Mafiascum.net

In post 4297, Cephrir wrote:My mastina read is I dont think it's worth trying to read her for a few more days. If she is scum, she will run out of energy for the game and her fatigue will begin to show through in every post by endgame.

I understand that it is my natural inclination to always scumread her and I've found this strategy more successful than actually trying, as well as less frustrating because I do find reading her posts to be challenging.

In post 4298, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4296, The Three Bears wrote:Didn't answer the question and verbosity means nothing in terms of alignment.

What question did I not answer? I see two questions and two answers here.

In post 4299, Andante wrote:See, Ceph, I don't see you and mastina as partners, and if there's 1 maf in yall, it's more likely it's you, and the early posts about sheeping mastina were you trying to pocket her here. that's just my thought on all this

In post 4301, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:

In post 4299, Andante wrote:See, Ceph, I don't see you and mastina as partners, and if there's 1 maf in yall, it's more likely it's you, and the early posts about sheeping mastina were you trying to pocket her here. that's just my thought on all this

omg u made a post i agree w how did this happen. am i goin soft.

In post 4299, Andante wrote:See, Ceph, I don't see you and mastina as partners, and if there's 1 maf in yall, it's more likely it's you, and the early posts about sheeping mastina were you trying to pocket her here. that's just my thought on all this

In post 4301, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:

In post 4299, Andante wrote:See, Ceph, I don't see you and mastina as partners, and if there's 1 maf in yall, it's more likely it's you, and the early posts about sheeping mastina were you trying to pocket her here. that's just my thought on all this

omg u made a post i agree w how did this happen. am i goin soft.

In post 1396, Cephrir wrote:I will sheep mastina when the seas go dry and mountains blow in the wind like leaves.

In post 1401, Cephrir wrote:I have no idea what mastina's alignment is. Call me on day 4.

In post 1402, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1400, Andante wrote:

In post 1396, Cephrir wrote:I will sheep mastina when the seas go dry and mountains blow in the wind like leaves.

so mastina is town? I'll sheep you and dragons if yall agree on someone

I mean I think we both still want to kill roden but I want to see where this arcade wagon goes.

In post 1396, Cephrir wrote:I will sheep mastina when the seas go dry and mountains blow in the wind like leaves.

In post 4313, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Last time i checked, the seas are not dry.

In post 165, Galron wrote:I think Bell is balcony posting, but I'll go along with this for no good reason.

VOTE: Ircher

In post 2097, Galron wrote:I'm ambivalent about Ircher quite frankly.

In post 2098, Galron wrote:VOTE: ircher

In post 2462, Galron wrote:VOTE: Ircher Tet has a point. If Ircher is a TFN, he's done his job, and he is just going to be hanging out in the weeds everyone wondering "hmm..." Unless Bears' info is so overwhelming or something else comes to light, this is the right play. Yesterday was a slog, and it would be nice to find out why.

In post 4316, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:in my defense here i literally was scannin d1 cuz it was brutal, i just missed the second bit

In post 4317, Cephrir wrote:did u know galron is a player in this game

In post 1807, tictac wrote:

In post 1719, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1660, tictac wrote:too much consensus on irch

Then what is your explanation for him not being dead yet?

folks don't die from mean looks.
could be wrong on my read on thread temp, but don't currently think so

In post 1986, tictac wrote:yea, still don't think day 1 is shaped like this w ircher-scum

VOTE: andante
this is okay as far as compromise goes tho. lets see if it has legs.

In post 2468, tictac wrote:RB existence in 20p game p much a given imo.
why not just kill town irch here tho?
p sure he wasn't the nk target cause then they don't use a block on him. (unless catboy suicidal!scum or jailed block on town!irch existed both super unlikely)
still don't really scumread him outside of the claims stuff, and also not inclined to go 4 info-yeet. dunno.

bears-stuff: having a role reason to ask 4 info is pretty standard and i'd be inclined to cooperate w such. generally best practice to let folks play their own prs like they will and if later on turns out the reasoning was insufficient that is an issue for then.

pedit: wot norw: u finnish? i thought u were from norway or some such.

In post 492, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh wow, never mind that Bell read.
Their shading of Ircher wagon is yucky.

In post 687, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m confident on my spot in this wagon. I’d expect Ircher to have towntold by this point. But i don’t get any good vibes.

In post 719, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 711, Bell wrote:Norwe,
Sweet Norwe.
Stop focusing on all the suspicion and instead speak with me.
I suspect you because you don't really seem to be suspecting anyone else.
Let's talk about that.
Who do you suspect?

I’m voting Ircher because i don’t townread them. I don’t have super strong scumreads. Just scumleans on some slots.
Besides, it’s hard for me to go ballistic when i’m typing on a phone and my connection dies every 10 minutes.

In post 724, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 721, The Three Bears wrote:like honestly, if everyone TRed ircher, i'd be the one tunneling him but thats not happening so im defending because irchers probs just town if everyone is tunneling him. this logic is normally right i think.

No. It’s dumb.

In post 732, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There are 6 people voting Ircher based on 21 fucking players. And you’re trying to frame it as if Ircher is either just town being tunneled again. (When i’ve never tunneled Ircher in any prior games because i usually townread them by that point) or do you think scum are pushing the wagon? Ok, how many? 4 out of 6? Isn’t it more strange that this wagon has so little support and counterwagons pop up sll the time? Ircher has never been any serious threat and this wagon hasn’t even been that big. And yet you’re trying to kill it when you have no fucking idea what it is you are talking about. Just stop saying stupid things or i might have to revert my townread just to make sure your stupid ass doesn’t get anymore influence in this game if you’re going to go on like this.

In post 810, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t have a lot of scumreads tbh. That’s part of the reason why i’m feeling this wagon on Ircher is good. Because it gives allignment indicative info. And bonus points for me not townreading Ircher in the first place.

In post 825, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This isn’t to say i’m locked in on Ircher. I just don’t see any reason to switch. They have not felt townie to me and it’s an wagon with decent amount of support, so it won’t be an waste of time.

In post 828, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The Roden push, i think it’s good. Counterwagons are always informative, but i’m personally not as convinced that’d flip scum as i am Ircher.
So i’m still arguing the same thing because i don’t see any reason to switch and other wagons suggested so far haven’t been interesting to me.
If anyone disagrees eith me there, that is awesome. But make yourself heard, or i’m just gonna try to run the show. Because i don’t like messing around.

In post 1811, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ceph do you think Ircher would have been limmed right now if they were either scum/town?

In post 1824, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Mastina
I see you are online. Do you still agree with Ircher wagon? I want to flip this to death so we can move on.

In post 1835, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mush your posts aren't really helping to push Ircher. No offense.
It's just like noise at this point.

In post 1843, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And regarding Ircher all i see is "This is NAI. The slot is NAI"
VOTE ON A WAGON TO MAKE IT E-1 IT’S DAY ONE. It doesn’t have to be an rainbow invite from the top scumhunters of MS that you are safely placing your vote on an certified scumflip wagon.

In post 1844, NorwegianboyEE wrote:IS IRCHER TOWN? NO?
VOTE.