Page 174 of 236
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:29 am
by Dunnstral
Right. That's not openly pushing you, I'm asking reasonable questions to solve the game
Granted, if I recall I was scumreading your entrance into the day (there might be something in our pt to show that)
I didn't push for a lynch on you. I've been voting HS all day
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:30 am
by Dunnstral
You seem(ed) to have a problem with me even showing suspicion directed at you.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:30 am
by Dunnstral
In post 4323, pieguyn wrote:AND HOW YOUR BEHAVIOR CLEARLY SUGGESTS YOU AREN'T ATTEMPTING TO TIE PARAMA'S PAIR AND MY PAIR TOGETHER.
Well, they are tied together.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:31 am
by Dunnstral
I'm only pointing things that exist as connections out. I'm not fabricating realities
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:33 am
by Dunnstral
Oh, right. Looking back Kagami was telling me she wasn't concerned with your pair at the time of that posting, you keep failing to mention that I included Kagami as a tie-in
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:35 am
by pieguyn
OK, so where is this magical point where you asking me "reasonable questions to solve the game" becomes a push?
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:38 am
by pieguyn
In post 4329, Dunnstral wrote:Oh, right. Looking back Kagami was telling me she wasn't concerned with your pair at the time of that posting, you keep failing to mention that I included Kagami as a tie-in
I literally do not care in the slightest if you also brought up Kagami. you're attempting to invent an interaction between Parama's pair and my pair that is in reality completely stupid. you throwing Kagami in there on top of us does nothing to change this and you are just obfuscating here.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:40 am
by Dunnstral
In post 3918, Dunnstral wrote: In post 3902, pieguyn wrote: In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.
"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.
Alright. Why should people be town reading you at this point in the game?
After all, isn't "aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" your game so far?
Follow-up question: Who's townreading you, and what's your opinion on them
Right after this, where you say:
In post 3928, pieguyn wrote:Dunn fits with parama and Jester, I think.
their reads feel off and forced and
3910 is a typical scum sort of "ignoring the motivation someone posts in the game thread to invent some cosmic motivation for someone's posts" push.
In response to me is where I seriously start to consider it as a push.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:42 am
by Dunnstral
In post 4331, pieguyn wrote:you're attempting to invent an interaction between Parama's pair and my pair
I'm not making anything up. What I pointed out was factually correct. You can argue that the lack of interaction doesn't tie you together, but you can't argue that I'm making up a lack of interaction between your pairs
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:46 am
by pieguyn
you are literally just attempting to argue semantics at this point. "oh, here's these posts where I'm asking you 'reasonable questions to solve the game', then I continue to give you the exact same treatment and at some point or another I declare it a 'push'".
you cannot attempt to make the claim that I "overreacted" to you and "acted like you were pushing me" when what you were doing was the exact same thing that you then turned around and called a "push" later
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:47 am
by Dunnstral
The question isn't meant to be accusatory in nature. I explained that if you're town you should be looking there. I was hoping to discuss that with you.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:48 am
by Kagami
No, smith fits in very nicely.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:48 am
by Kagami
Extremely nicely...
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:49 am
by pieguyn
I am arguing that 1. this is the case, and 2. you clearly brought it up in a context meant to imply we were scum together for it, despite the fact that "theyre ignoring each other" is a shit interaction even for solo players, so attempting to handwave rule it over entire pairs is even more stupid.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:49 am
by Kagami
What is parama at?
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:50 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
Pie can I have a concrete read on mhsmith from you on where you currently stand?
And while you're here, Dunn and Kagami, how are you reading each other right now?
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:51 am
by Dunnstral
What do you think Kagami? Do you think there are meaningful interactions between mhsmith/pieguy and HS/parama (probably from before I called them out on it)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:52 am
by Dunnstral
There should only be 2 out of 6 votes needed on him.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:52 am
by pieguyn
I'm going to go ISO him so I can see if I can pick up on whatever you're seeing, but: if it reaches the point where Parama and Jester are scum, would you agree to consolidate and let SAD/scout live to the end?
p-edit: I think slightly more likely town, but nowhere near strong town or and I would not fight to be the last pair standing if other people don't want it.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:56 am
by Kagami
Well, I'm going to re-evaluate after each successful scumlynch, but I'm open to leaving as soon as we can agree to a high confidence T-T pair.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:56 am
by Dunnstral
In post 4340, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Pie can I have a concrete read on mhsmith from you on where you currently stand?
And while you're here, Dunn and Kagami, how are you reading each other right now?
I hold suspicions towards Kagami. I would however not consider voting our pair out at this time. I think if HS is indeed scum the chance of Kagami being scum goes up. Kagami is hard to read.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:57 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
Only me and Dunn I believe are on her since HS unvoted and then voted me-scout.
A lot of people have been calling out her weird and terrible posting today, but they don't vote her, which is worrying and annoying me.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:58 am
by Dunnstral
In post 4344, Kagami wrote:but I'm open to leaving as soon as we can agree to a high confidence T-T pair.
I'm going to remember this for later.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:59 am
by Kagami
In post 4340, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Pie can I have a concrete read on mhsmith from you on where you currently stand?
And while you're here, Dunn and Kagami, how are you reading each other right now?
I would need a more compelling reason to think he's scum than I've seen thus far for me to leave the dance, and I'm not going to play around with driving a lynch on him if I come to think he's scum with any confidence.
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:00 pm
by Dunnstral
What's your reason now?