Mafiascum.net

In post 424, Tchill13 wrote:And the only thing I've seen you do worth noting is become active once pushed. Then push the inactive slot WITH the guy that called you a lurker. Very odd to me. Your reads don't have much depth to them.

I'm fine stating datisi and

kop

are definitely top priorities atm.

Is this another error, or are you suddenly on board with pushing the inactive slot?

Another error. That's annoying ik. Sorry.

In post 320, Iconeum wrote:UNVOTE:

I have no real interest in lynching the gif master himself because, well, gifs

Spoiler:

In post 320, Iconeum wrote: Solid townread in Klick

VOTE: kop

terrible ISO, even worse sheep

@Nippleflips

In post 341, Datisi wrote:Alright, here's where I am right now: (most to least town)

Billy

- I feel like he's playing like classic Town!Billy. Plus, I think scum!Billy would've tried to pocket me (rather than downgrading his TR), especially as my lynch is starting to get more and more likely.

If billy were scum do you think he’d be thinking that you’re the biggest one he has to watch out for because of your history? What is billy like as scum?

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Klick

- Still having the same vibes from him as in the beginning.

Meeep

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

A50

- Granted, we've been in the game together for only a short while, so this is subject to change, but he seems towny so far. Plus I can feel being confused about reads.

I agree with this one. But does anyone know what scum A50 is capable of?

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Tchill

- He feels genuine, at least enough for D1.

Still have to go back & iso to see if i feel the same. I just hade doing that stuff on mobile, & i was at work yesterday & going in today so that’s probably not gonna happen today either. Unless I get bored out of my mind & waant to stare at a tiny screen for 30 min the verdict is out still tbh

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Icon

- I know posting gifs and fooling around is his style, but he seems to be almost pushing it.

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Emperor

- I don't see why such activity couldn't be coming from scum who's purposefully trying to have such a playstyle.

Are you trying to set me up? Cos I swear when i was doing it to you it was a accident

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Luca

- Their posts seem... fake? I can't explain it well, but I just feel their posts are so devoid of life, like they're cold and calculated. It could be just their playstyle, but it's giving me bad vibes.

In post 341, Datisi wrote:

Kop

- I mean, yeah.

While I'm fine with voting Kop here, they feel like low-hanging fruit, so I'm gonna VOTE: Luca

In post 348, Iconeum wrote:

In post 346, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 344, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: kop

can we pile up here please? 2 posts for the duration of this game isn't phenomenal, maybe we can squeeze his thoughts out of him

Has Datisi’s catch-up affected your read on her?

My early game and most of D1 play revolves around activity. I pressure people into saying stuff/doing things when I feel they haven't done so. Some say that's easily fakes as scum, which is true, but I think it's a good strategy that gives town information to work with later in the game.

After I called Datisi out, all of a sudden we have a readslist and Luca engaging with Datisi over it. It hasn't exactly shifted my read to better or worse but I'm confident it will help us in the long run.

This post at first makes me feel good, then it makes me kind of uneasy. I think the uneasiness is paranoia, but I wanted document my feelings

In post 355, Luca Blight wrote:@Datisi:It seemed like you were expecting scum to be discussing something more specific

(I also wasn’t aware of the no day chat)

so I was wondering what your thoughts were.

Yay! I’m not the only one who doesn’t pay attention

In post 361, Iconeum wrote:Nippleflips (not a bad choice, but your motivation was lacking), and NOT the slot you think was 'faking' it or who's post are 'devoid of life'?

I’m always great to interact with



Also. Probably will have thoughts for this interaction. I’m waiting to see where it goes first

In post 364, Luca Blight wrote:Busy atm so can’t keep up with the live chat, so bear with me.

In post 358, Datisi wrote:

In post 355, Luca Blight wrote:@Datisi:It seemed like you were expecting scum to be discussing something more specific (

I also wasn’t aware of the no day chat

) so I was wondering what your thoughts were.

Huh. You didn't read all the game rules? And when going through my ISO later on, you didn't mention it?

pedit: yes, I would say so. Also I realize now "devoid of life" might have been too harsh, but I'll stick with fake.

