Mafiascum.net

In post 4254, Ankamius wrote:or alternatively

you could play the game instead of trying to brute force everybody to bend to your will for no reason other than your name

???

RC wasn’t even involved in coalition vote.

I would rather if we did vengeful after this.

Too early for vengeful.

idk, I wanted to reduce the number of players needed to coalition.

In post 4258, Titus wrote:At the end of D1, Clemency with Overkill has high viability

Why Clem over Chemist?

In Necromancer, there was this mechanic which scum controlled, called “harmless zombie. That’s how I knew Brass was lockscum in it. Well, scum!Overkill11 would have to know by now that no one would sheep him on BEF lynch. RC was yelling at us for voting Creature/Chemist because alleged bussing but he really shouldn’t have, because if Overkill11 is scum like I believe he is, he voted Creature/Chemist and didn’t support the coalition, so everyone would do the converse. So, if Overkill11 is scum, high chance one scum in Creature/Chemist and I don’t think it’s Creature.

Also, I’ve played 2 games with town!Chemist and he didn’t detail case anyone in either of those games. Chances are, his reads may be accurate.

In post 4261, Moongrass wrote:I would veto {MariaR, Clemency, 0verkill, Timedevil}

I really think Maria is town though. I don’t even understand why anyone thinks she’s scummy.

In post 4262, Titus wrote:Based on dance partners vote day, Creature Chemist likely contains the last scum

I think the apocalypse just happened.

In post 4263, MariaR wrote:0verkill/Moon/Time/Chenn would be mine

Problem with this, is none of them were in coalition. Without one slot from the coalition in this, veto is pointless.

Yo I haven’t been feeling like playing mafia today but I’ll probably be back this afternoon

In post 4266, RadiantCowbells wrote:wasn't the whole point of using veto to clear the coalition pool

why are there so many suggestions with no coalition members

Exactly, we need to eliminate who is most likely scum from there.

In post 4267, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4262, Titus wrote:Based on dance partners vote day, Creature Chemist likely contains the last scum

Chemist > Creature

Could go Chemist, Clemency, Creature, Overkill. Gets rid of LHF

I don’t think Overkill11 is LHF.

In post 4270, Ankamius wrote:

In post 4266, RadiantCowbells wrote:wasn't the whole point of using veto to clear the coalition pool

why are there so many suggestions with no coalition members

what does this even mean

???

oh throw chemist in the veto then

In post 4278, Ankamius wrote:I'm supporting an overkill/TD/chenn/x veto

until I see a damn good reason to do otherwise, I'm not supporting it

Why wouldn’t you want at least one slot from the coalition? Am I taking crazy pills here or what?

{NanceFloor, RadiantCowbells, themilkcartonkid}
{Skygazer, Creature}
{Ankamius, Chemist1422}
{Clemency}

{ank, clem, chemist} + 1 of sky or creature unless we want to like throw a really scummy outside slot in the +1

In post 4282, RadiantCowbells wrote:but in that case why did we blow coalition in the first place?

In post 4283, Ankamius wrote:yes I am

and I also strongly believe that we'd get a lot more mileage out of flipping the consensus scumreads than by doing whatever the hell we're trying to do now to sort the coalition

since

you know

we've essentially stagnated with the same reads for weeks at this point and you're advocating for us not to progress our reads at all?

I totally don’t get what you’re thinking here, Ank. We know there’s at least one scum in the coalition, so a veto with no one it, is beyond pointless.

have i mentioned i thought that dannflor was deepwolfing

Not shocked by that RC col
it's gonna fail but ayyyy I'll vote it just to prove a point

In post 4287, Ankamius wrote:whatever RC

you're more important than everyone else in the game and that's all that matters

In post 4289, RadiantCowbells wrote:sorry like you guys had your coalition, it failed
now I want to have a shot at ending this game so no one else has to deal with this shitshow anymore and I'm being selfish?
I had 0 input on the previous coalition. that was the agreement. you didn't even exclude me like I asked. a shit coalition got passed and we're not even going to veto in it?

In post 4290, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Veto

PLEASE veto me

@Ank, wtf are you doing? RC isn’t responsible for coalition fail. He had nothing whatsoever to do with it. How has he controlled anything?

In post 4342, MariaR wrote:Not shocked by that RC col
it's gonna fail but ayyyy I'll vote it just to prove a point

??

that's not my coalition

that's my ranking of the players in the previous coalition

In post 4293, Ankamius wrote:like

wow

four townreads get vetoed

two townreads die

that sure does a lot for my reads!

At least one has to be from coalition or it’s pointless, do you seriously disagree with this?

In post 4294, RadiantCowbells wrote:i didn't even want the dance, i just wanted to go straight into coalition. everyone insisted on narrowing the pool first and dance was better than blowing veto or venge

because I've been stuck in the same rut for like 3 weeks now and you're literally advocating for a play that will do nothing but kill two of my townreads

what exactly is the benefit of that fmpov

you

already

know

your

townreads

are

wrong

Can we do 2nd coalition today?

no we can't because tmck decided he didn't want to give me my coalition

In post 4295, Ankamius wrote:I know that AT LEAST ONE of my townreads are wrong

FOR ALL I KNOW IT IS EXACTLY ONE

AND IT'S ONE OF THE TWO SLOTS I'M BARELY TOWNREADING IN THE FIRST PLACE

PUT THOSE TWO IN AND TWO BIGGER TOWNREADS AND THE TWO BIGGER TOWNREADS DIE

THEN WHAT

In post 4296, RadiantCowbells wrote:if we haven't found the scum in the coalition by midgame i'm going to end up lynched or revealed on paranoia. that's not happening.

cleaning up your collective mess is priority #1 here.

We put in 1 or 2 tops obviously. I think Chemist needs to be in veto. Maybe Chem/Clem? Eventhough mechanics may implicate Creature, I feel pretty good about him being town.

In post 4342, MariaR wrote:Not shocked by that RC col
it's gonna fail but ayyyy I'll vote it just to prove a point

That's because it's his reads plus a veto