Page 18 of 93
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:17 pm
by House
In post 423, fua wrote:If we don’t believe the claim, then let the real vigilante shoot redtea at night. If redtea is still alive, that means that they’re a confirmed townie or we just found two scum covering for each other.
Or... and I'm just spitballing here... there may be no vig...
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:18 pm
by fua
My gut says that Cool Cookie and redtea are both town, though. Dunno why two scum would out themselves immediately.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:18 pm
by House
In post 426, fua wrote:My gut says that Cool Cookie and redtea are both town, though. Dunno why two scum would out themselves immediately.
Cookie is, for sure.
redtea didn't have much choice
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:19 pm
by fua
In post 425, House wrote: In post 423, fua wrote:If we don’t believe the claim, then let the real vigilante shoot redtea at night. If redtea is still alive, that means that they’re a confirmed townie or we just found two scum covering for each other.
Or... and I'm just spitballing here... there may be no vig...
If there’s no vigilante, why would the traitor be bulletproof? Wouldn’t that mean cool cookie and redtea are both lying about the claim?
Unless you’re saying that it’s so mafia can’t actually kill the traitor, in which case what you’re saying is possible. I still don’t think Three’s posts are from someone who’s town-aligned.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:20 pm
by Three
Fua, do you really believe I'm the only player in this game who insisted we shoot redtea?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:22 pm
by fua
In post 429, Three wrote:Fua, do you really believe I'm the only player in this game who insisted we shoot redtea?
Following the claim? You’ve definitely been the most insistent on it.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:23 pm
by Three
In post 430, fua wrote: In post 429, Three wrote:Fua, do you really believe I'm the only player in this game who insisted we shoot redtea?
Following the claim? You’ve definitely been the most insistent on it.
Show me.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:24 pm
by House
In post 428, fua wrote: In post 425, House wrote: In post 423, fua wrote:If we don’t believe the claim, then let the real vigilante shoot redtea at night. If redtea is still alive, that means that they’re a confirmed townie or we just found two scum covering for each other.
Or... and I'm just spitballing here... there may be no vig...
If there’s no vigilante, why would the traitor be bulletproof? Wouldn’t that mean cool cookie and redtea are both lying about the claim?
Unless you’re saying that it’s so mafia can’t actually kill the traitor, in which case what you’re saying is possible.
Now we're on the same page.
I'm not fussed about the vig claim. redtea never sees elo after coming out with that.
I just hope we get utility out of it before they die, if it's real.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:25 pm
by fua
In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:26 pm
by House
In post 433, fua wrote: In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Because he agreed not to shoot if we mislim.
If there are 2 kills tonight after a mislim, he's outed.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:27 pm
by fua
I think that post comes off as really insistent on ending the day early and voting out someone who claimed a PR before they have the chance to actually prove themselves. Beyond that you’ve really just been posting one-liners and arguing semantics with House.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:27 pm
by Three
In post 433, fua wrote: In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Questioning why a slot isn't dead =/= I want the slot.
But I'm sure you know you're reaching here.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:28 pm
by fua
In post 436, Three wrote: In post 433, fua wrote: In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Questioning why a slot isn't dead =/= I want the slot.
Yes it does.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:28 pm
by House
In post 436, Three wrote: In post 433, fua wrote: In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Questioning why a slot isn't dead =/= I want the slot.
But I'm sure you know you're reaching here.
It does ON DAY ONE.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:29 pm
by House
VOTE: Three
This seems like a good push.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:31 pm
by Three
In post 435, fua wrote:I think that post comes off as really insistent on ending the day early and voting out someone who claimed a PR before they have the chance to actually prove themselves. Beyond that you’ve really just been posting one-liners and arguing semantics with House.
One-liners are NAI.
I didn't argue semantics and in fact cut our conversation short when I saw it wasn't going anywhere.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:39 pm
by Three
Unfortunately for you, you're wrong.
Still tilted?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:41 pm
by redtea
In post 436, Three wrote: In post 433, fua wrote: In post 388, Three wrote: In post 386, House wrote:
That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
This is where I'm at.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
Questioning why a slot isn't dead =/= I want the slot.
But I'm sure you know you're reaching here.
I was about to jump on on this, but isn't this more questioning the setup than pushing for me?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:41 pm
by redtea
"if peoppe genuinely believe" is what struck me
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:44 pm
by fua
In post 429, Three wrote:Fua, do you really believe I'm the only player in this game who insisted we shoot redtea?
I feel like Three’s own claim that he didn’t want redtea to die is a walkback from this post after I said that he was the one pushing for redtea to die the most.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:47 pm
by redtea
in fact, that post i just quoted was made after three switched his vote from me to t3
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:49 pm
by redtea
fua, I don't think you thought this through
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:51 pm
by Three
Exactly. I'm the one who suggested this was a zero Goon game in the first place.
Fua and House claiming that I want you dead after my set up speculation suggested how important you are just feels like mental gymnastics at this point.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:59 pm
by Three
In post 444, fua wrote: In post 429, Three wrote:Fua, do you really believe I'm the only player in this game who insisted we shoot redtea?
I feel like Three’s own claim that he didn’t want redtea to die is a walkback from this post after I said that he was the one pushing for redtea to die the most.
I didn't walk back anything. I voted redtea then moved my vote. You seem to be under the impression I can place six votes on someone though.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 5:00 pm
by redtea
Yeah, cookie was kind of skeptical and jacket doesnt like me, but thats about it