Page 171 of 256

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:43 pm
by chkflip
Idc about this game rn. Bit sick.

I'll come back critical D4.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 1:36 pm
by a2rudeboy
In post 4248, chkflip wrote:Goofball, please shoot someone in the hundred-and-something or less posts category. Lurkfucks bother me.
Chk- Any reason for the switch in thought?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 1:39 pm
by a2rudeboy
Just a friendly reminder Lav has less posts than the D1 shred, N1 kill and D2 shred. And we are near deadline on D3

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 1:47 pm
by chkflip
I've already covered it if I'm not mistaken?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:08 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
Letting rude get his way is a bad idea. Policy lynching is a bad idea.. lynching dgb or TD or Drew is a better idea.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:12 pm
by Grendel
Icerint if you have a confirmable town role you should really go ahead and claim. Otherwise you're causing an unnecessary waiting game that will make EoD less effective in catching scum. Town needs enough time to access the claim, and time to consider if pivoting is needed.

Even if its not a non-confirmable town aligned role this is still not a good situation to sit on it.

-/-/--

Hi Chk, I know you're going to say something snappy about how bad it is to push for a claim w/o intent. I think that notion is just not really correct when we're reaching EoD and like the past few pages have done very little in the way of new and meaningful content. It just looks like most players are waiting around for EoD to happen to them. Whats to point of dragging events out like this? There is no point imo. :/

Even you yourself said you aren't going to be engaged again until D4 comes.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:26 pm
by Grendel
In post 4225, Almost50 wrote:
In post 4218, DrippingGoofball wrote:A50 you're not voting. Be a pal. We need Iecerint's fake claim. We are running out of time.
Do you want my
HONEST
opinion? We are ALL scum in this game (and that includes me). Some of us aren't reading anymore *raises hand* and some are hopping on each and every wagon that remotely looks like taking off, making it damn too hard to draw any associative tells either way. Regardless of who gets shredded; I feel like anyone ON the wagon could be scum (bussing or pushing a miselim, depending on the flip), and anyone OFF it could still be scum (avoiding a p's wagon or distancing from a miselim). It is sad that that's how it feels on D3, but seriously.. I fon't know why wagons form or dissipate in this game anymore, and everyone's shouting a different set of names to be shredded.
I think that this can be savlagable working backwards with TRs. Figure out who your trusts are and bloc with them.

anycase I can say im pretty disappointed reading through your iso. I recall you being a much more apt player back in 2016. You dont seem like you've been trying v hard despite the sheer volume of your posts this game. Perhaps I confused you with another player? idk :(

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:31 pm
by Grendel
In post 4254, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Letting rude get his way is a bad idea. Policy lynching is a bad idea.. lynching dgb or TD or Drew is a better idea.
I've been thinking. It doesn't really make since for TD, and DGB, to be scum togather.

Thier hard mutual town read is a really brazen play for scum to make in the situation they were in.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:34 pm
by Grendel
In post 4252, a2rudeboy wrote:Just a friendly reminder Lav has less posts than the D1 shred, N1 kill and D2 shred. And we are near deadline on D3
I'm happy to support a Lavender flip if you get the support.

What did you say your Tipaindeath read was agian?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:35 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
are we really flipping people for lurking now

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:45 pm
by Grendel
In post 4174, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lavender and ice
Can you remind me why you think Ice is low hanging fruit?

-/-/-/-/-
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are we really flipping people for lurking now
you see town motivations in lavender? Where

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:46 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
you see scum motivations in lavender?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:54 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
like she lurks every game she plays. if you want her to say something - just ask her and she will probly get back to you in a day or two.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:59 pm
by a2rudeboy
If the idea is that Lurk-Lav is going to get lynched -at some point- (ie from Chk's: She won't make it to end of the game, don't worry") When is the ideal time to get rid?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:00 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
there are ways to solve lurker slot alignments that don't involve wasting a flip on them

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:04 pm
by Grendel
Sure, I think that the extent of pressure required to get anything useful out of her content wise is pretty scummy. As well as the lack of interest in her wagon is odd despite there being several people that had her in thier PoE most the game. I looked through the VCs to confirm this and the largest wagon on Lavender was D2 with 5 voters mid day, outside of that she would have 1 or 2 votes at a time, or no votes whatsoever.

THere may have been a another wagon that was off the VCs with more then a couple voters but i dont recall where that was.

The slanking itself is not super AI, I care less about that. It more how she interacts with the thread itself looks scummy, and how she mostly flies under the radar.

pre-edit

Shes really like this every game? :/

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:05 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
On my read through of lavender her scum posts were less substantial if I remember.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:14 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
ok you don't need to apply pressure to lavender to get things out of her.

you just have to ask her nicely.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:14 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
ok you don't need to apply pressure to lavender to get things out of her.

you just have to ask her nicely.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:16 pm
by Doctor Drew
In post 4259, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are we really flipping people for lurking now
I am disappointed in you, thought you were ride or die with me to shred NPOM.

Obviously if any shred is going to happen besides Ice(leaning this way now tbh) I would highly prefer NPOM, and maybe Lav.

Pre Edit: Not clear Pook, do I need to apply pressure or just ask nicely?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:16 pm
by Galron
In post 4266, NoPowerOverMe wrote:On my read through of lavender her scum posts were less substantial if I remember.
Every time I lsee your avatar I want to barf.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:18 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 4269, Doctor Drew wrote:I am disappointed in you, thought you were ride or die with me to shred NPOM.

Obviously if any shred is going to happen besides Ice(leaning this way now tbh) I would highly prefer NPOM, and maybe Lav.

Pre Edit: Not clear Pook, do I need to apply pressure or just ask nicely?
I'm voting NPOM no?

did i get drunk last night and move it or something?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:18 pm
by Grendel
How many ppl on this roster have other game exp with Lavender?

If there were more then a few then it could explain why she never seems to be a big target for anybody this game.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:19 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
nice fucking troll Drew

you actually made me look up my own ISO to make sure my vote was on NPOM

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:21 pm
by Doctor Drew
In post 4273, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:nice fucking troll Drew

you actually made me look up my own ISO to make sure my vote was on NPOM
Could have sworn you switched to Ice? Maybe you switched it back when I was drunk.