Mafiascum.net

In post 411, jjh927 wrote:That d3 pawn is the weaker move

I hope whoever made it was put off by me saying nc3 was the best way to protect that pawn and just didn't want to copy me

Sure, they can develop their dark square bishop now and in fact without doing so already control a reasonable diagonal, but they've passed up on developing their knight with tempo and they don't gain any more centre control from this.

In post 354, jjh927 wrote:Just so we're clear on what I want here T3, what you did there was define the buzzword rather than identify any underlying reason for why you think it is scum aligned behaviour, through which you continue to display a simplistic outlook that is easily faked by scum as you are not actually looking for scum but rather things that people commonly agree (regardless of their accuracy) are considered "scummy".

In post 198, Dwlee99 wrote:Rogue
T3
Lady Lambdadelta
That Idiot Ivan
skitter30
Shiro

I may have solved the game as well

In post 428, jjh927 wrote:Basically no, you are not getting off by saying "that's fairly obvious" when I am trying to see whether you are thinking at all beyond seeing something you can justifiably call scummy which I don't think has any real foundation behind it

In post 429, skitter30 wrote:

In post 198, Dwlee99 wrote:Rogue
T3
Lady Lambdadelta
That Idiot Ivan
skitter30
Shiro

I may have solved the game as well

I'm gonna be honest when i originally saw this i thought it was so ???? as to be an rvs-stage meme / had that level of seriousness

The fact that you're sticking by it tho is kinda ??? for me because like half of thise names i had townpings on at that point, and i'm not really sure what you're seeing to exclude the rest

In post 415, Rogue wrote:Like, when I’m reading this post I hear “Back off this push and I’ll back off”

In post 433, Dwlee99 wrote:@pooky can I get your read on me. It sounded like you wanted to hammer me

In post 431, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 429, skitter30 wrote:

In post 198, Dwlee99 wrote:Rogue
T3
Lady Lambdadelta
That Idiot Ivan
skitter30
Shiro

I may have solved the game as well

I'm gonna be honest when i originally saw this i thought it was so ???? as to be an rvs-stage meme / had that level of seriousness

The fact that you're sticking by it tho is kinda ??? for me because like half of thise names i had townpings on at that point, and i'm not really sure what you're seeing to exclude the rest

It's super early but some good guesses I think. I went through why I excluded each person I did in 399 if you want to respond to that. I will also point out that half that list has to be town, so if you think half is town I could still be dead on accurate (which is unlikely, but still)

In post 434, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 415, Rogue wrote:Like, when I’m reading this post I hear “Back off this push and I’ll back off”

Oh I wanted to respond to this.

Yes, that's what I'm saying. LLD and I have done this and I feel like it completely derails everything and just isn't healthy. I'm glad she is giving me more space to do things other than respond to her cause I need(ed) that

In post 439, skitter30 wrote:I want to say that besides for the times i cant tell what they're drawing, pookydra is doing a p decent job communicating

Possible to indicate somehow who's talking tho?

Also i dont really have a problem with jjh, saw a few people getting ponged by him

In post 438, skitter30 wrote:Ok i guess a few thoughts on this:
- you're acting like you presently think you're wrong on me (i.e. you're acting like you're townreading me now)
- the second sentence is silly, of course at least half of any 6 names is gonna be town (assiming 3 scum etc), so of course you can still be right technically but that isnt like a massive accomplishment or anything ...
- is this still your poe presently? I saw u would take me out and add poodydra but anything else?

In post 440, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 434, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 415, Rogue wrote:Like, when I’m reading this post I hear “Back off this push and I’ll back off”

Oh I wanted to respond to this.

Yes, that's what I'm saying. LLD and I have done this and I feel like it completely derails everything and just isn't healthy. I'm glad she is giving me more space to do things other than respond to her cause I need(ed) that

To be clear I am giving you rope to hang yourself with, and enough space for others to read the interaction.

I have not seen anything that has made me not want to kill you.

In post 444, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 440, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 434, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 415, Rogue wrote:Like, when I’m reading this post I hear “Back off this push and I’ll back off”

Oh I wanted to respond to this.

Yes, that's what I'm saying. LLD and I have done this and I feel like it completely derails everything and just isn't healthy. I'm glad she is giving me more space to do things other than respond to her cause I need(ed) that

To be clear I am giving you rope to hang yourself with, and enough space for others to read the interaction.

I have not seen anything that has made me not want to kill you.

I will say that this is slightly town indicative as well from LLD because tbh I'd expect her to know that I'm gonna flail and be scummier if she just like, posts accusations at me in relation to my more recent posts, than if I'm left to my own devices to solve here and can explain my thoughts.