Page 18 of 263

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:13 am
by Titus
In post 370, ArcAngel9 wrote:Not even hours into game its already 15 pages. would you guys slowdown for god sake!
Agreed. The volume makes it harder to read. I'll have to reread Sunday. Hard to get reads with divided attention.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:16 am
by Lukewarm
In post 421, Sleez wrote:
In post 412, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 402, Sleez wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm

Least comfortable vote on Medea, so much that even himself couldn't believe it. . Fraudulent behavior.
What does this mean?
You know what it means. This isn't a riddle for you to figure out, unless you're new usually your vote is meant to have purpose. Yet it didn't, and nothing you say to me feels like it comes from a process where you're concerned about reads.
I am trying to figure out what you mean by saying least comfortable. That you are least comfortable with my vote of all of the votes? Or that I am the person least comfortable voting them?

Also, not sure what you mean when you say that I don't believe it.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:19 am
by Sleez
I am almost certain you know what I'm saying and you think being befuddled could make people townread you.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:20 am
by Lukewarm
In post 423, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 420, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 419, Snarky Fishes wrote:asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.
Am I correct in my assumption that this is Bell answering a question that Ffery said she was purposefully not answering, and not ffery revealing this as the answer she left me waiting for? lol
you are not correct
Then I guess that was an underwhelming answer to wait for given that penguin basically said that that is what it was in .

The reason I leaned against that option was the soft agreeing with the read, as opposed to just asking him for more info

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:23 am
by Titus
In post 418, Medea the Alien wrote:Titus, ten pages in, you've seen the bulk of our wagon built, thoughts?
I find the lack of RVS odd. I'd expect some pushback regardless of your alignment. I'm glad we're not in RVS. I don't get why you have a wagon on you but reading for detail when playing DnD is hard.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:24 am
by Lukewarm
In post 427, Sleez wrote:I am almost certain you know what I'm saying and you think being befuddled could make people townread you.
I mean, I do have a guess. But I would rather you say it yourself in your own words, instead of me feeding your own opinion to you

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:25 am
by Sleez
I said exactly what I wanted to.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:26 am
by Lukewarm
nice

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:26 am
by Titus
In post 431, Sleez wrote:I said exactly what I wanted to.
This feels tonally town.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:30 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 428, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 423, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 420, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 419, Snarky Fishes wrote:asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.
Am I correct in my assumption that this is Bell answering a question that Ffery said she was purposefully not answering, and not ffery revealing this as the answer she left me waiting for? lol
you are not correct
Then I guess that was an underwhelming answer to wait for given that penguin basically said that that is what it was in .

The reason I leaned against that option was the soft agreeing with the read, as opposed to just asking him for more info
The wait wasn't so much for you. It was for them.

Cabd's was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.

You ruled the option out entirely in your binary choice. That's a little stronger than a lean against.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:35 am
by Annie Edison
In post 348, Annie Edison wrote:Yes.

I’m scumreading you but worried I’m just being cocky and it’s why I’m waiting for bulge, because in tenet when I was scumreading you and I’d show him posts when he was no longer really playing but he’d still agree with me. Like yes, ffery seeing it too helps some as well

Also because I cobra kai hammered both days of tarot without him and I want us to have an actual hydra game lol
Me two pages before AA9's question of my read on Medea.
In post 297, Annie Edison wrote:I liked Sleez’s abrasive ness and think it’s a weird look for scum in a setup with everyone so familiar with each other.

I’m still leaning town on LLD (don’t tell her I haven’t hit play on any of the videos either)

As I said before Pooky seems town and cephTD seems fine so far?

Is there a wagon you’d like to see as a counter to Medea?
Me on page 12.
In post 393, Annie Edison wrote:I find myself with varying degrees of townreads on the Medea wagon. And ffery. And manatee. And Dunn. And you.

I don’t think scum is all in (Medea, AA9, Titus, Spiffy)

Mind you not all of them are like take it to the bank reads. I’m just probably cutting too much slack ans trying to figure out where.
Me right before I express my distaste for AA9 not knowing my read on medea and the members of the wagon. It's literally most of what I've talked about this game.

@Titus, go on...

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:35 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:36 am
by Annie Edison
I want you to go on about your read on me and how it changed between those posts, for the record.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:36 am
by Annie Edison
(not cabd titus)

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:37 am
by Lukewarm
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 428, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 423, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 420, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 419, Snarky Fishes wrote:asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.
Am I correct in my assumption that this is Bell answering a question that Ffery said she was purposefully not answering, and not ffery revealing this as the answer she left me waiting for? lol
you are not correct
Then I guess that was an underwhelming answer to wait for given that penguin basically said that that is what it was in .

The reason I leaned against that option was the soft agreeing with the read, as opposed to just asking him for more info
The wait wasn't so much for you. It was for them.

Cabd's was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.

You ruled the option out entirely in your binary choice. That's a little stronger than a lean against.
If that is what they were after, then I still don't understand the way it was structured. My bianary was to explain why they approached Dunn the way they did, instead of just asking dunn to talk more about his read.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:46 am
by Titus
In post 435, Annie Edison wrote:@Titus, go on...
Go on?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:48 am
by Titus
In post 437, Annie Edison wrote:I want you to go on about your read on me and how it changed between those posts, for the record.
I was concerned you were hemming to avoid stances at first.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:49 am
by Annie Edison
I want a bit more about your read on me. I'm trying to read in that pool of four and see if that gamestate view makes any sense (basically had it down to Medea, you, AA9, spiffy) or if im cutting breaks somewhere i shouldnt

ninja-
ah

I feel like I was one of the earliest to actually explain some of their reads though? So thats kinda a weird take

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:51 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?
If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:51 am
by Titus
In post 442, Annie Edison wrote:ah

I feel like I was one of the earliest to actually explain some of their reads though? So thats kinda a weird take
Fair. You had words but I wasn't seeing stances. I also am struggling to see fine details.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:54 am
by Annie Edison
I'll try to type something up more finite after I finish dinner/while we watch LCS

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:56 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 443, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?
If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.
Pick the most useless one.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:58 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 446, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 443, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?
If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.
Pick the most useless one.
heh.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:06 pm
by Medea the Alien
In post 447, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 446, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 443, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?
If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.
Pick the most useless one.
heh.
You're running of time to have a good reason not to be old woman yells at clouds about our wagon~

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:14 pm
by Snarky Fishes
In post 448, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 447, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 446, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 443, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.
You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?
If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.
Pick the most useless one.
heh.
You're running of time to have a good reason not to be old woman yells at clouds about our wagon~
Peng was casting asparagus at me before and after dropping the crumb. why?