Mafiascum.net

In post 4268, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 4260, Sword of Ducks wrote:I don't think that Ydrasse was kidding.

i wasnt

In post 4271, Flavor Leaf wrote:I was under the impression she's pushing tictac as a Catboi partner, not a counter wagon.

In post 4174, Nashville Dreams wrote:Why is it that you've been on every single counter to catboi but for tictac?

In post 4275, Sword of Ducks wrote:

In post 4268, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 4260, Sword of Ducks wrote:I don't think that Ydrasse was kidding.

i wasnt

Sounds about right. You wanna confess and have an easy fast trial, or do you like a slow, suffering death, just like how you want us to suffer?

In post 4251, SCP 682 wrote:yeah its more effort than you wanted to bc thats ur scumbud and you dont know what to do bc they got a good PR role

last part is a stretch but its what I would not be at all surprised to see them flip.

In post 739, tictac wrote:I don't mind being scumread.

In post 4280, The Keeper wrote:

In post 4251, SCP 682 wrote:yeah its more effort than you wanted to bc thats ur scumbud and you dont know what to do bc they got a good PR role

last part is a stretch but its what I would not be at all surprised to see them flip.

I don't even effort to save myself why would I save a buddy?

In post 4277, butterchurn wrote:

In post 4271, Flavor Leaf wrote:I was under the impression she's pushing tictac as a Catboi partner, not a counter wagon.

In post 4174, Nashville Dreams wrote:Why is it that you've been on every single counter to catboi but for tictac?

In post 4269, Sword of Ducks wrote:

In post 4263, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 4257, Cephrir wrote:bnuuy (5) | mastina, Klick, Menalque, cassowary, catboi

lol, this wagon's so scummy, probably scummiest one this game.

gotta agree here...someone there wants us dead and I don't know who it is

In post 4281, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really get why tic tac is scum instead of a mildly useless town.

In post 4286, SCP 682 wrote:SoD is blatantly town rofl

In post 4254, SCP 682 wrote:

In post 4252, The Keeper wrote:

In post 4217, SCP 682 wrote:tictac is literally not even trying to solve the game and when he is town he actually shows that energy i am not moving from this slot


keeper's "meta" read on him is completely bunk and a lie because keeper can't even cite specific attributes of tictac's play to show that they are actually thinking about the meta and how it applies to tictac's alignment. fae is just trying to dismantle the wagon on tictac by any means necessary rather than address the logic.

when explained to that the reason was never the "lurking" status -> keeper immediately shut up and had nothing to provide.

Actually i can, I just can't be arsed.
Control Tac had the same one liner approach, only responded when questioned.
XIVTac I don't even remember them they were that quiet.

They don't sit and actively solve. They're a passive player, just like I'm meant to be.

oh really?
please provide examples. like i've constantly asked you to (:

In post 3652, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 3650, butterchurn wrote:

In post 3646, Nashville Dreams wrote:wanna know whats really annoying

those who are pushing "us" as a lurker there is other players who have little posts as well and aren't having fire placed under their ass

You keep minimizing the case against you as just being about being a lurker. I don't think that's remotely close to the bulk of the case for most people voting.

I mean a lot of it has to do with people disliking titus posts
which i cant really do anything about b/c they werent written by me

as for people scumreading my slot -- a lot of people have mentioned it as omg "mala is lurking" "mala is disinterested = scum-mala"

In post 3475, Well Done wrote:

In post 3472, Well Done wrote:This also doesn't make sense to me

Because in 1675 Titus seems to have a townread on catboi. In 1684 is the weird switch in perspective, both posts coming from Titus.

Then in 3063 Titus passes it off as Mala being the one who scumread catboi, and pointed to "the number of counters expressed". Except that all seems to have been from Titus herself, not from Mala. I also think that this post forgets that they already did the work in 2071

In post 3472, Well Done wrote:

In post 1675, Nashville Dreams wrote:I'm starting to feel ill so I must question my reads from this morning.

Can someone briefly give me points where they feel I'm wrong besides catboi is too town to be town?

~Titus

In post 1684, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 1676, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

In post 1675, Nashville Dreams wrote:I'm starting to feel ill so I must question my reads from this morning.

Can someone briefly give me points where they feel I'm wrong besides catboi is too town to be town?

~Titus

You showed up late. You need to look at that bnuuy wagon.

I will but I feel that it's another counter to catboi. That makes me think town before reading.

However, I am open to being wrong. It's also getting to the point where there are so many counters that catboi may need to be eliminated as catboi couldn't live until elo.