I actually did read the game rules but I forgot about it.

What should I have mentioned?

I wasn't alone for but a single moment in this vast dark dark world

In post 376, Billy Pilgrim wrote:At this point, the scummiest thing I've seen is Kop. 2 posts across what was basically a week. I'll let that slide a bit because he says he's having internet problems, but he drops back in just to sheep onto the Emperor wagon. And he literally just signed off on Icon at that point. If he's not at L-1, I'm comfortable putting him there (so consider this intent to go there). If he's there already at L-1 then that's enough pressure to bring him back hopefully.

Yeah i find it sus that you can have internet issues but it works enough to be caught up, or caught up enough to vote on a wagon that at the time looked like it may have gone somewhere

In post 389, Iconeum wrote:I need to do something to catch up to Nippleflips ya know. It even produced some good content

anyone still doesn't believe Billy is town?

Yeah. It really did.

Alright waffle block is being updated
ME, BILLY, & ICON

In post 394, Iconeum wrote:oh god the gif only game needs to happen

Is that a thing!?!? If it is i need /in

In post 395, Datisi wrote:using other people's games for advertising smdh

fo real though that fakehammer was lame. why you gotta scare poor Billy like that?

In post 396, Iconeum wrote:I was bored and wanted to joke around. Reaction fishing in the meanwhile.

I've done and said all I wanted to say and now it's a waiting game until people start to wake up or have access to computers. Might as well have some fun, eh.

I actually think it was a great thing to happen. Now anyone who doubts Billy’s alinement will be referred to that.

It would suck if icon & billy were scum cos like its over for us if so. Cos I’m cozy af in this pocket rn

Sticking with my gut, fuck the paranoia. They’re town :nod:

In post 400, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 399, Datisi wrote:@Luca
There was no need for you to mention it. However, you kinda strike me as a type of player who would try to get as much info out there as he can, and would therefore mention it in the passing? It's nothing major, but it's a thought I'd gotten.

I’m not really that kind of player; I often choose to hold back certain things for various reasons, but also sometimes try to mix it up a bit. It did cross my mind to mention that I had myself forgotten about the day chat, but what use would it have been? I doubt anyone would have just taken my word for it, so I left it out.

I mean whoever doesn’t take your word could have just been sent to the rules :shrug:

Idk why I’m commenting on this cos its really not gonna help with alinement in my opinion

Maybe I’m just trying to not let icon pass me. :DoubleShrug:

In post 406, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 372, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: kop

What the hell icon... A little AtE and datisi is town again?

That is a good point. The end of that interaction felt bad. Like not complete? Cos my feelings for datisi got worse by that point. Why did you change your vote icon?

Damn. But the waffle block...

In post 411, Tchill13 wrote:@luca

Datisi and icon are both nitpicking rn and they both pushed the inactive slot. The least productive thing they could have done. When did they do this?

When datisi was being pressured more than she has been the entire game so far.

A majority of the push if not all came & started from icon right?

I have more to say about this (hopefully i dont forget) but I want icon to respond to my question first

In post 415, Tchill13 wrote:Datisi and icon. My apologies.

Oh i thought you were going over another possible team but kept icon on both of them

In post 421, Tchill13 wrote: It was good to see but the quick vote change I hadn't come upon yet immediately redacted the intention of 366 to begin with. I didn't know he was about to vote switch again immediately.

I think I had voted you, he was 2nd... Why does he call you out for lurking with obviously no real intent to build a push against you?

He immediately votes the inactive slot WITH the person he just called out.

Shows that his push wasn't too genuine imo.

As soon as i got the waffle block

Btw

& i finished in time to where I’m not going to be late for work too.

Well. I might be late but not cos of mafia. Ya boy’s hungry

So less gifs till tonight moving to mobile

Not a big fan of the hassle it is to post gifs from my phone but it allows for some cushion in between gifs so oh well

I see where tchill is coming from with his analysis, but I don't agree with him that this was a low risk look productive play from Icon. This entire gamestate has been convoluted and confused. There's been very little voting activity. The one time that Icon had cased previously some folks went over to Nips. I don't know that there's scum motivation to take that risk in the current gamestate.