Mafiascum.net

The disingenuous ‘tentativeness’ makes it even worse imo.

In post 424, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 423, Luca Blight wrote:Before that he seemed to side with me over you.

show me this

Read his posts.

He made negative comments about you and none about me, until I became suspected.

I feel that's still different from saying you are town then voting you afterwards
I think Quag definitely comes off as "don't mind me" sort of player but I don't see the opportunism

My fear with a Quag lynch really is that if that slot flips town we are back to square 1 tomorrow
not a lot of associations going on with lurk-ish slots

Although tbh I'm starting to not see much else lynch opportunities.
Quag or Ald
rest seems flat out incorrect to do

I was also thinking skitt but she's the kind of player that will probably get nightkilled before LYLO if she is town considering people are often scared of her

VOTE: Quag
trust the vig instinct I guess

In post 427, nomnomnom wrote:I feel that's still different from saying you are town then voting you afterwards
I think Quag definitely comes off as "don't mind me" sort of player but I don't see the opportunism

You see what you want to see, which was my point.

Luca’s opportunism was a thing because it suited your agenda. Quags’ opportunism isn’t a thing because it doesn’t suit your agenda.

What agenda

Do you have a read on Aldu?

It's the same thing as Quag except he's even more lurkish
both these slots feel like they're basically coming by after all our discussions to say things that are more or less opiniated
Ald's stuff definitely feels way less opiniated and more bystander-ish than Quag, though

In post 433, nomnomnom wrote:What agenda

Your agenda as scum, given I still believe you’re scum.

You were desperate to frame me as scummy in any possible way, hence I was ‘opportunistic’.

Quags’ vote didn’t step on your toes at all, so from a scum perspective you barely noticed it.

I don't really know where you read the town intent
he has 10 posts max and a lot of them are fluff and the rest are questions and talking about information rather than analysis

pedit: What agenda does scum!me has to talk with you about quag, debating about whether he's opportunistic or not, and me ending up voting him?

VOTE: Ald
second guessing myself here

In post 437, nomnomnom wrote:I don't really know where you read the town intent
he has 10 posts max and a lot of them are fluff and the rest are questions and talking about information rather than analysis

pedit: What agenda does scum!me has to talk with you about quag, debating about whether he's opportunistic or not, and me ending up voting him?

Well, your vote didn’t last very long...

It's a vote on either of those
I'm hesitant on Quag and I think your tunnel on me is affecting how you read other people
There is no opportunism in Quag's posting. If I end up voting quag's it will be for anything else but that

I don’t know about Aldu, my view of the game is warped atm by assuming you’re scum.

Your push on me just felt so desperately scummy that I’m not sure I can look past it. Some of your recent stuff hasn’t been as bad, but you’ve been forced into working with me rather than against me.

I wanted to force a 1v1 because it felt to me you were trying to do what Quag and Ald are doing right now and that felt extremely off character from someone like you
I certainly am not lynching a neap claim today so your lynch is out of the question

In post 440, nomnomnom wrote:It's a vote on either of those
I'm hesitant on Quag and I think your tunnel on me is affecting how you read other people
There is no opportunism in Quag's posting. If I end up voting quag's it will be for anything else but that

What would Quags have had to do for you to consider it opportunistic?

claiming to have a soft tr on you then going on you later
then that definitely looks opportunistic as momentum builds against you
I see what you're saying and he's been definitely suspicious of us 2, but I'm not entirely convinced that's the angle I want to take when analyzing my choices today

In post 439, Luca Blight wrote:Well, your vote didn’t last very long...

So why was I opportunistic but Quags wasn’t?

I never said you were opportunistic, in the first place
I said that your reads didn't feel like there was too much conviction behind them aside from your case on me which I found suspicious coming from what I know from your towngame
and it seems other people agreed, so really I wasn't the only one thinking this

convince me why I should vote Quags over Ald right now, that isn't about opportunism

In post 445, Looker wrote:

In post 439, Luca Blight wrote:Well, your vote didn’t last very long...

how about you contribute to the conversation
what's your opinion on Quags/Ald

Oh, I thought you called me opportunistic. My bad.

I’m not convincing you about anyone rn. Still trying to work you out atm.