~Titus

In post 3063, Nashville Dreams wrote:If I am active, I can and do come up with solutions regardless of alignment. I do what I can.

Ftr, Mala was in favor of catboi town. The number of counters expressed is telling. Later today, I intend to compare if it's the same players given my wagon took off after debating going with Mala's read due to game circumstances.

~Titus

In post 3064, Nashville Dreams wrote:*catboi scum. Typo.

This also doesn't make sense to me

In post 3473, Well Done wrote:

In post 2071, Titus wrote:The only difference I see is who is doing the voting. If it was people familiar with me, I would lean towards scum saving catboi. Yet Butter and Wallflower are not familiar with me.

In post 3063, Nashville Dreams wrote:If I am active, I can and do come up with solutions regardless of alignment. I do what I can.

Ftr, Mala was in favor of catboi town. The number of counters expressed is telling. Later today, I intend to compare if it's the same players given my wagon took off after debating going with Mala's read due to game circumstances.

~Titus

Doesn't 2071 imply that Titus already did what they are saying they intend to do later today - compare the players

In post 3469, Well Done wrote:

In post 2113, Well Done wrote:

In post 2109, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 1705, butterchurn wrote:<snip>

This is a good post! It also looks to me like Nashville Dreams weren't able to maintain internal consistency and forgot who they were supposed to be sussing by confusing Monkeyman with catboi.

I'll keep reading, but based on the most recent VC and scrolling through the last few pages, it doesn't look like the wagon on them developed much further, which is kind of odd, because I feel like this is more solid that anything else that's happened so far this game.

Also:

In post 2070, Titus wrote:Interesting how I postulate that voting Catboi might be required for the game state causes us to be a counter to catboi. This definitely means I need to reset my catboi read when I catch up.

In post 2071, Titus wrote:The only difference I see is who is doing the voting. If it was people familiar with me, I would lean towards scum saving catboi. Yet Butter and Wallflower are not familiar with me.

Would like for Nashville Dreams to acknowledge posts 1705, 2109, 2113/2116 at some point

In post 4290, The Keeper wrote:

In post 4254, SCP 682 wrote:

In post 4252, The Keeper wrote:

In post 4217, SCP 682 wrote:tictac is literally not even trying to solve the game and when he is town he actually shows that energy i am not moving from this slot


keeper's "meta" read on him is completely bunk and a lie because keeper can't even cite specific attributes of tictac's play to show that they are actually thinking about the meta and how it applies to tictac's alignment. fae is just trying to dismantle the wagon on tictac by any means necessary rather than address the logic.

when explained to that the reason was never the "lurking" status -> keeper immediately shut up and had nothing to provide.

Actually i can, I just can't be arsed.
Control Tac had the same one liner approach, only responded when questioned.
XIVTac I don't even remember them they were that quiet.

They don't sit and actively solve. They're a passive player, just like I'm meant to be.

oh really?
please provide examples. like i've constantly asked you to (:

Why bother? You're so blinded to whatever I post and given your record of arrogance, I don't want to bother. I can link the first 10 posts from this game, to CONTROL, to XIV, and they're same energy.
Because I'm comparing Large Theme to Large Theme.
you know, the games that have 23 players, multiple large personalities and 16 pages crop up after a nap... it changes how you play.

Basement XL you go WAY more careful because that one lil green fly can wreck your Devil Deal chances, it takes a shop and 2 secret rooms from you as well as a curse room. You play entirely differently.

In post 4284, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 4277, butterchurn wrote:

In post 4271, Flavor Leaf wrote:I was under the impression she's pushing tictac as a Catboi partner, not a counter wagon.

In post 4174, Nashville Dreams wrote:Why is it that you've been on every single counter to catboi but for tictac?

I think overanalyzing it. While I wouldn't necessarily call it a direct counterwagon, it is pulling away from Catboi pressure. there's 2 votes on Catboi. This is the smallest it's been.

I think there's 100% merit in believing Tictac is a possible scum partner of Catboi, and she looks to be genuinely investigating you, and I think it's a good push on you, tbh.

I had the exact same suspicions on you earlier but less analytical.

And if you're so against Nashville here, why did you join Tictac?

In post 4261, SCP 682 wrote:keeper thinks they can cite things that i have not seen myself yet as evidence since they think i cant refute it when like the game is literally right there and im going to go straight into it and as I am sure i am right - I will find they are incorrect.

also the points of "one liners" - I never said "one liners" were scummy.

and "being quiet"

like damn .... sounds like a lot of not actually disproving the actual case against tictac and trying to brute force the case being waved away ...