Mafiascum.net

In post 310, Raya36 wrote:

In post 305, NDMath wrote: Budding's part of my play style. Though I wasn't trying to with that post.

Buddying is part of your town playstyle or do you mean scum?

Play style. I'm generally more concerned about my townreads not being hung than my scumreads being hung. It's also easier for me to gage whether I'm alienating myself from the thread or not when there's someone who townreads me enough to change their read in such a case.

In post 356, springlullaby wrote: As chain leader, I'd like the following:
- nominate your towniest read atm.
- nominate your scummiest read atm.
Please, thanks.

Opposite of midway...
T: TSE
S: unwnd

In post 423, midwaybear wrote:Honestly, I don't think spring not passing the chain is too big of an issue atm.

If they spend have the day not passing the chain or proposing a group, everyone else is going to have to make a mildly rushed decision is the only concern I see.

LMAO a game just ended and I lost because of stupidity and a dumb town being modkilled.
XD.
I legit had the game won IDK wtf happened.

I was accurate in this game.
http://duelistgroundz.com/index.php?/to ... nt-4172486

I was “Chrome”

Everything I said he was accurate.
Macer and Fiend were the only possible scum left.
I was reading Macer scum over Fiend because Macer played so bad IMO.

I called the god damn “Town Circle”

Fact - I don’t lose games due to my own mistake but rather to me not convincing others to follow me.
Take a look and see for yourself.

Faint and Build were confirmed town in my eyes but no one seen it because everyone was blind sighted and couldn’t realize the difference between a TvT - TvT
And a SvT.

Like both Jazz - Build/Haz and Jazz - Faint Interactions we’re both TvT.
No my fault no one couldn’t see it. You don’t need logic you need eyes and you need to feel it. You need to feel what they do in a sense.

Find it funny how Sage pushed me to try and make me look scummy was scum them.
And they replace Out because their scum buddy died.
But their excuse was because the “two Town were attack each other as a player rather as a game”
Lol. If someone takes things too far just tell them to lay off each other and go somewhere else.
I told each of them they were wrong but none wanted to listen.
I suppose one of these days I’ll make people listen lol.

Nah if I’m being completely honest.
This game might be another loss for me like that one.
But the best thing I can do is give my reads, give my final thoughts before I die.
And wish you all luck and hope you all follow through with those reads of mine.

Heck, I’m like a role in itself.

The following is a scum scummy post made by Sage that game responding to my post:

“This post rubs me SO wrong right here. In essence it means absolutely nothing, imparts absolutely no insight. It's more of a call to attention like "hey look! I'm making pro town posts!" Chrome has been absolutely non-committal, and doesn't actually seem to be interested in putting themselves out there and committing to anything or anyone.

Most of their posts are just like this but this one really sets off alarms in my head, especially considering it's such a sly set-up to start a bandwagon on just about anyone who might take the bait. It's basically implying "if you vote faint, (or anyone else I can spin to be a 'safe lynch') you are scum, and I get to jump on you."

Making people afraid to engage, and discuss shit is classic scum behavior, or at the very least very poor town gameplay. We want people to be talking, especially day 1. Announcing to the world that you'll be watching and harrassing anyone who comments on a vote train is just beyond bad for town.“

In post 143, unwnd wrote:

In post 120, NDMath wrote:I townread TSE/BeeBoy/Dunn.

Pinkball tunnelling on Sircakez and Raya is interesting?
Not a huge fan of the way Sircakez ended mechanical discussion.
My top townreads are the same as raya's, so either they're apparent or raya has a Town mindset. I'd assume apparent.

I really don't like this post for some reason haha

In post 142, unwnd wrote:I'm really surprised TrueSoulEnergy hasn't been buried in votes yet every post he makes is not thrilling

Unwnd’s Posts.

bruh

In post 432, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:The following is a scum scummy post made by Sage that game responding to my post:

“This post rubs me SO wrong right here. In essence it means absolutely nothing, imparts absolutely no insight. It's more of a call to attention like "hey look! I'm making pro town posts!" Chrome has been absolutely non-committal, and doesn't actually seem to be interested in putting themselves out there and committing to anything or anyone.

Most of their posts are just like this but this one really sets off alarms in my head, especially considering it's such a sly set-up to start a bandwagon on just about anyone who might take the bait. It's basically implying "if you vote faint, (or anyone else I can spin to be a 'safe lynch') you are scum, and I get to jump on you."

Making people afraid to engage, and discuss shit is classic scum behavior, or at the very least very poor town gameplay. We want people to be talking, especially day 1. Announcing to the world that you'll be watching and harrassing anyone who comments on a vote train is just beyond bad for town.“

Can you actually believe people call this town motivated LOL.

I log on and I see there are 8 new posts, but they are all from you.
pedit: I can sorta see it being town motivated idk. Does seem a bit over the top though, but that's like you this game

In post 436, midwaybear wrote:I log on and I see there are 8 new posts, but they are all from you.

And he's talking about a different game on another site

Sad part is people here RN would probably Town read Sage for that if they were in this game.

Some people at least.
Whatever, back to doing my own thing.
Just thought I’d share another loss game with you because I lose to others mistakes.

is this AtE?

In post 430, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:This game might be another loss for me like that one.

The chain hasn't even been passed once

In post 441, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 430, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:This game might be another loss for me like that one.

The chain hasn't even been passed once

LOL
Dunnstral is my favorite.

I am just chilling until the chain gets passed around.
This voteless, chainless gamestate is kind of rough.

spring give it to me
you were my first SE lol

In post 425, NDMath wrote:

In post 310, Raya36 wrote:

In post 305, NDMath wrote: Budding's part of my play style. Though I wasn't trying to with that post.

Buddying is part of your town playstyle or do you mean scum?

Play style. I'm generally more concerned about my townreads not being hung than my scumreads being hung. It's also easier for me to gage whether I'm alienating myself from the thread or not when there's someone who townreads me enough to change their read in such a case.

Oh that's interesting. We're a bit opposite in playstyle then.

Starbuck's catchup seemed natural to me.

TSE is saying so much random unrelated stuff about other games. And then there were those walls with definitions. It's like he just wants his post count up. But he's being so obvious about it being unrelated to the game.

I'll still be around though if the chain happens to start getting passed around

In post 415, beeboy wrote:

In post 411, SirCakez wrote:I agree his lack of real gameplay is suspicious but I SRed him for the same thing in Guns and Roses and was wrong there so I'm hesitant.

His ISO in that game is a lot better then his ISO here.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... ect[]=6983

He is more aggressive and is less fluffy.
Idk just feels like scum who doesn't want to commit to anything early/ have his town reputation chase him by having a good day 1.

Later on he was fine
In the early stage there he was similarly useless as to here


I agree spring needs to pass the chain

The thing that makes this game especially annoying for me above all else is that without the ability to 'vote' you kinda have to filter things out more efficiently. Votes pretty much condense all your arguments. Sometimes you can even say way more just voting someone than anything. Right now you have players who I think would probably be voting each other (or something to close to it) and I'd be able to determine what it all means in the long run. In an instance where there were votes, I'm just going to go ahead and say that TSE/ND probably wouldn't be voting me. I'd also say that I think TSE/ND don't seem like partners despite both agreeing to dislike me. What's happening here is that one of them is town pursuing a bad thought and the other is scum using that leverage to seem more. In terms of who I give more benefit? I don't really know. TSE is so full of himself that it's bothering me. ND remains steadfast and just going through the motions. Gun to my head I'd give it to TSE.

I had some other things I wanted to hit while I'm here.