Posted: Mon May 13, 2019 11:53 pm
I feel like insomnia is too erratic to be scum, but if they are a neeewb then I cant rely upon that.
I don't think that's a good vote.In post 416, Fuscezu wrote:Im sorely tempted to vote irre the more of him i read.
That's better.In post 427, Fuscezu wrote:Irrelephant11 - Hate it, but guttown it.
Fair. I'm kind of out of sync with this game in particular. Couldn't tell you why and I hope it switches around day 2. At least I'll make an effort to improve my input.In post 370, skitter30 wrote:it's kinda pressure i suppose; or at least a way to start a dialogue so that i can try to sort out if i'm right or wrong hereIn post 345, RCEnigma wrote:This isn't going to make much sense but I feel like we have similar thought process' in most cases. So sure you reading me scum was weird but it may be from a small sample size. I figured if you're town you would recognize me as town down the line.
Plus confronting you directly wouldn't give me the kind of read on you that I'm looking for. This doesn't seem like a pressure vote but I also don't consider myself as lhf so I still don't know what the play here is.
i was kinda expecting some sort of response to me saying taht i was scumreading you, even if it was just 'why' or something
i guess one of the things that feel a little off is that you feel kinda passive? more than i'd expect at least?
a pretty meh vote for page 4, not necessarily alignment indicative on its own.
I think I sort of townread the quick change in mindset? Not sure scum!CJ gets much out of this anywayIn post 100, ceejayvinoya wrote:This is an improvement.In post 96, Chara wrote:i like them too. it's cute.
Shiidaji: i liked insomnia's entrance and agreed with what he said about both elephant and Percy, two players i'm townreading so far. and he feels good, feels organic.
you feel marginally less good and less organic with the focus you've chosen right now, and i have to echo insomnia's point of you appearing to make judgements based on what you think someone's playstyle should be rather than what it actually is. you can contrast that with what i feel from insomnia with a genuine desire to understand.
it's great to see you as well! i hope we can have a fun game together again. <3
UNVOTE:
I remember townreading the tone here att. Still kinda do.In post 103, ceejayvinoya wrote:We always hurt the ones we love
Not sure I see all these reads (fuscezu and RCE being the most surprising at this point in the game imo)In post 183, ceejayvinoya wrote:Ugh I have fuscezu and tris as townleans for some reason.
Maybe chara too.
I like irrel and rcenigma for town
This is probably the scummiest post from CJ so far - taking the time to further this defensive conversation about his own vote, and mischaracterizing his own post in the process (before now he has never insisted the Chara vote was RVS, in fact just the opposite). Meanwhile no other reads get furthered, no scumhunting done here... etc. Enough for a scumlean if I didn't have one beforeIn post 261, ceejayvinoya wrote:refer to the reply I gave to insomnia.In post 241, skitter30 wrote:....In post 181, ceejayvinoya wrote:Their early posts were not interesting.
Which struck me as blending in for some reason.
i'm not sure i agree with u that chara's early posts were not interesting
i'm also not sure that that having 'not interesting' posts is indicative of trying to blend in?
it's not really indicative in the sense of "oh they did this, that must mean this.". But it's a start. Remember it was my rvs vote.
This looks like s/s but also maybe like s/t if cj's just trying to get on RCE's good side. CJ I would love to see you explain what gave you a strong townread on RCE before post 183.In post 263, ceejayvinoya wrote:I like his posts, he makes more sense to me as town.In post 255, tris wrote:I think there was something else I meant to respond to, but I lost it.Why is rcenigma town?In post 183, ceejayvinoya wrote:Ugh I have fuscezu and tris as townleans for some reason.
Maybe chara too.
I like irrel and rcenigma for town
Again, not furthering any reads or scumhunting, just endlessly explaining his own actions... Yes people are asking him questions, but that shouldn't cut off his ability to ask questions himself.In post 264, ceejayvinoya wrote:I'm more confident on irrel's and rc'sIn post 256, tris wrote:What's the difference between fuscezu and me, and irrel and rcenigma here?In post 183, ceejayvinoya wrote:Ugh I have fuscezu and tris as townleans for some reason.
Maybe chara too.
I like irrel and rcenigma for town
Another meh vote. Sheeping the read of someone he's said he townreads (me), but also voting someone he says he townleans (fuscezu). Doesn't look like genuine scumhunting from here.
Quoting this here to remind myself to explicitly do the mental work of not townreading Chara's cheery tone. Being happy and making sense are two tools some scum get very far with, and from experience I'd put chara in the list of those who use them as scum.
Good reason for a vote, and a good vote imo.In post 53, Chara wrote:VOTE: Shiidaji
i feel the exact opposite about his elephant/Percy proposal!
-snip-
This makes sense to me I guess. Not sure I love that I'm getting a "free pass" because it doesn't make Chara easier to read fmpov but given our past experience it's not out of character.In post 131, Chara wrote:you're a good player and i have some knowledge of your scumgame. innocent until proven guilty is good for me.
same sort of situation as skitter.
Like yeah I've heard these words from town!Chara before. If scum, Chara is mostly trying to avoid stepping on anyone's toes - I'm not sure they'd be so intensely careful like this. I should glance through our shared scumgame to verify.In post 132, Chara wrote:i could go into it further, but i don't see a reason to start talking about how i think you should be read as scum when i don't need to.
