Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:31 pm
actually no i wanna decide if the guy dies or not
UNVOTE:
UNVOTE:
Yeah, that.In post 426, Krazy wrote:So basically it's "read the iso preflipping them red and see if it fits"?
I'm intrigued: unpack this for me?In post 376, Alisae wrote:like ur a red/green player and I play blue.
FTR, I don't think you're scum white knighting Chosen, nor do I think you're masons. I'm more interested in how Italiano says he's going about trying to sort you and Chosen.In post 379, marcistar wrote:Tbh, I could always be scum white knighting chosen is a possibility, but i think everybody will need to judge that for themselves. It isn't my intention to white knight them, and if I really wanted to I would've placed them as an actual town read. I just want them to have a chanceIn post 331, Cantripmancer wrote:Also, I'm confused. I feel like Marci's defense of Chosen is being perceived as excessive, so wouldn't it make more sense to postulate that Marci and Chosenmightbe masons rather than discounting the possibility? And wouldn't the logical alternative to explain Marci's defense of Chosen if they'renotmasons be thatMarciis scum white knighting Chosen (if it's unlikely that a townie would be excessive in defending a townie)?![]()
Ah, ok, thanks for clarifying.In post 386, 2ndchosen1 wrote:@cantrip
Kazyan is correct, I've only had the one other game.
I was more pointing out how bad this quote is.
"Shallow and opportunistic votes are the easiest to follow for my small brain getting adjusted to the game, so that's what I'm going with. The push on 2nd made me question my original read, so I went back, reread, and got some weird vibes from- like I said, the lack of analysis in his first few posts and his progressively angrier and more annoyed tone."
IF Meuh is townie then she's not exactly one I'd want to keep around, see Antrax's Guide to Being a Good Townie from the wiki. krazy at least is more brainy about her moves
Like I said, I'm probably seeing your confidence in the wrong light; it's all good.In post 389, Alisae wrote:I'm not sure where you see that but its probably not intentional?In post 384, Cantripmancer wrote:Not super digging what I feel is a condescending tone in your posts, but that's probably just your confidence shining through. Just how experienced are you, if I may ask? You get a townlean, though, for the solving approach.
Either way I consider myself to be pretty experienced and I have a lot of pride in my gameplay.
Can you link me to either of these games? I found this (https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82624) by searching, but didn't see Alisae in the player list...In post 394, Krazy wrote:tbh your rep in to flavor vs hectic was pretty dope
I also remember liking your d1 in baker's wrestling game a lot more than this entrance from you atm
I know this was meant for Krazy, but I'm curious: it feels like you're trying to highlight that you play differently when you're "there" for the full game vs when you replace in. But the game you link in this quote is, for all practical purposes, essentially a rep-in. You didn't see that the game had started until 800+ posts in.In post 397, Alisae wrote:also I don't remember baker's game?
My rep ins compared to me being at the start of the game is fairly different and im a weird if I'm trying to catch-up?
If I showed you this game what would your response be: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=84369
I say this with no offense intended: this made me laugh.
I'm getting a serious "lost innocent" vibe from the majority of her posts, and they sound sincere. That kind of thing is hard to fake, imo.In post 409, Krazy wrote:Yeah maybe she shouldn't be, maybe we need to go into read therapy
Why, if you feel strongly that Chosen is scum?Krazy wrote:Chosen town-->Krazy scum bothers me a bit as well
Alisae was one of the heads of the heads of WondertankIn post 431, Cantripmancer wrote:Can you link me to either of these games? I found this (viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82624) by searching, but didn't see Alisae in the player list...
In post 431, Cantripmancer wrote:@Krazy: Seriously, what % are you at for scum!Chosen? I don't feel strongly about Chosen yet, so I'm tempted to just /barn your read and see how they flip.
