Page 175 of 333

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:14 pm
by Bell
Q: what about april’s response is scum indicative for him?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:15 pm
by Something_Smart
It has been a while since I played with scumblade

But this sure doesn't feel like it

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:16 pm
by Bell
Also, I don’t think S_S and I debugging is going to work.

Also, would it be strange to ask for some sort of partial mass claim where we just ask who the regular town are?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:17 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4352, Bell wrote:Also, I don’t think S_S and I debugging is going to work.

Also, would it be strange to ask for some sort of partial mass claim where we just ask who the regular town are?
This would be a bad idea.

Anyone who is 3P would have claimed such.

A mass claim of sorts just invites idiotic ness.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:24 pm
by Bell
Bummer. Forget I asked.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:25 pm
by Titus
I agree with MathBlade. No massclaim.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:26 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4354, Bell wrote:Bummer. Forget I asked.
Forgotten :)

Besides pretty sure I am aware who is in A50’s hood anyway and my reads come from that too.

A50 and Super Bowl don’t want to share anyway and we all know how asking goes

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:26 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4355, Titus wrote:I agree with MathBlade. No massclaim.
Yay we agree on something.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:26 pm
by Bell
Something something the siiblings finally agree on something sitcom laugh track.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:30 pm
by superbowl9
Our town wincons are the same i presume, which are we win when we eliminate all threats to town

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:31 pm
by superbowl9
Pretty sure i know who the cop is but they just don’t wanna share for some reason! Oops did i narrow POE? Silly me haha

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:32 pm
by Bell
In post 4359, superbowl9 wrote:Our town wincons are the same i presume, which are we win when we eliminate all threats to town
You know, I missed that in my initial role pm. Maybe if i’d looked at it harder, I’d have realized we were in multi ball sooner.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:34 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4361, Bell wrote:
In post 4359, superbowl9 wrote:Our town wincons are the same i presume, which are we win when we eliminate all threats to town
You know, I missed that in my initial role pm. Maybe if i’d looked at it harder, I’d have realized we were in multi ball sooner.
Exactly.

This is why one of the 3P pairings is scum and Titus Mastina and Nero are full of shit.

I have been trying to figure out this multiball all game
To be told over and over it’s singleball.

Pissed me off that does

Almost like it’s a mechanical response or something.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:35 pm
by Bell
I mean, we’ll find out as the nights progress won’t we?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:36 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4363, Bell wrote:I mean, we’ll find out as the nights progress won’t we?
My role PM says multiball
Threats plural

Why do I need more nights to find that out?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:38 pm
by Bell
I actually directly asked schadd if the game was multi ball when gamma flipped and he said he wouldn’t answer that.

Threats can mean multiple mafia or multiple factions. The yellow alien flip is a big clue tho.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:40 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4365, Bell wrote:I actually directly asked schadd if the game was multi ball when gamma flipped and he said he wouldn’t answer that.

Threats can mean multiple mafia or multiple factions. The yellow alien flip is a big clue tho.
The fact we don’t get flips with wincons is the biggest clue.

Look at how informed Titus Mastina and Nero claim to be.

Just let it sink in.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:40 pm
by Something_Smart
In post 4364, MathBlade wrote:Threats plural
The threats to the town include scum member #1, scum member #2, etc. All of those are separate threats.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:41 pm
by Chemist1422
In post 4312, Titus wrote:
In post 4311, MathBlade wrote:
In post 4310, Titus wrote:
In post 4307, Nero Cain wrote:TPG maybe
Pickaxe and Chemist imo
This is literally execute all lurkers
It's not but scum have every incentive to lurk here and pray for implosion. Chemist has a strong negative reaction.

He posts a small but effective April case and then he throws her a softball so he can get off the wagon.

Pete's a VCA and lurker lynch.
she not he

and my read on april hasn't really changed but the wagon's close to hammer so i dont want to move back yet

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:42 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4367, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 4364, MathBlade wrote:Threats plural
The threats to the town include scum member #1, scum member #2, etc. All of those are separate threats.
Is that something that changed while I was in retirement?

Used to be something like “You win when all the scum are dead” iirc

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:45 pm
by superbowl9
In post 4364, MathBlade wrote:
In post 4363, Bell wrote:I mean, we’ll find out as the nights progress won’t we?
My role PM says multiball
Threats plural

Why do I need more nights to find that out?
Yes but scum are 3p in this so

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:46 pm
by superbowl9
Oops wrong quote meant to do your most recent

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:47 pm
by MathBlade
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=5548

Yeah it is a change grabbed a super old newbie to check.

Can you clarify what you mean by that superbowl?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:53 pm
by MathBlade
In post 4370, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 4364, MathBlade wrote:
In post 4363, Bell wrote:I mean, we’ll find out as the nights progress won’t we?
My role PM says multiball
Threats plural

Why do I need more nights to find that out?
Yes but scum are 3p in this so
The last sentence please.

Seems like you’re agreeing with one of my theories the Army is 3P.

You’ve been against this. Seems off.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:04 pm
by Something_Smart
In post 4369, MathBlade wrote:Used to be something like “You win when all the scum are dead” iirc
I mean I think it depends on the game. This game clearly has third party shenanigans and so schadd was understandably dodgy about the wincon.

It's possible to have just one anti-town group even despite that wincon. I once ran a game that was singleball but was deliberately presented in a way that made it look like it could be multiball or have a hostile third party.