Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2021 1:08 pm
Aaaand pagetopped, yeet
I'm satisfied that I understand where your suspicions are coming from now, but I promise you will see that townfire once I have reads I feel it's worth bringing the heat forIn post 391, Bingle wrote:Where is the GL townfire? Where is the grabbing the thread by the horns? Where is the three page analysis of whether Bingle actually says he hammer his partner for the loss that you freak out about two pages later and completely drop?
is "preliminary push looking to gauge reactions" what you meant by "shitpush"? I thought it meant more along the lines of pushing someone for bad or easily refutable reasons. I don't think I subscribe to this dichotomy in this question - I want more reads/participation from everybody and to feel better about my overall reads and limpool before championing a lim on anyone, but I do think my points against Roden and his defensive responses were valid for early game pressure and I have not yet felt town vibes from anything he's posted.In post 391, Bingle wrote:Y/N this is an angle of investigation you actively believe results in a roden lim and not a preliminary push looking to gauge reactions.
This is actually hard, the game's not deep enough for me to feel good about any of my reads yet. I'll try though. I had some last night but I want to reevaluate if the monkey king isn't gonna let me changeIn post 393, Almost50 wrote:First "Dictatorian" Declaration:
I; King of thread and ruler of both Town & Mafia alike; have decided in all my mighty grace to request order all of my subjects and minions to each provide a 3-players list of their top TRs (NOT including self).
DArbyIn post 393, Almost50 wrote:I; King of thread and ruler of both Town & Mafia alike; have decided in all my mighty grace to request order all of my subjects and minions to each provide a 3-players list of their top TRs (NOT including self).
you're just trying to save yourself.In post 417, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 393, Almost50 wrote:I feel bored, so I may decide to actually play this game seriously. (Sorry for those this may disappoint)
OK..
First "Dictatorian" Declaration:
I; King of thread and ruler of both Town & Mafia alike; have decided in all my mighty grace torequestorder all of my subjects and minions to each provide a 3-players list of their top TRs (NOT including self).
- You have 24 hours to comply.
- Once submitted you cannot alter your choices.
In no particular order:
Pav
Bingle/LQ
GL
Tired af irl, kind of lost in this game.
By inspiring fromLQ's point:
UNVOTE: Enchant
VOTE: Roden
Walk me through your Galron read, I can't see it? Like sure, some of his questions are "pro-town", but what makes them likelier to come from town!Galron?In post 429, GuiltyLion wrote:^ these three feel the most pure / agendaless to me
Similar question to Esther: do you believe that scum!GL wouldn't have posted pro-town content as he did so far?In post 322, mc esther wrote:guiltylion seems by far the most obviously pro-town player, both for his early-game contributions and for his more recent attempt at understanding the thread.
Did anyone else see this and sort of chuckle to themselves?In post 426, Not_Mafia wrote:instantly eliminate.
early game, fair question. to some extent, i cant know, and that's what makes online mafia so difficult. it'd be a very weak towntell if it stopped there.In post 433, Auro wrote:Similar question to Esther: do you believe that scum!GL wouldn't have posted pro-town content as he did so far?
posts like this are the ones that have me going "scum dont have to do this and im really not sure they want to". the evidence in-thread is that nobody wants to make these posts! it pings town over scum to me because i think it disproportionately benefits scum to leave those pages as much a black hole as possible. clarifying the general thrust of the argument and giving interpretations seems to be hurt the mafia's, idk, "abstract wincon" (a low-information gamestate) way beyond any towncred it might be worth; it would cost literally nothing to just, refuse to make any attempt.In post 290, GuiltyLion wrote:my one main salient takeaway from the LQ/Roden bit is that both are making dubious claims on one particular front
Roden in 205 asks LQ if LQ thinks Roden "purposefully puts himself in this situation as scum". Again I think Roden is questionably taking credit for something that I feel I'm responsible for (early wagon/pressure on Roden). The logic of "why would I get wagoned as scum" isn't easy to understand from either a town/scum perspective, it's not clear what Roden specifically thinks that he did to get himself wagoned and whether that was intentional. However I have seen both alignments make the "I wouldn't be wagoned if I were scum here" claim, it's not something I feel comfortable reasoning about as AI but I certainly don't townread it, at best it's WIFOMy.
However, Roden has a point in 209 that LQ agreeing that scum!Roden might indeed intentionally "put himself in this situation" is also a bad take. Scum do not love early scrutiny, in almost any circumstance. I don't see LQ's logic in implying that this COULD be a scum plan - again, how and where did Roden even intentionally invite pressure on himself? Whatever Roden's alignment is, I'm sure he'd rather not be voted and rather not have to argue with people voting him.
I can see what LQ is saying in that LQ just kinda went along with an idea (being intentionally wagoned) that Roden put out there, but it's just such bad reasoning on both sides ("if I were scum, I wouldn't be wagoned") ("no, if you were scum, this might be your plan!!") that I'm having a hard time parsing why either player is taking any of the logic seriously.
This is me trying (and how dare you make me effort on d1, monkey man)In post 428, Pavowski wrote:This is actually hard, the game's not deep enough for me to feel good about any of my reads yet. I'll try though. I had some last night but I want to reevaluate if the monkey king isn't gonna let me changeIn post 393, Almost50 wrote:First "Dictatorian" Declaration:
I; King of thread and ruler of both Town & Mafia alike; have decided in all my mighty grace to request order all of my subjects and minions to each provide a 3-players list of their top TRs (NOT including self).
Also also, I can't put my finger on why but I just can't see this post coming from scum.In post 438, mc esther wrote:roden's up on 48 hours btw. if it takes another two 48-hour prods to have him replaced, we won't have anyone in that slot until three days before deadline. i dont really know what to make of this information, just drawing it to the attention of someone with stronger opinions on deadline management than me.
In post 430, T3 wrote: i'll be honest i haven't even noticed that roden was being cased
In post 411, LicketyQuickety wrote: But at this point my SR on Roden grew stronger when they ditched the thread which I am reading as them doing so so that the votes start to fall off them.
In post 440, Pavowski wrote: A NK'd GL would be another story.