In post 368, Map Wolf wrote:The stuff he has posted seems townie in tone. I'm not as concerned about pressuring him now.
Do you just like the tone? Opinion on substance?
Think the stuff posted is decent, though kind of indecisive.
In post 415, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh yeah, you're right Kanna. Sorry i didn't check Map's ISO in a while and made a noob mistake. Yeah he did argue against GBJ pretty much all day.
Anyway, why don't we check his alignment right now. Map Wolf, the table is clear for you to hammer GBJ. Do it.
We have two days. I won't hammer without giving GBJ a chance to claim.
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:35 am
by Datisi
Hmmm.
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 10:38 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 430, Map Wolf wrote:We have two days. I won't hammer without giving GBJ a chance to claim.
Anyway what chance is that both scums would be out of wagon (Non,Map)?
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:28 am
by NorwegianboyEE
If 1 scum fake claims mason, then the real mason can out him easily. So it is in our interest for the second mason to claim today so we don't accidentally lynch him.