Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:08 am
Not itIn post 4260, inspectorscout wrote:We'll see who actually is the VI in the end.
Not itIn post 4260, inspectorscout wrote:We'll see who actually is the VI in the end.
No - not really. There's a difference between not agreeing with something and not caring about something. Just because people don't agree with her reads, people still were commenting about it and trying to engage with her. I don't feel like her jump from giving reads -> please lynch me to be genuine, it feels fabricated. The AtE part I have much less of a problem with, it really doesn't concern me that much, it's more of a playstyle thing (of course if you're ~only~ using AtE to the exclusion of trying to figure the game out that's a different matter of talk - and which applies to MDS).In post 4267, pieguyn wrote:also, it is reasonable that she would hold the belief that no one cares about her reads when she's been pushing Jester-town the entire game and no one except Vedith gave her any time of day about this read.
I mean between a null read that's been inactive and a person that's actively trying to push another mislynch on account of made up bs it's pretty obvious who you should go for. You can make the association and relationship hunt after a scumflip, but right now it's extremely important we lynch a person who has the highest chance of flipping scum so we don't enter lylo.In post 4279, pieguyn wrote:if Jester is scum, I think it's Jester, Parama, +1.In post 4278, Kagami wrote:Who do you think would be most likely scum with jester?
+this for what I just saidIn post 4279, pieguyn wrote:if Jester is scum, I think it's Jester, Parama, +1.In post 4278, Kagami wrote:Who do you think would be most likely scum with jester?
I think you must not be reading my posts.In post 4299, Dunnstral wrote:That's what I've been saying.In post 4247, pieguyn wrote:thing is if we go through with the Jester lynch and it's town, then we probably just lose.
So why are you voting Jester, instead of Parama group?
It sounds like you've already figured it out.In post 4303, pieguyn wrote:since then I've been attempting to figure out where to go.
I'm liking myself too!In post 4288, Kagami wrote:What's the issue with SAD? I was liking him on review.
Do I tend to tunnel a bit on people? Yes. But were those my strongest scumreads at that point? Yes. I actively keep a tier list of people in my head whenever I'm playing a game, it's not that I ~ignore~ people. It's just that people in the top or in the middle null pile do not interest me enough, unless I catch something from their posts that I want to comment on. I'm always reevaluating reads when I read, but usually I like just reading the interactions with people and focusing on the people I want to push, or interaction with people who are scumreading me. It was extremely boring during the first day because a lot of people were waving me as town, and I hate that because it narrows down the people I am interested in interacting with.In post 4289, pieguyn wrote:he's said a lot, but when I actually look at it from the top I'm a bit concerned about the way he focused almost entirely on MDS and S_S' pair to the near exclusion of any other push and I'm a bit concerned that I could be biasing towards him because he posts in a very logical style that resonates with me a lot.
What if I'm pushing dunnscum's agenda right nowIn post 4306, Dunnstral wrote:scout - in time my friend follow up
TheIn post 4300, Dunnstral wrote:Not itIn post 4260, inspectorscout wrote:We'll see who actually is the VI in the end.
Depends on the plausibility of more exotic scenarios, such as teams including MDS rather than jester. We're at a pretty critical juncture here and I'd rather not rush it.In post 4305, Dunnstral wrote:Kagami what do you think? About The Parama pair being our best lynch as opposed to jester pair
In post 4311, inspectorscout wrote:TheIn post 4300, Dunnstral wrote:Not itIn post 4260, inspectorscout wrote:We'll see who actually is the VI in the end.
F.
I'm voting HS-Parama palinspectorscout wrote:What if I'm pushing dunnscum's agenda right nowIn post 4306, Dunnstral wrote:scout - in time my friend follow up
AgreedIn post 4312, Kagami wrote:We're at a pretty critical juncture here
I wasn't pushing you when I asked you the question early in the day. How is that hard to understand?In post 4316, pieguyn wrote:"overreacting and acting like he was pushing me", then in his next post he agrees he was pushing me...)
This isn't pushing on you.In post 3918, Dunnstral wrote:Alright. Why should people be town reading you at this point in the game?In post 3902, pieguyn wrote:"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.
After all, isn't "aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" your game so far?
Follow-up question: Who's townreading you, and what's your opinion on them
In post 3889, Dunnstral wrote:So why the sudden shift?In post 3879, pieguyn wrote:not really. the most substantive discussion we had over the night phase was mhsmith hoping we'd die and us agreeing that Cv666's strategy was stupid.In post 3877, Dunnstral wrote:@mhsmith/pieguy did you guys discuss things overnight?
How come yesterday you two were gung-ho on each other but today you both want to lynch multiple other people
In post 3894, Dunnstral wrote:Where I'm at right now:
HS/Parama top lynch
Mhsmith/Pieguy close second
Would lynch either of those two
at a distant third I have Jester pair
And then we'll see from there. Evaluate Kagami and Scout pair if needed
In post 3905, Dunnstral wrote:There are two pairs that are scummierIn post 3899, pieguyn wrote:how do you possibly justify keeping Jester alive?
I didn't say I thought jester pair was town. They're my third choice for a lynch. Kagami really wants to lynch that pair as well.
I think the first two pairs I mentioned definitely contain scum. Even if that scum ends up being you. I haven't liked your entrance into today.
YES, YES.In post 3910, Dunnstral wrote:Looks like you're making up reasons to lynch other people without outright defending mhsmith (which you can't really do if you're scum and he's town since his scumminess levels were way up there)In post 3904, pieguyn wrote:for one, Kagami has already commented on my reads and said we were mostly on the same page.In post 3900, Dunnstral wrote:Saying you want to lynch a bunch of other people before your pair doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I thought you wanted to lynch Shadow because you wanted to discuss with Kagami? There seems to be a mutual lack of that
we don't seem to strongly disagree on anyone besides HS, and we seem to agree on Parama regardless, so... /shrug
don't really know what your point here is