Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:55 pm
Yeah nvm, Luca does bring the RQS thing up quite a few times.
Luca: calls this "Pikachu... any thoughts"In post 391, Luca Blight wrote:Pikachu, you have seemingly ignored my catch-up despite your apparent desire for it earlier.
Why is that?
I think Natsu's point was fair here. Your early activity was being friendly to two slots and not questioning any others.In post 303, Luca Blight wrote:Not really liking the amount of filler in this post.In post 184, Natsu wrote:So far I'm townleaning Hectic and Round one. Hectic has some eccentric, well-honed style of geniusness that is producing information earlier on. Although I'm really not liking the weird naming schemes he's using. Half the time I have no idea who he is talking about. Who is jaiden?
Round One has an idgaf posting style, and overall looks like they know what they're talking about.
I'm kind of scumleaning pikachu, but that might be due to how shallowly he is bumping heads with Round One.
Scumleaning Luca as well for being afk, while only coming out of it to pocket Arthur and myself.
Pretty much null-reading everyone else. I'm finding it pretty silly that people are bringing up scum teams this early. Also, this thread moves too fast at times. I'm hoping the massive amounts of tiny one-line posts dies out. I feel like mass-spamming the thread helps mafia more (looking at pikachu especially on this one). More than town players who say literally nothing. There's shit that I swear I saw of value that I can't even find again after rebrowsing the thread. Guess I'll have to take more frivolous notes.
Why would you scumread me for being afk?
As for pocketing, do you not think my ‘townie point’ in your favour was warranted?
I did exactly the same to you as you did to me.In post 426, Detective Pikachu wrote:Luca: calls this "Pikachu... any thoughts"In post 391, Luca Blight wrote:Pikachu, you have seemingly ignored my catch-up despite your apparent desire for it earlier.
Why is that?
and then has the GALL
to accuse me of misreps
this post reads as "Hey Pikachu you haven't commented to my catchup in the time you were at work, why are you scum?"
Fuck off
ONE PLAYER is not a quarter of the player listIn post 419, Luca Blight wrote:Your catch-up is underwhelming cos you only TR a quarter of the player list
I never fucking misrepped youIn post 430, Luca Blight wrote:I did exactly the same to you as you did to me.
More lies and misdirection.In post 428, Detective Pikachu wrote:9 minutes
that is how long it took me to respond to his catchup once I sat down
and he is BITCHING NONSTOP
about how I refused to comment on his catchup
Lmao, ok. You’re either scum or highly delusional and have no self-awareness.In post 432, Detective Pikachu wrote:I never fucking misrepped youIn post 430, Luca Blight wrote:I did exactly the same to you as you did to me.
Not once
In post 392, Detective Pikachu wrote:I have a life
Time between these posts is 9 minutesIn post 394, Detective Pikachu wrote:ellitells are hit or miss but they aren't always missIn post 319, Luca Blight wrote:your other reason is also BS given I had made 4 RVS posts at that point
what do you like about it? he only commits to a townread on you 0.o
I didn't say wagon analysis is overrated; I said wagon analysis pre-flip is kinda pointlessIn post 324, Natsu wrote:Excuse me but I intentionally helped get Hectic to L-1 in order to have a wagon to analyze. I believe it was Pikachu who said that wagon analysis is overrated (another reason I'm suspect of him, I could have easily lost my last game as scum if people just stared at the L-1 wagons long enough).
?In post 324, Natsu wrote:~Moving onto other players. I still feel like Hectic is a townlean. The tunneling on Arthur could be a scum move.
doing what? bickering or having confidence in my reads?In post 324, Natsu wrote:Even though the bickering you two had seemed manufactured, Pikachu is doing that with everyone he scumreads.
can you identify which posts make you feel this way?In post 347, dsjstr wrote:Hectic/Natsu: Scum - Early on I saw them as a pair. I didn't see real attempts at trying to lynch each other, they then tried to distance themselves.
which posts specifically did you like?In post 357, DkKoba wrote:I come back and see 3 votes on Artur but still not Artur, I feel scammed.
Also, I'm moving Luca into a townlean here.
sure but they look like they're kinda making me lose interest in this game soIn post 386, DkKoba wrote:R1 sounds very innocent idk how to explain it but their tone is so pure i cant ever vote them here
So to be clear, you admit you misrepped meIn post 435, Luca Blight wrote:Once this has calmed down I will go through and show all the times you misrepped me in your portrayals,worse than I did to you.
What do you think of the points I've made on him?In post 314, Luca Blight wrote:I can’t help but feel Arthur is an easy target based on what he’s posted so far. It’s not spectacular, but I don’t see anything patricianly scummy about it, and I liked the tone of his defiant post greeting the thread.
I’m happy for the lynch today to be me or you - that is necessary because at best this is a distraction.In post 434, Detective Pikachu wrote:Seriously if you cannot demonstrate I actually misrepped you in your next post, I'm going to refuse to move my vote from you for the remainder of the game
You can't spam that accusation without substantiating it
Why is it a distraction? Is it a distraction because I scumread you, or is it a distraction because you responded to a scumread by intentionally misrepresenting my posts--a point you admit?In post 439, Luca Blight wrote:I’m happy for the lynch today to be me or you - that is necessary because at best this is a distraction.
I admit that my portrayal was a misrep in the same manner of yours. That’s why I made it - to give you a piece of your own medicine and show you it sucks to be misrepped.In post 437, Detective Pikachu wrote:So to be clear, you admit you misrepped meIn post 435, Luca Blight wrote:Once this has calmed down I will go through and show all the times you misrepped me in your portrayals,worse than I did to you.
Here you go again - zoning in on a fraction and ignoring the context.In post 441, Detective Pikachu wrote:Why is it a distraction? Is it a distraction because I scumread you, or is it a distraction because you responded to a scumread by intentionally misrepresenting my posts--a point you admit?In post 439, Luca Blight wrote:I’m happy for the lynch today to be me or you - that is necessary because at best this is a distraction.
Here you say i quoted everyone without giving a position on anyone. That is a blatant misrep.In post 407, Detective Pikachu wrote:Luca: "I'm going to quote something by everyone in the game and then commit to not giving a position on them! Also I'm going to take literally every thing Pika says and say it's a misrep even though literally none of it is!"
Town: "Hmm Luca looks town"
Pika:
Spoiler:
like j/w but how does this come from a town POV? This is just sickeningIn post 442, Luca Blight wrote:I admit that my portrayal was a misrep in the same manner of yours. That’s why I made it - to give you a piece of your own medicine and show you it sucks to be misrepped.
Hyperbole is not the same as "misrep"In post 445, Luca Blight wrote:Here you say i quoted everyone without giving a position on anyone. That is a blatant misrep.
Here you make out I said you should TR me for not giving a shit about this game. I never said that or anything of the sort, so again you’re misrepping my position.In post 406, Detective Pikachu wrote:Pikachu: "Why is Luca posting everywhere on site except here? Why doesn't he care about this game?"
Luca: "WHY ARE YOU SCUMREADING ME FOR NOT ANSWERING RQS QUESTIONS????????"
Pikachu: "Actually I just don't really see you interacting here, but if you've been busy then I'm curious about your solve."
Luca: "YOU'RE MISREPPING ME! YOU SHOULD TOWNREAD ME FOR NOT GIVING A SHIT ABOUT THIS GAME!!!!"
Fuck off
If you're town you're never endgame material for me at this point so what's the difference
I misrepped you 0 timesIn post 444, Luca Blight wrote:YES, I deliberately misrepped you once because you continually misrepped me about 10 times.