Mafiascum.net

In post 263, Alianna wrote:

In post 261, froggodoggo wrote:What are our thoughts on claiming this game? I don’t see any particular claim that would make me want to unvote someone, even a N1 cop since if I think they are scum then I can’t trust the check anyways. Should we skip the whole claim after intent thing? I’m not super experienced in this regard so would like to hear opinions on this!!

I think claiming after intent is a good thing. If we wagon a cop with a result, we want to know what that result is before we flip them. Otherwise, claims don't mean much.
If we're talking massclaim, the major upside is that maf are basically locked into their claims and can't get away with as many shenanigans. The downside is that they'd be able to strategize around knowing what everyone is.

In post 424, Fun Times wrote:yeah, like it hit e-1 then started dissolving, I'd also just be down to yeet NM and call it a day... maybe. I haven't seen Alliana here since I started calling her maf, frozen scum?
-Andante

In post 428, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 424, Fun Times wrote:yeah, like it hit e-1 then started dissolving, I'd also just be down to yeet NM and call it a day... maybe. I haven't seen Alliana here since I started calling her maf, frozen scum?
-Andante

Didn’t you call her scum just some hours ago? And you say the could be frozen scum?

In post 429, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 428, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 424, Fun Times wrote:yeah, like it hit e-1 then started dissolving, I'd also just be down to yeet NM and call it a day... maybe. I haven't seen Alliana here since I started calling her maf, frozen scum?
-Andante

Didn’t you call her scum just some hours ago? And you say the could be frozen scum?

She called me frozen scum after 45 seconds so...seems she wants a very rapid response.

In post 429, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 428, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 424, Fun Times wrote:yeah, like it hit e-1 then started dissolving, I'd also just be down to yeet NM and call it a day... maybe. I haven't seen Alliana here since I started calling her maf, frozen scum?
-Andante

Didn’t you call her scum just some hours ago? And you say the could be frozen scum?

She called me frozen scum after 45 seconds so...seems she wants a very rapid response.

In post 413, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 411, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 350, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’d also like to know if you still scumread them BBT.

Weird vibe from this post.

Why is that a weird vibe.
I wanted to doubly make sure BBT responded cus i wanted to know that too.

In post 365, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 311, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like a page 1 elim doesn’t really net good wagon data

i'm sorry - did you actually think i was serious?

In post 386, Fun Times wrote:VOTE: Penguin

gg gottem. frozen scum

-Andante

In post 396, PenguinPower wrote:we had nice competing wagons in me and Alianna at that point...booo

In post 416, Fun Times wrote:

In post 414, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 412, Fun Times wrote:

In post 387, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 384, Fun Times wrote:

In post 382, PenguinPower wrote:Wow....two lolhammers not interested in lolhammering...

this is a wacky world.

in this wacky world, are you a wolf?

-Andante

No - I carry a gun and shoot people at night.

IDK HOW I MISSED THIS!!!

oof, Penguin... you don't sound like a good guy ._. you sound... S C A R Y

-Andante

depends on your perspective really

well if I was on the dark side, you'd be my bestie right now, but from the perspective of having TOWN's best interest in mind... I think we're playing for opposite teams here...

In post 437, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I would like Alianna to come back and respond in thread before proceeding to yeet her.

In post 438, Fun Times wrote:ok, not to dumbtell or whatever, but I thought we could only have cops/docs and this is the 2nd time I'm seeing someone talk to me about a vig. there's literally no vig in the setup??

-Andante

In post 436, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 416, Fun Times wrote:

In post 414, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 412, Fun Times wrote:

In post 387, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 384, Fun Times wrote:

In post 382, PenguinPower wrote:Wow....two lolhammers not interested in lolhammering...

this is a wacky world.

in this wacky world, are you a wolf?

-Andante

No - I carry a gun and shoot people at night.

IDK HOW I MISSED THIS!!!

oof, Penguin... you don't sound like a good guy ._. you sound... S C A R Y

-Andante

depends on your perspective really

well if I was on the dark side, you'd be my bestie right now, but from the perspective of having TOWN's best interest in mind... I think we're playing for opposite teams here...

Your mindset is exclusionary to vigilantes

In post 443, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Only fair she gets a chance to respond to the wagon, no?

I would think a stranger process is just to yeet her while she isn't here

In post 446, Fun Times wrote:no one is doing anything

In post 293, Fun Times wrote:ok, well, I think Sommus is town, I'm pretty certain Alianna is scum, that ISO is atrocious. like, you start the game off claiming VT - cause you think you're being funny? and then you acknowldge you see a claim but "I don't know what to think of it" then right after BlueBlooded votes Enchant, you vote enchant... and only after no one else joins, you back off. like, why is your reaction to a claim "idk what I think of the claim. OH I MUST VOTE IT!!!" then later claim "lol I was RVS testing Enchant" since when do we ever RVS test pr claims?? like.. idk, nothing about that ISO looks good, looks like others are SRing Alianna, so hey, maybe I'm right!

Nancy can have our vote though, I'm just here to let people know what I think.

-Andante