I wrote an MD thread about how MtG colors could translate into mafia:In post 431, Cantripmancer wrote:I'm intrigued: unpack this for me?
im part of the wondertank hydraIn post 431, Cantripmancer wrote:Can you link me to either of these games? I found this (viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82624) by searching, but didn't see Alisae in the player list...
he was saying that my rep-ins are usually different from this one no?In post 431, Cantripmancer wrote:I know this was meant for Krazy, but I'm curious: it feels like you're trying to highlight that you play differently when you're "there" for the full game vs when you replace in. But the game you link in this quote is, for all practical purposes, essentially a rep-in. You didn't see that the game had started until 800+ posts in.
who is wk'ing them?In post 433, Krazy wrote:I just... feel like their response to the wagon on them has been to basically shut down and then they got kinda white knighted by a couple slots and it's just really hard to evaluate how that all shakes out without a flip
In post 1, Nexus wrote:Game Rules:
Activity:
- You are expected to post at least once every 48 hours. If you haven't posted for 48 hours, I shall prod you. If you do not respond to the prod within 48 hours (either in thread if it's Day, or via PM during the Night) then I will replace you.
- Similarly, if you require more than three prods, I will force-replace you.
There's nothing here btw. This leads nowhere. You're not going to catch anyone because of this and this isn't ever going to be a reason why that player is scum in a game.In post 38, Harumi Ayasato wrote:Does anyone else find the constant use of emoticons to come off as insincere, or is it just me?
attacks the readlist, not impossible for scum to post.In post 61, Harumi Ayasato wrote:Not terribly AI but I see little point in doing a readslist in page three of a mafia game. They don't really add anything this early.In post 50, Meuh wrote:Alright, let me make a read list.This format may be a bit odd to you guys but ppl used it in other games i've played so...
TTT = Confirmed town
TT = Strong town read
T = Town read
/T = Town lean
/ = Neutral
/M = Mafia lean
M = Mafia read
MM = Strong mafia read
MMM = Confirmed mafia
Nothing = player has provided no input
Kazyan (/T)
Good vibes!![]()
marcistar (/T)
Seems to be contributing to the discussion, messages aren't scummy.![]()
Cantripmancer (/)
Not much input, and the input felt a bit odd.![]()
Harumi Ayasato (/)
Talked a bit but didn't do anything to warrant a townlean![]()
2ndchosen1 ()
Nothing yet
ItalianoVD (/T)
Contributing, messages look like a townie's
eth0s ()
Just voted and left.![]()
Krazy (/T)
Actively contributing, making sure convo happens, but is experienced, so could easily be just be playing as they always do. Plus some of these messages look like they may be trying to pocket Marci? Not a huge deal, but still something I noticed.
![]()
After a certain point, inactivity becomes scummy, but this game just started.
probably not aligned with kazy on re-readIn post 91, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I've already expressed my opinion on meuh's tierlist and the emoticon usage but other than that they haven't really done anything to get my attention.In post 88, Krazy wrote:@harumi, No take on marci or meuh yet?
Can you expand on your kazy read a bit?
Kazy has only posted seventeen times, and quite a few of them are non-substantive, but the few that are seem to be rather focused on calling people out for things he perceives as scummy. This is probably just a playstyle thing, but it makes me wonder.
this kind of shading probably seems more likely to come from scum than town I think?In post 264, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I'm noticing that Meuh's last three posts have almost exclusively been justifying their actions. I'd like them to quickly reiterate who they believe their top candidate for elimination is today, as well as their reason.
this just feels like attacking the slot for the sake of attacking the slotIn post 304, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I do agree with Kazyan that Meuh is inconsistent with their votes, and seems to be very manipulative with how apologetic they are when called out.
Your read on eth0s also implies that you think people voting for you is scummy, which I don't really agree with.
So not looking super good right now. Let's see about 2nd.
how are they not being sincere? I don't feel like this was ever actually explained but i could be missing somethingIn post 305, Harumi Ayasato wrote:2nd hasn't posted as much as Meuh, but it's hard for me to point out anything specifically wrong with them. I'm just getting a bad feeling regarding them, like they're not being sincere.
So I'm going to VOTE: Meuh for now, but 2nd is going on my PoE.
what post?In post 433, Krazy wrote:the way harumi positioned herself on chosen/meuh was almost scummy enough for me to think that was just wolfing