Mafiascum.net

In post 391, Battle Mage wrote:At least partly because it would be hilarious if we flip him Day 1 when he said it would be impossible

I don’t think I said it would be impossible, I said I didn’t think you’d be able to get my flip D1. As in, when I’ve been mis guillo’d it’s generally been because there’s been a broad sense of suspicion of me from town slots in the thread which scum has either tacitly supported or they’ve white knighted me. I think in terms of /actual/ 1v1s that have been forced by me or by someone else I’ve been the one flipped in those once ever when I got into it with RC

Thanks gypyx!

pagetop

fuck

Alonzo (0) :

Tayl0r Swift (1) : Shellyc

TheGoldenParadox (1) : Iconeum

Iconeum (1) : piisirrational

iamausername (0) :

Datisi (0) :

teacher (0) :

Battle Mage (1) : Noraa

piisirrational (1) : bob3141

bob3141 (2) : Alonzo ; iamausername

shellyc (1) : Tayl0r Swift

Noraa (2) : Datisi ; TheGoldenParadox

Menalque (2) : Teacher ; Battle Mage

Not Voting (1) : Menalque

In post 414, Datisi wrote:what do you mean when you say fence-sitty? like taking a stance on a conflict is... the opposite of that?

ok maybe i phrased it wrong

I'll call it afraid to call people out? if you get what i mean

oh here's the dragon

In post 327, shellyc wrote:but I concur with the taylor ping a lot. teacher gut townlean + catchup logic was easy to follow

agreed on the teacher townlean, though when you get back to me, remind me about something here

In post 334, Iconeum wrote:

In post 116, Menalque wrote:I feel moderately happy calling datisi town at this point

i think flipping menalque at this point is probably +chance to win the game

should i be worried you're saying this while quoting a post where he's calling me town, asking for a friend

In post 339, Iconeum wrote:

In post 130, Noraa wrote:All Datisi did was vote without giving a reason. Thats at most a little antitown/scummy

imagine voting someone without a reason in rvs

outragious

datisi how dare you

but ico, i did have a reason

In post 343, Iconeum wrote:

In post 133, Datisi wrote:i think it's +++scum and you should probably out the neighbourhood and poweryeet his ass

excuse me?

how serious was this comment?

as said later, not at all

zzz insert obligatory "omgus is not scum!indicative" here

oh, i missed 195 yesterday
why shouldn't your gutreads be taken into account because they're "just gut"
how is that not a read
-- this post was made by the "all my reads are gutreads, fuck logic" gang

In post 362, Iconeum wrote:if i'm wrong about what i'm seeing going in with menal/dats then this is just a scum opening

hmm?

In post 387, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: goldenparasox

In post 388, Iconeum wrote:that typo is funny as hell

reported

In post 389, Iconeum wrote:the first quote is GP's opening, which is a complaint about activity being unhelpfull, despite him getting a scumread out of it. Not normal towniel logic. Not to mention hopping on what seems to be the popular opening wagon with reasons best described as... not there.

Second quote is a fencesit where GP explicitely doesn't town v townread the fight, picks noraa as the scum in between the 2, but lets open a door where he can scumread either of them, even in a team. There is not a single word of logic behind this thinking nor an explanation.

This furthers my belief that noraa v bm is in fact town v town
and GP's position is a scum opening that i've seen quite a bit recently.

ico can we talk about this once i manage to get to the present
what's the non-townie logic in the first part?

ugh, i've been staring at this for 5 minutes and i'm not sure how to articulate what i'm thinking

remind me, whose scum openings were like this recently?

ok i'm almost there

In post 421, Menalque wrote:Yeh, I don’t think reading it as TvT is /necessarily/ scum!indicative. I /do/ think that saying you think it’s TvT and then voting a slot completely unrelated to anything that’s happened so far in the game is, and I do think it’s /somewhat/ scum indicative to say it’s TvT after some of the posts Taylor made catching up

the word "somewhat" kinda pings as FENCE-SITTING.

this is the correct implementation of the word

that stream of logic is easy to follow from datisi and the way they articulate their thoughts are geniune and pretty indicative of a solving mindset? so +townpoints to datisi

I think you’re mixing up fence-sitting with qualified confidence levels

In post 430, Datisi wrote:should i be worried you're saying this while quoting a post where he's calling me town, asking for a friend

probably

In post 431, shellyc wrote:the word "somewhat" kinda pings as FENCE-SITTING.this is the correct implementation of the word

it's not

In post 430, Datisi wrote:ico can we talk about this once i manage to get to the presentwhat's the non-townie logic in the first part?

'i scumread player x after reading the game'

also: 'i think the game is all spam and utterly useless'

what doesn't comply here?

Icon why did you out the fakeclaim

Like you weren’t under any pressure really

I wasn’t under a lot of pressure
Even if I were scum it’s not like I could use that to push you to an elim bc when you flipped it would prove I was lying

So I guess I’m struggling to see what the town!otivation was in you shutting that down early

In post 435, Menalque wrote:VOTE: shelly

HMMMMMMMMM
what if menal is scum

menal care to explain the naked vote?

2020 join date misusing a term isnt that unexpected

Why is me voting you something that’s more likely to be from scum!me than town!me?

burden of proficiency

In post 438, Menalque wrote:Icon why did you out the fakeclaim

dude i love and like you all the same but

WILL YOU STOP PUTTING ME IN THESE FUCKING POSITIONS IN GAMES ALREADY

it's almost meme-worthy

Yeh okay, I feel like you’re trying to pocket me, and your reads/takes generally have an ephemerality to then that makes me feel like they’re not real, and I think the most concrete example of that if your flip on BMvNoraa from TvS!likely (when you were entering thread and giving reasons for TRing me) to TvT!likely when it seemed like more support was being voiced for that slightly later on

In post 445, Iconeum wrote:

In post 438, Menalque wrote:Icon why did you out the fakeclaim

dude i love and like you all the same but

WILL YOU STOP PUTTING ME IN THESE FUCKING POSITIONS IN GAMES ALREADY

it's almost meme-worthy

bc it only gets funny if it’s always with you

If it’s starting to cause you genuine distress I will stop tho

In post 440, Menalque wrote:So I guess I’m struggling to see what the town!otivation was in you shutting that down early

no u