Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:30 am
I'm fine with making pools. But if the person I want to shoot isn't in the pool I'll probably say something about that.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
That's standard Titus.In post 390, NorwegianboyEE wrote:No i don’t want to elaborate on Bingle yet.In post 386, Fairy Circle wrote:Could you elaborate on Bingle and Titus? I haven't really felt strongly either way on Bingle, but I do quite like Titus thus far.
-Malefleacent
Titus, just really meh so far.
Also what do you make of them saying you need votes? They don’t seem to underline much of any of their votes so far with much reasoning.
Absolutely not.In post 392, Green Cap Boys wrote:So, anyway, my thoughts on the acceptable strategy for Pain potion usage is that we should have a vig pool of at most 2 names for people to shoot at.
This has the benefit of:
1. Concentrating town's firepower such that it's actually possible to flip a suspect. It doesn't matter if scum chooses to shoot there because it's on town, it's still a town-directed kill and is clearing out someone who otherwise would have been an elimination candidate.
2. It makes it scarier for scum to shoot in people outside the pool - in addition to the possibility of having a shot blocked by a doctor/jailkeeper potion, any result from a harmography potion is a hard guilty - they cannot get away with an excuse of "Oh I used my pain on [insert obvtown player here] because I scumread them"
If people want no vig shots at all, I think that's also an acceptable strategy, I just flat-out Do Not Want people shooting on a whim because that is likely to end badly and affords scum too much in the way of wiggle room
-R
I said it wasn't my strong point, and this isn't Ygg. The only similarity is HP and chip potential. Everyones got 2HP and we don't get updates beyond that.In post 395, Bingle wrote:Not only is this math completely wrong, it’s also completely irrelevant.In post 376, Fairy Circle wrote:Maths is not my strong suit. Neither is English apparently.
Mafia are aware of who to target, their pool is 8, I will not discuss scum tactics here.
Each one of us are only aware of ourselves. Our pool is 10.
2 people need to successfully target any one person to obtain a kill.
Town still has 1-in-10 (2:20) of hitting that kill in a single night. Over two nights it's a lot greater chance of hitting the kill and cannot be estimated without long calculations which frankly I do not have the time nor patience for.
I suspect there will be as much town invoked death as scum invoked. Greatest difficulty in this game is that NKA cannot feasibly happen.
-Malefleacent.
We need to either mass holster like we should have done in Ygg or turn the pain potions mechanic into additional eliminations, like we did after morph was confirmed.
And this is an absolutely waste of any power town has, and I know you're not stupid enough to suggest this legitmately.In post 398, Bingle wrote:These names should be leashed. First five can shoot at one, second five can shoot at the other. Additional benefit of mafia risking having to justify why they didn’t shoot.In post 392, Green Cap Boys wrote:2 names for people to shoot at.
In post 34, The Emperor wrote:Town post this far more often than scum think to fake itIn post 8, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Do mafia have a nightkill or do they just toss poison at people.
Towny for recognising that and calling it outIn post 10, Green Cap Boys wrote:I'm going to take this at face value and assume you're not the sort of person to fake this sort of thing. Unless you say you are.
Dwlee's giving me town pings for their weird posting that on a surface level looks scummy, and scum are less likely to make
The main things I like from Emp, along with his back and forth with ta vera which went over several posts and mostly boiled down to prompting her for actual content while she was catching up. I disagree that 8 was town indicative (Norwee is smart enough to ask non incriminating setup clarification questions publicly as scum) but the thought process that it would be town indicative isn't an unreasonable one. Further, the thought process of "I think thing X is town, Person Y thinks thing X is town, and I don't see a reason for Person Y to point out that thing X is town" is altogether far more towny than the generic "I think thing X is town and Person Y thinks thing X is town". It shows a level of paranoia as to GCB's motivations that I think is unlikely to be faked by scum as a throwaway read in the early days.In post 275, The Emperor wrote:So the meta read here is that scum Bingle doesn't really joke around about mech early game, while he almost always does as town from what I've seenIn post 134, The Emperor wrote:I have a meta read on Bingle which I'll hold onto for now
I don't really like the angle he's taking wrt to ta vera right now. 159 felt selective since it doesn't mention ta vera's mech analysis which I actually felt like it served some use, as well as her push on The Senate
It's not about killing the names we choose it's about potentially *conftowning* anyone who does shoot at those names.In post 426, Fairy Circle wrote:And this is an absolutely waste of any power town has, and I know you're not stupid enough to suggest this legitmately.
