexplained/underexplained/badly explained vote and i have to go back and read them off unflipped interactions because i have very little else to go on

I wonder if Seiko hydra even noticed my vote on them

In post 444, Seiko x Naomi wrote:unrelated question: Dunn, what is your read on TOB?

Town

In post 446, Dunnstral wrote:I wonder if Seiko hydra even noticed my vote on them

In post 444, Seiko x Naomi wrote:unrelated question: Dunn, what is your read on TOB?

Town

why?

In post 440, Seiko x Naomi wrote:(and Dunn's posts are anything but good).

huh?

In post 447, Seiko x Naomi wrote:

In post 446, Dunnstral wrote:I wonder if Seiko hydra even noticed my vote on them

In post 444, Seiko x Naomi wrote:unrelated question: Dunn, what is your read on TOB?

Town

why?

I don't think it matters