Mafiascum.net

In post 376, innocentvillager wrote:if you can't tell im not exactly jumping out of my chair to launch ydrasse but we need someone.

In post 389, innocentvillager wrote:anyway with limited time my vote is on ydrasse we really need to launch this. if everyone wants dunn I'll get that slot too over a no launch for sure.

In post 405, innocentvillager wrote:ugh I was scared you would PR claim bc your boringness does kind of make sense with the pr claim :/

In post 406, innocentvillager wrote:what do we do guys

In post 407, innocentvillager wrote:i feel like I was partly the trigger for switching wagons and I'm SORRY YDRASSE AND TOWN (assuming real claim which feels like it is)

Why do I still think Dunn is town but I will switch there if it's our next best option at this point

In post 411, innocentvillager wrote:should we like, wait for everyone to post and see if there's a cc? how do ccs even work in normals?

DUDE I don't even get this...

i hope im doing the right thing

i am an investigative role

Ayy, powerful enough to know Ydrasse is lying?

VOTE: Ydrasse

In post 419, Battle Mage wrote:

Mod

can we please get a 12 hour extension or something?

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=12027833#p12027833]post 425[/url], Umlaut wrote:

In post 419, Battle Mage wrote:

Mod

can we please get a 12 hour extension or something?

In my judgment, nothing has happened that would warrant an extension. (Note that I will almost never give an extension due to purely "in-game" events.)

I agree, but doesn't hurt to ask!

Also nice pagetop...

all i will say is if you look up my role in the mafiascum wiki it is classified as investigative.

In post 426, innocentvillager wrote:i hope im doing the right thing

i am an investigative role

This is low key scummy because you aren’t specifying what role. I still will vote ydrasse though
VOTE: Ydrasse

In post 428, Umlaut wrote:

In post 419, Battle Mage wrote:

Mod

can we please get a 12 hour extension or something?

In my judgment, nothing has happened to warrant an extension. (Note that I will rarely if ever give an extension due to purely "in-game" events.)

I'd expect nothing less of my good old friend Umlaut. Don't bow down to their demands.

In post 426, innocentvillager wrote:i hope im doing the right thing

i am an investigative role

ah...I think you may as well fullclaim in that case then

i can if you want me to. i just wanted to start with this but it looks like it's good enough to get people back to ydrasse.

i was thinking about cc'ing i just wasn't sure if this warranted a cc as I'm not sure if our roles can be in the same setup. I got two opinions and decided to claim since we have 5 hrs left

It's fine to not specify the role. As long as it's powerful enough, it's fine.

So a Neapolitan or a gunsmith or any kind of regular cop.

If it's a watcher or a tracker, it's little more muddy/risky.

If it's a follower/voyeur, then they could fit together.

In post 430, innocentvillager wrote:all i will say is if you look up my role in the mafiascum wiki it is classified as investigative.

this is too vague. Is your role complete enough that it makes hers implausible?

If not, I'm not down with elimming a claimed investigative on Day 1 - it will resolve itself hopefully if we can avoid too many more PR claims...

In post 404, Dunnstral wrote:Also I'd absolutely quickhammer Ydrasse here if I was mafia since I'm the most likely launch anyway

In post 435, Mafia Goon wrote:It's fine to not specify the role. As long as it's powerful enough, it's fine.

So a Neapolitan or a gunsmith or any kind of regular cop.

If it's a watcher or a tracker, it's little more muddy/risky.

If it's a follower/voyeur, then they could fit together.

Basically this. If you're in that top line, and specifically not limited to number of shots etc, I'm with you.

I am not a watcher or a tracker or a follower or a voyeur. I have no modifiers on my ability

In post 434, innocentvillager wrote:i can if you want me to. i just wanted to start with this but it looks like it's good enough to get people back to ydrasse.

i was thinking about cc'ing i just wasn't sure if this warranted a cc as I'm not sure if our roles can be in the same setup. I got two opinions and decided to claim since we have 5 hrs left

yes, confirm if you are in the top row per Mafia Goon's last post, and not limited on number of shots.

I'm mostly worried that we could end up miselimming Ydrasse and then you in successive days if we get this wrong.

You should just full claim.

In post 439, innocentvillager wrote:I am not a watcher or a tracker or a follower or a voyeur. I have no modifiers on my ability

Ok, works for me.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Ydrasse

In post 441, midwaybear wrote:You should just full claim.

Don't do this, Inin.

If you're confirming you're in that top row, it's all good.

I wonder where stuff like a Traffic Analyst or Psychologist would lie...

Probably somewhere in-between row 1 and 2 - maybe enough to still warrant launching Ydrasse.

Traffic Analyst would warrant an Ydrasse launch.

Psychologist would not, in my view.

I'm ambivalent on a full claim - it doesn't really matter. I think InnocentVillager needs to be confident enough that Ydrasse can't possibly be town, so if Ydrasse flips town we can guarantee InnocentVillager as scum.

otherwise we're basically throwing the game.

this could be a quick win!

I think he should full claim so he doesn’t have the excuse of “well I thought it was enough: and we can discuss.

In post 446, Battle Mage wrote:I think InnocentVillager needs to be confident enough that Ydrasse can't possibly be town, so if Ydrasse flips town we can guarantee InnocentVillager as scum.

Agreed. Bothers me a bit that InnocentVillager hasn't actually said that yet.

Are you confident that your role precludes Ydrasse's claim from being true?