well for one thing I don't think either you or unwnd have failed to interact with people
I remarked that it's interesting that unwnd hasn't explained very developed reads on anyone else, which I think is entirely different.
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:48 am
by Dannflor
I think you're making this read on me up.
That wasn't really the basis of my read on you/greeting either. You've definitely made an effort to interact with almost everyone in the game. unwnd has done a lot with ydrasse/junko/una/myself too.
it's more about who are people explicitly trying to distance with and who looks the most awkward doing that
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:50 am
by Dannflor
if you're trying to argue that I should be thinking "oh scum wouldn't want to look that awkward distancing with each other"
I mean yeah okay that might be valid
and I don't even feel that strongly about a lucian/unwnd world. I just am considering that it's possible that unwnd, in wanting to create believable distance early, put more effort into creating a very believable and in depth read on you, then he did in explaining his reads on everyone else
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:54 am
by Lucian
Yeah, this wasn't as informative as I'd hoped it would be. Maybe slightly leaning +town on this because your reasoning is a bit more nuanced than I first thought?
In post 394, Ydrasse wrote:unwnd is an unreadable obelisk. i think he’s town this game (?)
Can you explain this a bit more? Last time it was something about vibes
i reread this morning and then sat back and thoigh about fortress where i feel like all you did that game of a lot of it was equivalent to emotional bludgeoning and being a pain but i think you’re more inquisitive and invested in your solving
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:06 am
by Lucian
In post 396, Ydrasse wrote:having had weird vibes around lucian and then ending up advocating for what is in essence the same coalition is giving alarm bells
What does this actually mean?
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:06 am
by unwnd
Serious question--
Are the words I'm using like, not easy to follow? I write things because I want to convince people. I want them to see what I'm seeing
In post 396, Ydrasse wrote:having had weird vibes around lucian and then ending up advocating for what is in essence the same coalition is giving alarm bells
What does this actually mean?
it means there’s an error of how i’m perceiving the game if someone who i was feeling weirdly about is advocating for the same solution as me
if my weird feelings = thinking you’re wolfy, and we want the same solve, that means i’m probably advocating for a solve at that moment with a wolf in it
if i resolve them as you being ultimately towny that means i’m going to want you in the coalition and raises the odds a bit that a wolf could be in my solve bcuz one town is not in it
In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
this is a contradiction you know?
you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.
HURT: Vanderscamp
Mena and I are different players.
I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.
In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
this is a contradiction you know?
you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.
HURT: Vanderscamp
Mena and I are different players.
I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.
I mean, I love playing scum, town is like meh, unless the lobby is fun and dandy
Does Mena love playing scum?
vanderscamp you rolled scum with Menalque in micro 999 last year, a game in which he top posted and end gamed
so why is this your opinion of menalque's scum game
also, I do not understand why you asked whether menalque loves playing scum when it's clear you have some meta with menalque and also have already formed your own opinion on his alignment preference?