Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 11:49 am
Toog is absolutely the scummiest lurker. Cat Scratch I don't think qualifies as a lurker but I have suspicion there as well.
Sick and twisted behavior. I also have a hard time taking this game seriously, but this isn't a funny joke.In post 4283, Ydrasse wrote:UGHHHH
sod. sit with me my child. listen to my words:
i have a hard time taking this game seriously and derive a lot of joy from being goofy even to my own detriment readwise
and that means i will lean more and more into fakeclaiming scum if it makes me smile
but you have my word i am not a malefactor. i make no promises otherwise
I can literally give you MU games where I actively don't save myself.In post 4282, SCP 682 wrote:source: trust me buddyIn post 4280, The Keeper wrote:I don't even effort to save myself why would I save a buddy?In post 4251, SCP 682 wrote:yeah its more effort than you wanted to bc thats ur scumbud and you dont know what to do bc they got a good PR role
last part is a stretch but its what I would not be at all surprised to see them flip.
Why does he refer to bunny as us? or what is this post?In post 4269, Sword of Ducks wrote:gotta agree here...someone there wants us dead and I don't know who it isIn post 4263, Flavor Leaf wrote:lol, this wagon's so scummy, probably scummiest one this game.In post 4257, Cephrir wrote:bnuuy (5) | mastina, Klick, Menalque, cassowary, catboi
In post 4302, SCP 682 wrote:their logic is completely upside down
what hammers it in is him siding with keeper providing vague bullshit
Do you see me arguing the votes and pressure? Absolutely not.In post 4294, SCP 682 wrote:again.In post 4290, The Keeper wrote:Why bother? You're so blinded to whatever I post and given your record of arrogance, I don't want to bother. I can link the first 10 posts from this game, to CONTROL, to XIV, and they're same energy.In post 4254, SCP 682 wrote:oh really?In post 4252, The Keeper wrote:Actually i can, I just can't be arsed.In post 4217, SCP 682 wrote:tictac is literally not even trying to solve the game and when he is town he actually shows that energy i am not moving from this slot
keeper's "meta" read on him is completely bunk and a lie because keeper can't even cite specific attributes of tictac's play to show that they are actually thinking about the meta and how it applies to tictac's alignment. fae is just trying to dismantle the wagon on tictac by any means necessary rather than address the logic.
when explained to that the reason was never the "lurking" status -> keeper immediately shut up and had nothing to provide.
Control Tac had the same one liner approach, only responded when questioned.
XIVTac I don't even remember them they were that quiet.
They don't sit and actively solve. They're a passive player, just like I'm meant to be.
please provide examples. like i've constantly asked you to (:
Because I'm comparing Large Theme to Large Theme.
you know, the games that have 23 players, multiple large personalities and 16 pages crop up after a nap... it changes how you play.
Basement XL you go WAY more careful because that one lil green fly can wreck your Devil Deal chances, it takes a shop and 2 secret rooms from you as well as a curse room. You play entirely differently.
squid game.
tyvm
and at best you are arguing this it is simply viable for tictac to be town.
let the pressure be there and see how he reacts and step aside in that case.
so tyvm
He is, check his ISO.In post 4304, Nero Cain wrote:if SOD is obvtown
Us, as in, us the town.In post 4304, Nero Cain wrote:if SOD is obvtown can someone help explain something to me.
Why does he refer to bunny as us? or what is this post?In post 4269, Sword of Ducks wrote:gotta agree here...someone there wants us dead and I don't know who it isIn post 4263, Flavor Leaf wrote:lol, this wagon's so scummy, probably scummiest one this game.In post 4257, Cephrir wrote:bnuuy (5) | mastina, Klick, Menalque, cassowary, catboi
ah this is flea.In post 4303, The Keeper wrote:I can literally give you MU games where I actively don't save myself.In post 4282, SCP 682 wrote:source: trust me buddyIn post 4280, The Keeper wrote:I don't even effort to save myself why would I save a buddy?In post 4251, SCP 682 wrote:yeah its more effort than you wanted to bc thats ur scumbud and you dont know what to do bc they got a good PR role
last part is a stretch but its what I would not be at all surprised to see them flip.
Literally, like almost all my posts after that point. I even quoted this series of posts before.In post 4291, Well Done wrote:You're right, it wasn't written by you.In post 3652, Nashville Dreams wrote:I mean a lot of it has to do with people disliking titus postsIn post 3650, butterchurn wrote:You keep minimizing the case against you as just being about being a lurker. I don't think that's remotely close to the bulk of the case for most people voting.In post 3646, Nashville Dreams wrote:wanna know whats really annoying
those who are pushing "us" as a lurker there is other players who have little posts as well and aren't having fire placed under their ass
which i cant really do anything about b/c they werent written by me
as for people scumreading my slot -- a lot of people have mentioned it as omg "mala is lurking" "mala is disinterested = scum-mala"
Thing is, What Titus says contradicts you. They say that you were the one pushing this and they were following your read. I pointed this out in post 3475.
Here it is again:
In post 3475, Well Done wrote:Because in 1675 Titus seems to have a townread on catboi. In 1684 is the weird switch in perspective, both posts coming from Titus.In post 3472, Well Done wrote:This also doesn't make sense to me
Then in 3063 Titus passes it off as Mala being the one who scumread catboi, and pointed to "the number of counters expressed". Except that all seems to have been from Titus herself, not from Mala. I also think that this post forgets that they already did the work in 2071In post 3472, Well Done wrote:In post 1675, Nashville Dreams wrote:I'm starting to feel ill so I must question my reads from this morning.
