Mafiascum.net

Nyeh!

i think i'm still at the same place got 4 i like still looking for a 5th.

In post 406, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:If Pavowski and Cyrus can agree on a 5 that does not include Nathann I'll sheep it

I've been noodling on this all day, and I just don't think scum goes so hard against a single slot, especially one that's, if not being scum read, has had a hard time getting traction in the coalition.

I'm not saying Kyo is right, I just don't see why scum would tunnel like that here.

i realy like nathann . i cant real find other towns i have some scum thoughts on who i think could be scum but i wasn't really bothering scum hunting i was town hunting. damn it dont make me scum hunt to. lol joking. i think encant and yessir are scum and we cant go wrong if we dont vote them.

i neverd promised town casing nathann. i have never town cased and i seldom scum case any way. i go by gut to. if they feel like scum . act like scum and talk like scum. they must be is the way i play. plus i just say random things.

pav if you want ssbm in your five but like i said if she gets in the 5 and we fail im death tunneling her.

and before you all start hurting me remember i never wanted in.

In post 429, cyrus62 wrote:plus i just say random things.

In post 430, cyrus62 wrote:pav if you want ssbm in your five but like i said if she gets in the 5 and we fail im death tunneling her.

I don't really, but I do need to replace yessirree with somebody.

In post 433, Pavowski wrote:

In post 430, cyrus62 wrote:pav if you want ssbm in your five but like i said if she gets in the 5 and we fail im death tunneling her.

I don't really, but I do need to replace yessirree with somebody.

convince me to unvote nathann.
case why he isnt good to vote.

Not prepared to make that case.

In post 435, Pavowski wrote:Not prepared to make that case.

then vote him then i think we match at least.

call me sketchy but save the dragon fooled me hard in our game pav. you know whe he beat us. is he kinda acting the same?

In post 437, cyrus62 wrote:call me sketchy but save the dragon fooled me hard in our game pav. you know whe he beat us. is he kinda acting the same?

Kinda, but he also sounds very like the way he sounded in a game I just finished with him. He was town. See my earlier post, he's got some interactions with me in this thread that don't feel faked.

What if there is two scum in my five?

In post 416, Pavowski wrote: It's not the thickest case, and I admit I have some difficulty reading STD, but tonally I'm finding him relaxed and involved in a way that I don't really expect from scum!std.

He's also had a few genuine-feeling reactions to blips in the thread, esp regarding his reads on me, that I don't think scum would have.

How's his usual confidence level compared to normal D1? I see a lot of "i think", "i guess" - that sort of thing. For some players, that's a sign of Town - for others, scum.

HEAL: Cyrus
HEAL: Pav

For now. Having doubts about Kyuoko recently.

In post 439, cyrus62 wrote:What if there is two scum in my five?

This to me is a silly thing to worry about.

Basically everybody should be doing 3 things imo:

1 name to the coalition the players they find most likely to flip green
2 coordinate their coalition list with those of other players to try to lurch toward an agreement
3 be keeping tabs on who may be scum in case the coalition fails

In post 440, Farren wrote:

In post 416, Pavowski wrote: It's not the thickest case, and I admit I have some difficulty reading STD, but tonally I'm finding him relaxed and involved in a way that I don't really expect from scum!std.

He's also had a few genuine-feeling reactions to blips in the thread, esp regarding his reads on me, that I don't think scum would have.

How's his usual confidence level compared to normal D1? I see a lot of "i think", "i guess" - that sort of thing. For some players, that's a sign of Town - for others, scum.

Hard to say, I replaced in to my last game with him. Again, more of my TR on STD is coming from a few genuine-feeling interactions in this thread, rather than his tone (which feels pretty consistent across games, if a little more relaxed here).

Also I am getting whiffs of scummy "better make sure I post something" vibes from this. I compare farren earlier in the thread with farren here. This is the only substantive post in 24 hours, and calling it substantive is a stretch.

Do not like.

So we're playing the "waiting for a replacement" game, huh.

Kyouko, you're missing the main things I actually want you to address. Why are you so certain that one post is always coming from Scum, so much so that you're ignoring everything else I'm saying? Do you have an opinion on anything else I've said? And if apparently that read isn't connected to the game we just played in, I'm even more confused because surely if you're that certain of someone's alignment based off a tonal read from one post, you'd go check that read based on meta you have available to you?

Also, you seemed much more interested in actually playing there. I know one game of experience isn't a good sample size for meta, but here you seem very lazy and nonexistent, and the difference is kinda jarring.

I'm just waiting for the coalition to settle in at this point. If we dont win, I'll give the thread a reread once I have info on which group of 5 is guaranteed to have scum. I'll continue to argue against you being in it and maybe try to get myself in but I think that ship has sailed. Maybe the replacement will reenergize me, but that's not what I'm waiting on.

If you q+ questions I missed I can address them as well, just spoiler them and @me

In post 445, Nathann wrote:Kyouko, you're missing the main things I actually want you to address. Why are you so certain that one post is always coming from Scum, so much so that you're ignoring everything else I'm saying? Do you have an opinion on anything else I've said? And if apparently that read isn't connected to the game we just played in, I'm even more confused because surely if you're that certain of someone's alignment based off a tonal read from one post, you'd go check that read based on meta you have available to you?

It's literally right here.

In post 427, Pavowski wrote:

In post 406, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:If Pavowski and Cyrus can agree on a 5 that does not include Nathann I'll sheep it

I've been noodling on this all day, and I just don't think scum goes so hard against a single slot, especially one that's, if not being scum read, has had a hard time getting traction in the coalition.

I'm not saying Kyo is right, I just don't see why scum would tunnel like that here.

Isn't this an older Scum tactic? Tunnel a single Town slot to appear busy, save yourself from actually having to do fake analysis of other people and whatnot. If she is Scum here, I'd guess that means her partner is already on their way to be in the Coalition, and she's setting up a later Day plan to get me yeeted after we find her partner in the Coalition... But that's too far into speculation.

Pavowski, do you need anything from me to help you read me better? Like, I'm reading your hesitancy, and I really don't get it.