Saying my reads are good with one exception is basically NAI (either we're mindmelding or I'm an easy pick to sheep as scum) but I include it to remember Chara's reads from here forwardIn post 151, Chara wrote:elephant after my own heart. except for Clearly.In post 150, Irrelephant11 wrote:I’m losing interest in lynching Chara/Persivul/Smile today
I’m gaining interest in lynching Shiidaji/Clearly/Fuscezu
VOTE: Shiidaji
Again, giving a lot of room for townreading players, not pouncing on anything.In post 258, Chara wrote:though i'm not sure of the scum motivation of ceejay finding a problem with me, then unvoting once the problem had been resolved. the post he quoted was the first one that really held any thought process from me.
And again. My main concern here is Chara's only showed two scumreads and has townread most other players so far. Not a huge deal, but could be indicative of scum having an easy time townreading town.In post 278, Chara wrote:125[post] and [post]244.
i'm still keeping an eye on skitter, but i don't think unnecessary paranoia is helpful after our last game.
Chara could you explain this townread?In post 313, Chara wrote:i'll never understand the business of saying one head of a hydra is scummy but not the whole hydra. usually that just means it's a personality thing.
and i'm townreading Smile, but that's besides the point.
Chara could you explain this townread?In post 314, Chara wrote:i don't know if scum Clearly would keep talking about experience anxiety here.
Chara could you explain this townread?In post 412, Chara wrote:oh, and given another game just ended, i'm more comfortable saying i townread Fuscezu, and i agree with skitter's take that you quoted there.
tbh I kinda expected someone to partner-read my play with Persivul but only in a shallow sense i.e. "Irrelephant giving himself an excuse to not scumread Persivul right off the bat sure is a convenient scum/scum play... but oh wait, it also draws a lot of early attention to them both... maybe it's not" is the thought process I expected at least one person to have. I originally scumread that shii stopped halfway through this thought process, though rereading more posts I'm not sure I still feel that way...In post 38, Shiidaji wrote:I'm looking for a biiig beefy hunk to vote with me wyd
how do u feel about Percy+Elephant together
That game: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=79035In post 43, Shiidaji wrote:mmmmmmmmy only idea of Percy comes from replacing in for him in Zulfy's game. I also expected him to immediately shush and table the role-fishing Town JK discussion because of his "by the book" playstyle that Vedith described. Percy in post 23 should have voted elephant since he is the type to hop on players like skitter for pressure in the first place anyway I also got a bad feeling from elephant's first few posts in the same way that I did on Flavor Leaf in that game.
This is still my least favorite post from shii. I wish shii hadn't disappeared before answering my question about why my very shallow role speculation was scummy, given I didn't encourage anything that would out anyone really.In post 46, Shiidaji wrote:Initially as I read p1 I had the same thought process as Percy had in 23, elephant felt self-conscious in the two VLA posts. In addition a player who's experienced enough to be comfortable with writing the underlined thoughts below!!! vv
-snip-
but still encourages early role discussion felt counterintuitive to me. If elephant is an experienced player they should be ignoring that thread of convo completely until absolutely necessary.It was a sort-of apology to funkybike because you pointed out something from a mod post so I read through all the words of the mod posts and i noticed the rule about PMing the mod if you’re v/la which is already done wrong
I’m also just very bored and posting anything that comes to mind
But yeah I mean if someone has to be scum on the first page I’m definitely a top 3 candidate(after Chara and insomnia) so I don’t blame you
Okay so for a second I was gonna give this one to shiidaji with the following thought process:In post 47, Shiidaji wrote:I'll continue this discussion after Persivul explains why he didn't just vote elephant in 23In post 45, insomnia wrote:As for Percy, it seems like you are casing him based on what you think is his playstyle and he should strictly follow your line of action that you made for him. I don’t know how accurate your reads are based on that, it would certainly take me a lot of games with someone in order to determine how they would usually act.
I did townread this post from shiidaji tonally. "Let us join hands" being actually very towny tonally, the more I think about it. I don't necessarily expect scum to go "I am trying to talk in such a way as to avoid scum understanding, but so that townIn post 54, Shiidaji wrote:-snip-like... in my head this feels obvious and not worth talking about lmao. what I have against it is competent scum potentially combing through conversations related to this topic to Jailkeeper-hunt. Is my point clear yet let us join hands.In post 50, Persivul wrote:I get that if someone does nothing but setup spec it's scummy, but aside from that - what do you have against it?In post 46, Shiidaji wrote:but still encourages early role discussion felt counterintuitive to me.
Site meta lately is premature ejaclaimation. People can't keep their mouths shut. If proper use of known roles is to wait until later before claiming, pointing that out seems appropriate.
This post is basically NAI without the followup.In post 58, Shiidaji wrote:I don't really feel Percyscum anymore Chara. It is nice to see you again my friend. Do you feel like insomnia's entrance was natural? I liked post 45 trying to follow up on my thought process.In post 53, Chara wrote:-snip-
sameIn post 446, Chara wrote:i wanted to pressure him, but with the disappearance i can't, nor can i discuss with him to see where his head's at.
i also didn't like the elephant case being about the jailkeeper thing because that was one item in an ISO that, at the time, was not just mechanical content.