Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:40 pm
Oh, pray do tell the class! This is not the time for shitty reaction tests.In post 4274, BBmolla wrote:zmuffin why'd you govern Nero?
Oh, pray do tell the class! This is not the time for shitty reaction tests.In post 4274, BBmolla wrote:zmuffin why'd you govern Nero?
either way we still get 1 more mislynchIn post 4273, ProHawk wrote:I just explained it man. That goverened townie framed to look scum will get mis-lynched the next day when he isn't protected. I haven't actually ran the numbers but mis-lynching today, night kill and mis-lynch tomorrow is game over right?
An hour later governor was activated.In post 4207, Lost Butterfly wrote:I am letting you know now that if Nero flips scum, I'm policy lynching you tomorrow!
In post 4231, Lost Butterfly wrote:<3
Garuda, when you're finished gloating, please tell us who we should be lynching today.
Setting the stage, all of the three posts are implying that Nero is scum, the logical process that should follow is my "policy lynch". My guess is he is now asleep which is why he hasn't hit my wagon yet.In post 4239, Lost Butterfly wrote:Unless someone wants to fess up to governing Nero, there are two possible explanations, one of which is far more likely than the other.
don't insult mebbMolla wrote:zmuffin why'd you govern Nero?
i don't think that makes a lot of sense. nero being scum is the much simpler answer.prohawk wrote:Because they know they can setup a flash-wagon on an easy town-lynch
I thought you said Esp was a lynchbaitIn post 4280, Harakiri wrote:I actually find that a likely theory, ProHawk.
Assuming both you and I are town(please indulge me this thought, ProHawk), where do we go today? Espeonage is hitting me hard with that wagon hop.
This vote feels out of place, considering how condescending you're being towards the others for wanting to flashwagon you and hara isn't voting you at the time of this post.In post 4255, ProHawk wrote:Might as well flash me since Nero is scum am-i-rite?
VOTE: Harakiri
This should be done today.
I cannot possibly believe this.In post 4259, ProHawk wrote:Town reads currently reside with Nero
That would be funny, though. And a good call if that's even 2/3rds true.In post 4262, pieguyn wrote:inb4 prohawk, nero, baldeagle scumteam of the year
including or excluding his interaction with me?In post 4264, pieguyn wrote:looking back at his interactions with people on D2 wherever right after I caught up, a lot of them felt really odd and it's been bugging me the whole game. just was too lazy to look at them again. but again, fuck it
Sounds a lot like you're trying to cop out of explaining.In post 4266, ProHawk wrote:So kill me and find out. Like I said, I honestly just don't have time to get stuff done here sorry.
Agreed with Pie below, this is WIFOM town.In post 4267, ProHawk wrote:And if you think I would put Nero in my town-reads as scum given everything that happened, you should think-again.
So you both A.) Disagree with muffin's claim that his reads are static back on D2-ish onward, and B.) Agree with his "VM is scum cuz resistance" argument (which, I might add, you cannot POSSIBLY use against me now.)In post 4271, ProHawk wrote:I don't see scum-motivation in his posts. I have played with Nero-town and this has the same feel and I have agreed with a lot of his reads and rationale. Its a quick summary.
So scum are trying to set up Nero-town to be lynched tomorrow and get another lynch today?In post 4273, ProHawk wrote:I just explained it man. That goverened townie framed to look scum will get mis-lynched the next day when he isn't protected. I haven't actually ran the numbers but mis-lynching today, night kill and mis-lynch tomorrow is game over right?
what.In post 4274, BBmolla wrote:zmuffin why'd you govern Nero?
I see the theory, but disagree with the conclusion.In post 4280, Harakiri wrote:I actually find that a likely theory, ProHawk.
Very good question.In post 4281, pieguyn wrote:also, if you think this is a scum gambit by LB, then why the hell did you vote for Harakiri over her? 0.0
if you knew this was the day before MYLO, this seems like a really odd attitude to have, especially with one of your townreads also being on the end of the rope. cause then a loss would be really imminent 0.0In post 4266, ProHawk wrote:So kill me and find out. Like I said, I honestly just don't have time to get stuff done here sorry.
yeah, if nero is town and scum were able to secure a mislynch today and we lynched him tomorrow and no night kills were blocked, then it would be a victory-plan, but that's a lot of ifs when the much simpler solution seems to be letting the lynch on nero go through if he's town.prohawk wrote:Like I said, I havent ran any numbers, but if it would be MYLO/LYLO tomorrow, this plan is a victory-plan.
who would you want to lynch today if nobody had any votes on them right now?pieguy wrote:zmuffin what should I do
Tough. I don't always get the luxury of being able to post replies directly to people, and I'm not going to pander to one person. Unless you're just as time-tied as me, it doesn't take that much work to search for your name in my post and work from there.In post 4288, ProHawk wrote:Voided, I am just going to say this because its been bugging me this whole game. If you want me to answer anything in your post, address me without the wall of edited quotes.
This does make sense, though. I'm just not sold on it coming from LB.In post 4287, ProHawk wrote:If you could force people to choose a lynch within two days by freezing the lead wagon, you setup the next days lynch, all while exerting scum-influence for pushing a quick-wagon.