Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:13 pm
vc
Excuse me, but did you mean [VPF, StrangeMatter]? Rockey isn't in this game anymore.In post 428, GrandpaMo wrote:hm. so its more like this.
I am thinking about this pool:
[VFP, rockey, StrangeMatter]
or the other subgroup of
[Hockey, Cows, Bulge]
I feel like those 3 of hockey, cows, bulge there is one PR, one scum, and one VT.
And the other scum lies within the first group.
I won't explain why those groups are combined just yet.
Sorry, I meant VPF, Strange, and Beeze. I forgot you replaced rockey not beeze lolIn post 429, StrangeMatter wrote:Excuse me, but did you mean [VPF, StrangeMatter]? Rockey isn't in this game anymore.In post 428, GrandpaMo wrote:hm. so its more like this.
I am thinking about this pool:
[VFP, rockey, StrangeMatter]
or the other subgroup of
[Hockey, Cows, Bulge]
I feel like those 3 of hockey, cows, bulge there is one PR, one scum, and one VT.
And the other scum lies within the first group.
I won't explain why those groups are combined just yet.
i'm on mobile for the next few hours so I'll probably never give a satisfactory answer right now, but in short its to force more interactions and discussion on someone who so far has only aligned with James (and pointing that fact out) before you're here to give further inputIn post 422, StrangeMatter wrote:Okay, so what you found interesting was that the person I subbed into had several posts about James correct? Can you please explain to me what you would have gotten from this in specific detail?In post 419, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:what makes you think I haven't?In post 418, HockeyFan wrote:I forgot to mention this in the above post but @cows, why didnt u do this yourself? legit took like a 30 sec look at Rocky's ISO
im not asking people to do stuff for me, its been multiple days and I hope its established that I will call attention to things i find interesting
are you satisfied with the way it's been used in the thread, then? or no?In post 432, T3 wrote:TSTBS is usually okay-ish when the person in question is actively and deliberately doing things to draw attention.
i want to clarify that when making the post i was basically thinking 'T3 earlygame bad, midgame fine'. i think it's too early to start excusing certain actions because of others or even to start solidifying any sort of reads on T3In post 413, HockeyFan wrote:your tldr of that post was litreally "T3 looks bad earlygame but has lightened up with towny posts"
In post 428, GrandpaMo wrote:hm. so its more like this.
I am thinking about this pool:
[VFP, rockey, StrangeMatter]
I like this vote pool
or the other subgroup of
[Hockey, Cows, Bulge]
I think this one consists of 3 town tbh
I feel like those 3 of hockey, cows, bulge there is one PR, one scum, and one VT.
Why even say this?? u could have just said "i think 1 scum lies in here" not give PR ideas to mafia smh
And the other scum lies within the first group.
I won't explain why those groups are combined just yet.
can i get some posts that ping you? even if it's just gut
UNVOTE: HockeyFanIn post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
im mobile posting i don't know howIn post 440, JamesTheNames wrote:UNVOTE: HockeyFanIn post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
VOTE: cowsloveSushirolls
Worst excuse to vote someone of the month.In post 440, JamesTheNames wrote:UNVOTE: HockeyFanIn post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button
VOTE: cowsloveSushirolls
No. From what grandpa is saying hockey is actually doing scummy stuff, but not in a way to draw attention.In post 433, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:are you satisfied with the way it's been used in the thread, then? or no?In post 432, T3 wrote:TSTBS is usually okay-ish when the person in question is actively and deliberately doing things to draw attention.
James seriously, vc.In post 426, GrandpaMo wrote:t3 vc*
@VFP, u have an answer?
fair enoughIn post 447, VFP wrote:Everything in his ISO
You have yet to explain why my scumread on rocky is bad.In post 439, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:fwiw my biggest gripes with grandpa is their case on rocky which likely has the wackest logic used on this thread
but their conversations with hockey feel natural despite being based on a dumptruck of misinterpretations and they use conversations like these to build on reads that feel good
tonally, their ISO is a ton of highs and lows. my conclusion right now is that they probably shouldn't be condemned today and they have much, much more to offer
vote stays though cause lol i dont wanna go to the reply button