In post 359, Not_Mafia wrote:VT, you aint got shitIn post 356, UnrealSeal wrote:Hey N_M that's a niceGuiltyresult you gave me there my boy. Why don't you give me a claim.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Ok, so unreal shows up d2, claims Mason Tracker, nm claimed super early AND he didn't vote back unreal. nm said unreal was lying, yet didn't vote him back, and nm claimed. Later he claims he fakeclaimed vt. nm later claims JOAT, and it looks like he's saying he protected khan but it failed, he speculates it's due to a strongman in the scum team. At this point if both these guys are telling the truth, they just outed themselves to scum with a target on each of their backs....sighIn post 392, Not_Mafia wrote:Okay fine, I didn;t want to claim but I'm JOAT, I have a doc,
cop and JK, I used the doc last night, so scum has a strongman
Remaining prs, do NOT claim.
At the same time, If I take several steps back and further think on this, I have to wonder about the setup:
mason tracker, mason tracker, JOAT, mafia goon, scum 2, scum 3.
Trying to think if this makes sense.
I’ve seriously never heard of such a strong & strange town pr in a mini normal, and I’ve hosted a game where scum claimed tracker so that’s not farfeteched if it’s a fakeclaim for Mason Tracker. On the other hand, I always have a soft spot for our prs, and nm looks guilty even without unreal's result.
Huge thanks to jar, completely agree on retract because nm is a quickhammer type, also thank you for waiting for me and others. You'd be appalled by the number of quickhammer and impatient players onsite nowadays.In post 395, JarJarDrinks wrote:don't want to put him to L-1 until everyone has a chance to chime in.
Also,
We got lucky on the byron lynch. But didn’t you - Ircher - realize we had a quickhammer player in here - not_mafia?
---------
Still doing some catchup.