Can someone briefly give me points where they feel I'm wrong besides catboi is too town to be town?
~TitusIn post 1684, Nashville Dreams wrote:I will but I feel that it's another counter to catboi. That makes me think town before reading.In post 1676, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You showed up late. You need to look at that bnuuy wagon.In post 1675, Nashville Dreams wrote:I'm starting to feel ill so I must question my reads from this morning.
Can someone briefly give me points where they feel I'm wrong besides catboi is too town to be town?
~Titus
However, I am open to being wrong. It's also getting to the point where there are so many counters that catboi may need to be eliminated as catboi couldn't live until elo.
~TitusIn post 3063, Nashville Dreams wrote:If I am active, I can and do come up with solutions regardless of alignment. I do what I can.
Ftr, Mala was in favor of catboi town. The number of counters expressed is telling. Later today, I intend to compare if it's the same players given my wagon took off after debating going with Mala's read due to game circumstances.
~TitusThis also doesn't make sense to meIn post 3064, Nashville Dreams wrote:*catboi scum. Typo.In post 3473, Well Done wrote:In post 2071, Titus wrote:The only difference I see is who is doing the voting. If it was people familiar with me, I would lean towards scum saving catboi. Yet Butter and Wallflower are not familiar with me.Doesn't 2071 imply that Titus already did what they are saying they intend to do later today - compare the playersIn post 3063, Nashville Dreams wrote:If I am active, I can and do come up with solutions regardless of alignment. I do what I can.
Ftr, Mala was in favor of catboi town. The number of counters expressed is telling. Later today, I intend to compare if it's the same players given my wagon took off after debating going with Mala's read due to game circumstances.
~TitusIn post 3469, Well Done wrote:Would like for Nashville Dreams to acknowledge posts 1705, 2109, 2113/2116 at some pointIn post 2113, Well Done wrote:Also:In post 2109, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This is a good post! It also looks to me like Nashville Dreams weren't able to maintain internal consistency and forgot who they were supposed to be sussing by confusing Monkeyman with catboi.In post 1705, butterchurn wrote:<snip>
I'll keep reading, but based on the most recent VC and scrolling through the last few pages, it doesn't look like the wagon on them developed much further, which is kind of odd, because I feel like this is more solid that anything else that's happened so far this game.
In post 2070, Titus wrote:Interesting how I postulate that voting Catboi might be required for the game state causes us to be a counter to catboi. This definitely means I need to reset my catboi read when I catch up.In post 2071, Titus wrote:The only difference I see is who is doing the voting. If it was people familiar with me, I would lean towards scum saving catboi. Yet Butter and Wallflower are not familiar with me.
I have 32 posts in 5 days, which is like... Way above average for me.In post 4300, butterchurn wrote:Toog is absolutely the scummiest lurker. Cat Scratch I don't think qualifies as a lurker but I have suspicion there as well.
I feel similarly. I'm still very hesitant on SCP, but I think Save the Dragons is one of the towniest people in the game. I know you're suspicious of Ydrasse, but I've been townreading that slot for a while as well. The only sticking point for me is Nashville.In post 4305, Flavor Leaf wrote:wagoning does make sense for tictac to be scum. i really think so. Unless one of my Monkery's are scum, but idk if SCP plays this way as scum.
And STD been really independent, i feel, and i dont get scum vibes from them like i did last time, but i might be putting too much merit into my trust, but i genuinely do understand STD.
Idk. I see a Tictac scum case from reasons completely outside of TicTac.
And almost none of them say anything about the game. I believe that's referred to as active lurking.In post 4316, Toogeloo wrote:I have 32 posts in 5 days, which is like... Way above average for me.In post 4300, butterchurn wrote:Toog is absolutely the scummiest lurker. Cat Scratch I don't think qualifies as a lurker but I have suspicion there as well.
To be fair, I haven't even read that much. Like I said, maybe a total of 750 posts, and that's pretty generous.In post 4319, butterchurn wrote:And almost none of them say anything about the game. I believe that's referred to as active lurking.In post 4316, Toogeloo wrote:I have 32 posts in 5 days, which is like... Way above average for me.In post 4300, butterchurn wrote:Toog is absolutely the scummiest lurker. Cat Scratch I don't think qualifies as a lurker but I have suspicion there as well.
I wouldn't assume tictac is the day's wagon. Or that this Day won't go on much longer. We probably have a least another 50 pages to go. We've had wagons go up to 9 that should have gone through and didn't, for some reason. What makes you think I'm scum?In post 4320, Nero Cain wrote:tictac is prob the days wagon and at 170 pages this day shouldn't go on much longer but wanted to put my vote on scum for the time being.
VOTE: butterchurn
For what it's worth, I understand the suspicion for Nashville early, I just didn't feel like they were scum.In post 4317, butterchurn wrote:I feel similarly. I'm still very hesitant on SCP, but I think Save the Dragons is one of the towniest people in the game. I know you're suspicious of Ydrasse, but I've been townreading that slot for a while as well. The only sticking point for me is Nashville.In post 4305, Flavor Leaf wrote:wagoning does make sense for tictac to be scum. i really think so. Unless one of my Monkery's are scum, but idk if SCP plays this way as scum.
And STD been really independent, i feel, and i dont get scum vibes from them like i did last time, but i might be putting too much merit into my trust, but i genuinely do understand STD.
Idk. I see a Tictac scum case from reasons completely outside of TicTac.