I mean... I'd hope you would. The point of leveraging the vigs into three eliminations would be to ACTUALLY HAVE THREE ELIMINATIONS. It wouldn't be hero shooting, it would be arguing scumreads in the main thread and presenting whys.In post 425, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm fine with making pools. But if the person I want to shoot isn't in the pool I'll probably say something about that.
Look at the playerlist.In post 426, Fairy Circle wrote:the human element to battle against.
You're going to have to wait for the full theory wall, but A. Yes we can. B. I'm not suggesting we dump all of our pain potions, but rather that we limit the available targets to two specific scummy players and then give each individual the choice of whether they shoot at said individual player (this time a specific one) or not. And C. Yes. It's entirely possible that people have more than one pot, but here's the important bit: A player, including scum can only use one pain pot per night. If they target the person they're allotted to target with a pain pot, they specifically can't have targeted anyone else. If a third player dies at night, we KNOW two scum targeted that player with pain pots and thus that at most one scum targeted the designated targets. Harmography potions have the potential to confirm that someone targeted their designated target. This leads to two options: scum not killing outside of a pool we control collectively, or scum risking large numbers of pseudoclears, backing 2/3 of their team into a small PoE pool, both of which are positive EV for town.In post 431, Fairy Circle wrote:That I can see in the limited information I have, we cannot even biasconf people here.
We have a limited supply of pain pots, and you're suggesting dumping them into 2 players. Thats what it reads as to me.
Not only that, we're dealing with random distribution of pain pots and it's entirely possible that there are people with no pots and multiple pots, as well as people holding more than 3 pots as you've already highlighted.
Agreed-ish. (JK pots might become more important later on.) But allowing the unleashed use of pain pots makes Harmography pots << useful. The way to weaken watchers is to add FVs.In post 436, Fairy Circle wrote:Harmography pots are our greatest tool here,
True. Why does that merit a townread?In post 426, Fairy Circle wrote:That's standard Titus.
Sure, but scum can also manipulate the elimination vote. That doesn't mean we forego voting for fear of scum influence.In post 436, Fairy Circle wrote:They're also savvy enough to attempt to manipulate the list to work in their favour if they're more evil than I.
One last note:In post 320, mastina wrote:Green Cap Boys
The Emperor
ta vera
NorwegianboyEE
{The Limit Does Not Exist, Dwlee99, Titus}
cass.bruant
Fairy Circle (hydra of Momrangal and Flea the Magician)
Bingle
Rough readslist. I realize it's not great but is all I've got.
Honestly, bias and a hint of gut. Like I said I'm going to talk to Momcinda and see where we stand between us.In post 439, Bingle wrote:True. Why does that merit a townread?In post 426, Fairy Circle wrote:That's standard Titus.
If town you was lurking, would scumtitus NOT push you for lurking? I'm seeing all of Titus' thread interaction as very par for the course for Titus, and also completely unparseable for alignment. Of course Titus pushes your slot for actively avoiding the thread, but she does that regardless of her alignment.
TIL, Norwee doesn't really love me. He just wants me to put out.In post 444, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hey i don't regret voting Bingle if it's gonna make him put out a lot of posts.
Wat?In post 447, Bingle wrote:TIL, Norwee doesn't really love me. He just wants me to put out.In post 444, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hey i don't regret voting Bingle if it's gonna make him put out a lot of posts.