Mafiascum.net

In post 4319, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 4315, Bitmap wrote:Can we just lynch Sherlock?

I would say with 90% confidence that Makaito spewed them clear

My thoughts exactly.

Actually. I’m not sure I want to kill Bitmap. We can use them to target SW if Bitmap is town. This plan is only foiled if both are scum.

But I think we are thinking about the neighborizers and Ali all wrong. Ali only revealed that Aaron and Chemist were in a hood. If Ali is scum with any of the three, Ali knows this reveals RR as a neighborizer, which doesn’t seem super beneficial to RRscum.

So I think the think we need to analyze whether Aaron or Chemist are scum. I think what we have here is a Tracker/Rolecop, Tracker/Follower, or a Watcher/Voyeur, Watcher/Rolecop combo.

Would a role like that really exist?

In post 4324, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 4318, Chemist1422 wrote:that being said why are people (myself included really) assuming there's a vig

p-edit: thanks titus

Because we want people dead.

I suspect something other than a vig that gets false positives on a gunsmith.

Wtf gobble why the 180?

tbh lynching aaron is the best

titus needs to lift the veto

In post 4326, gobbledygook wrote:Would a role like that really exist?

It could be spread into two roles.

In post 4329, OkaPoka wrote:tbh lynching aaron is the best

titus needs to lift the veto

I'll think about it but I am strongly against it.

Let me know when I’m gonna die. Trying to hit up my weed dealer so I can go home.

I support lifting the veto.

bitmap you didn't even want to lynch aaronfrost

In post 4328, Bitmap wrote:Wtf gobble why the 180?

What 180?

In post 4333, Bitmap wrote:I support lifting the veto.

Nope. I can't let my mason get close to a lynch.

titus nobody is being pranked lets be honest lets lynch the objectively second scummiest player

In post 4334, OkaPoka wrote:bitmap you didn't even want to lynch aaronfrost

I’ll support it now

In post 4335, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 4328, Bitmap wrote:Wtf gobble why the 180?

What 180?

I thought you wanted me dead.

In post 4338, Bitmap wrote:

In post 4334, OkaPoka wrote:bitmap you didn't even want to lynch aaronfrost

I’ll support it now

smh thats an okapoka survivalist play

In post 4337, OkaPoka wrote:titus nobody is being pranked lets be honest lets lynch the objectively second scummiest player

So SW?

In post 4339, Bitmap wrote:

In post 4335, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 4328, Bitmap wrote:Wtf gobble why the 180?

What 180?

I thought you wanted me dead.

I do. And I explained in that post why I might want you dead.

Why I might not want you dead*

In post 4341, Titus wrote:

In post 4337, OkaPoka wrote:titus nobody is being pranked lets be honest lets lynch the objectively second scummiest player

So SW?

literally every case on sw is not convincing

In post 4340, OkaPoka wrote:

In post 4338, Bitmap wrote:

In post 4334, OkaPoka wrote:bitmap you didn't even want to lynch aaronfrost

I’ll support it now

smh thats an okapoka survivalist play

I learned from your town play in Baton Pass when you clinged onto RC for your dear life.

In post 4344, OkaPoka wrote:

In post 4341, Titus wrote:

In post 4337, OkaPoka wrote:titus nobody is being pranked lets be honest lets lynch the objectively second scummiest player

So SW?

literally every case on sw is not convincing

Great. Then who do you want dead that's not you, Aaron, Hectic, Gobble, Chemist, RR, Amrun or Flavor Leaf?

In post 4345, Bitmap wrote:

In post 4340, OkaPoka wrote:

In post 4338, Bitmap wrote:

In post 4334, OkaPoka wrote:bitmap you didn't even want to lynch aaronfrost

I’ll support it now

smh thats an okapoka survivalist play

I learned from your town play in Baton Pass when you clinged onto RC for your dear life.

stop it nephew

Or TSE

Or Espy