Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:13 am
That's a convenient answer but fine... I can play nice for now.In post 417, unwnd wrote:Spoiler:
I wanted more out of you, so I maintained my original position to see how you (and others) would react
That's a convenient answer but fine... I can play nice for now.In post 417, unwnd wrote:Spoiler:
I wanted more out of you, so I maintained my original position to see how you (and others) would react
not for me, but I also didn't think all his stuff was fillerIn post 424, Mikul wrote:I'm just off in left field. Is no one else really just pinging scum with quiet. Like my Spidey sense is vibrating so fast, it's euphoric. Everything about him is off
no he's definitely moved down in my estimation, i just want to keep the pressure on lunar right nowIn post 424, Mikul wrote:I'm just off in left field. Is no one else really just pinging scum with quiet. Like my Spidey sense is vibrating so fast, it's euphoric. Everything about him is off
1. Illwei is going about the game in a way that reads new to this form, not too tryhard, but genuinely looking for information and scumhunting. Examples that support this for me:why's your townread so strong?
In post 331, Illwei wrote:I don't like this line of reasoning, it seems worse than an Info kill to me. It's voting someone out because you think you won't be able to read them later?? and you're kinda preflipping Turtle there as Village.
To summarize 1, Illwei is consistently offering quality and specific information when posting, and I read that towny.In post 92, Illwei wrote:TLDR;
1) I Think BB's playstyle is not AI, as it is his playstyle it seems.
2) It feels like Unwnd is trying to use his playstyle as an easy kill
3) I have more thoughts but am keeping them to myself, as I want to see how things play out a bit first.
Sweating as a joke as mafia, I just don't see.In post 69, Illwei wrote:of course this kinda, doesn't apply as much to more experienced players, but hey! it's a newbie game, right? *sweats*
This is a good example of Illwei's posting where they demonstrate both attentive reads and also, that tone? uncertainty? I'm struggling to describe it exactly, but I just get towny pings from both the logic + the way it is presented.In post 145, Illwei wrote:This is definitely not me meaning to answer for him, so I hope it's not taken that way: but after looking at Lunar's responses, they seem like something that would make me want to leave my vote on Lunar if I was BBmola. so that's something that slightly confuses me.
I also think that a single vote doesn't do much in terms of pressure. Lunar stayed strangely calm during that, even putting what could have been a self-defense vote disguised with fake meaning on BBmola. The whole situation feels awkwardly like some sort of Distancing to me.
I would say that the whole thing feels...off. somehow. filing that away in "think about later" as there's too many directions this could go and I don't want to waste anyone's time talking about all of them and...how equally unlikely they all are...
I read this as someone trying to remember exactly what they said. For whatever reason, I imagine scum Illwei wouldn't be willing to wing it like that. I don't think their uncertainty here is faked. I don't think scum Illwei would be alright posting something they were that uncertain in, given the chance of a slip.In post 145, Illwei wrote:Oh, yeah I did. and...I said Quiet? was more suspicious? huh. I don't know how... Well, maybe before I was looking at everything quiet was saying as if they had already flipped scum? ...huh. Well, that's, the above bit, my answer to...uh...let me find...it..
In post 145, Illwei wrote:Tbf, I was pretty tempted to vote on BBmola to put him at E-1, just...to see what would happen .
Those interactions are also why I intend to hammer Lunar if Illwei doesn't unvote. I'm calling Illwei on their intent a bit.
In a world where you shoot me and I flip red, who is my partner?In post 429, Mikul wrote:Times I wish I had a day vig.
I'm having a hard time reading ringers. Is there anything I can do to read them day1?In post 433, Mikul wrote:Either way I think one of the ringers is scum.
does this mean you are relatively certain it's both of us? Or like, that if you were forced to give an answer, it would be us two.In post 435, Mikul wrote:G2MH it's probably you and uwnd.
This is a really good point. With the number of questions I ask, and the amount I post...safebet222 wrote:So mikul, you're saying that their opening salvo was scum theater? IDK about that.'re saying that their opening salvo was scum theater? IDK about that.
That's funny, because I was really trying to tone down how unsure I was. It seems like it didn't work, though.In post 409, unwnd wrote:Not to single the newbies out, but it's very interesting in the way you guys have been having discourse right now. A lot of wordy analysis but I also remain a bit unsettled about it. Mr. Turtle's #385 highlights this opinion, where I feel like a majority of the content is made with uncertainty. A lot of "I don't know" or "It could be this way" or even posing two possible scenarios and highlighting them both in your posts. I know this is likely coming from inexperience but you don't have to tell everyone what you're thinking, especially if you don't know.If you don't know something: Ask. Ask your other players if you can't understand their intentions. Or..make a statement that asserts a position.You don't always need to be shamefully honest and say things like "Well I don't know" and "Mostly gut". I would attribute that behavior as a waffling scum who is just exaggerating a townie mindset.
Yeah, I'm worried about being wrong. That's also what'd be keeping me from making commitment.In post 409, unwnd wrote:I'm willing to give leeway on this however because I believe most of you are trying and I'm not ready to believe (You) Mr. Turtle is just waffling as scum and trying to exaggerate a townie mindset. Mr. Turtle, are you worried about being wrong? What's keeping you from making commitment? Don't worry about being wrong, you won't be judged and I think it's a skill to not be afraid to be wrong. If we all played in such a guarded way where we had to back up our thought processes with another scenario in our head just to double-check, it'd be really hard to determine what people mean. Any speculation you feel can likely be solved through interaction and again, asking questions. Do you suspect Mikul? Why? Try to summarize it for me and don't worry about it being gut or anything like that. It's perfectly fine to just have a feeilng, I certainly just have one with Lunar and am just leading with it.
Damn, I'm sorry. I'm having a ton of fun, and I don't think anyone expects anyone to be right day1. Didn't intend to make it feel like I was jumping at you, it just sucked to get sussed by you right away. Mikul's been doing it all day1, so it's not like you were confirmed wrong or anything. There's clearly reasons to be sus of me if Mikul is, and I've pinged bad for other people too.In post 441, Mr Turtle wrote:My fear of being wrong was immediately re-inforced when Quiet jumped at me, pointing out the flaws in my logic (see #385).
I've mod killed myself then janitored my flip to convince people I'm town to put my scum partners ahead. I could literally see two people flaming at each other and still think they are both scum.In post 439, safebet222 wrote:So mikul, you're saying that their opening salvo was scum theater? IDK about that.
the way you speak about those interactions make me like you a little bit more, but him lessIn post 430, quiet wrote:3. These interactions:In post 145, Illwei wrote:Tbf, I was pretty tempted to vote on BBmola to put him at E-1, just...to see what would happen .Those interactions are also why I intend to hammer Lunar if Illwei doesn't unvote. I'm calling Illwei on their intent a bit.
@Illwei You placed your lunar vote first and have not changed your mind. I would like:
An updated reason why you think we should still elim Lunar today
Who you think likely partners are for scum Lunar
If you want to unvote then revote later when you've had time to make your decision, that's fine. I'll be voting in about 2 days, or if you commit to staying on Lunar, unless Lunar or someone else steps in with a good reason not to do so.