SlipIn post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.
(Just kidding)
SlipIn post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.
#1 I don't think is stellar play and is arguably +scum. I think the stated goal of getting the reads was most important to RegRider more than pressure for its own sake, and I think his persistence on the point reinforces this idea.In post 412, DaTacoX wrote:[On the RegRider vote]It's more than that for me.
1. Voted on Cheeky for "pressure" then unvoted immediately when she was barely close to being eliminated.
2. Suspicious of flow for looking into and questioning his earlier messages. (Never actually answered the question)
3. Only comments thus far are on messages directed towards himself and responding negatively to Cheeky's posts.
Because of the lack of content and the fact that I've interpreted a lot of it to be suspicious, I consider RegRider to be the safest vote today.
In post 276, RH9 wrote:To be fair, I like how while nobody exactly townreads me, nobody completely scumreads me either. The reasoning provided by MargotRosa has convinced me to VOTE: Prism.
You really need to explain what about them is persuasive to you. I asked you three times about what you found persuasive from Margot to no avail.In post 418, RH9 wrote:I think that the some of the reasons provided by DaTacoX, especially the one on pressuring CheekyTeeky, has prompted me to VOTE: RegRider.
In post 123, RH9 wrote:Anyways, should I just vote RegRider as my second random vote? I think I'll do it anyways until he says something about it.
VOTE: RegRider
Perhaps the inactivity vs. E-2 reasoning is a major difference, but I'd rather hear it from you.In post 124, RH9 wrote:Actually, UNVOTE: RegRider. I forgot that he said that he was going to be inactive until D2.
That's a little much for someone you just had as a neutral read?In post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.In post 418, RH9 wrote:I think that the some of the reasons provided by DaTacoX, especially the one on pressuring CheekyTeeky, has prompted me to VOTE: RegRider.
I think it's a legit slip.In post 425, flow trap wrote:SlipIn post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.
(Just kidding)
Hm? I thought it was an exaggerationIn post 434, CheekyTeeky wrote:I think it's a legit slip.In post 425, flow trap wrote:SlipIn post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.
(Just kidding)
Oh, interestingIn post 429, Prism wrote:That's a little much for someone you just had as a neutral read?
Oh right, forgot that you weren't supposed to say it here, used to ToS vocab so sorry about that. Don't really have any proper scum reads but out of everyone, thought flow was a bit weird for random pushing RegRider based off of the whole experience situation but Taco brought up some proper points of why they were voting Reg so the slight sus on them is null now. If I had to pick somebody it'd be Margot just because of them calling Prism scum for points that contradicted their previous statements about them. I'm very conflicted about RegRider right now though because of Taco's points on why they were voting them, but I have a gut feeling that they're townie.In post 429, Prism wrote:That's a little much for someone you just had as a neutral read?In post 424, Connordragon07 wrote:Panicked for a second cuz I thought y'all just mislynched while I was gone lol.In post 418, RH9 wrote:I think that the some of the reasons provided by DaTacoX, especially the one on pressuring CheekyTeeky, has prompted me to VOTE: RegRider.
I don't think you're voting atm-who are your top picks to vote out today? We do need to start getting a move on.
As a small note, try to avoid use of the word "lynch" here. We're trying to phase it out of the site vocabulary, but I understand it's deeply embedded.
I thought that due to the evidence provided, it made perfect sense to vote both you and RegRider. I promise that in the future to dig deeper before voting from the reasoning of others. I think that really, my townleans are still somewhat the same, however.In post 433, Prism wrote:I...really think you can dig deeper intowhythe reasoning struck a chord with you, even if it might take time to pinpoint it.
I don't tend to go off of other people's words unless I have none of my own because it's really easy to trick someone like you into voting someone else.In post 431, RH9 wrote:Ok, I'll UNVOTE: RegRider. The reason why I found DaTacoX convincing was the same reason why I found MargotRosa convincing. Their reasoning just seemed to make so much sense.
Alright, I'm convincedIn post 441, camelCasedSnivy wrote:I don't tend to go off of other people's words unless I have none of my own because it's really easy to trick someone like you into voting someone else.In post 431, RH9 wrote:Ok, I'll UNVOTE: RegRider. The reason why I found DaTacoX convincing was the same reason why I found MargotRosa convincing. Their reasoning just seemed to make so much sense.
For example, most players see me as town yet I can incriminate myself with the "when I get voted out" as a scummy line, as well as accusing Cheeky of bandwagoning even though it was only the third vote, suddenly changing my opinion on Cheeky's POE for no apparent reason and thinking too hard about certain things like a scumcase against DTX.
Probably would sound convincing to you.
The other vote they cast was what I imagine was an RVS on you at the top of the game. Easiest way to check is by clicking the big ISO letters next to a player's name on their posts in a game, and it will bring up every psot they've made in that game isolated, on one convenient pageIn post 446, RH9 wrote:Wait, what exactly did flow trap do, other then starting a bandwagon on RegRider, then voting Connordragon07, then after MargotRosa voted them, voted her? Did I miss anything? I'm worried that I missed something worse that they did. Wait, did flow trap vote CheekyTeeky, at one point?
In post 386, Prism wrote:I also am puzzled at that flow trap placement because that read on me from flow trap is deeply troubling from a meta perspective. Flow trap's last game with me they watched me control an entire game start to finish as scum, and turn myself into a UTR the second I felt like being one.
There's being eager to try again but townreading me with this little content is really out there.