Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:12 pm
I'm still looking for the amendment. Why can't he be obnoxious about his crumbing like a certain other player?
Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.
OuchIn post 4350, Brian Skies wrote:I'm still looking for the amendment. Why can't he be obnoxious about his crumbing like a certain other player?
Crumb?In post 4204, Bell wrote:That’s very even handed Brian.In post 4198, Brian Skies wrote:Eh? Those readslists were responses to different posts. The second one probably took me about 20 minutes, give or take. I appreciate the defense, but iso'ing without context will burn you.In post 4154, Hench Princesses wrote:Actually fuck, look at the time between 3519 to 3648. The dude was thinking about his reads in forward for 3 hours
-E
What's a normal Brian pattern?
Not really. I kinda crumbed a it’s “because it’s me that i’m Paranoid of you” thing.In post 4354, Brian Skies wrote:Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.
In post 4211, Bell wrote:I mean, have I said or done anything without explaining myself to some degree or other?Pre and post actionor thought process?
@deacon yes, my tone is off. Hopefully that sends the right alarm bells ringing and not the vague fence sitty ones you’re currently emitting.
Why do you think they'd need explanations for your doc action failing if you don't think you crumbed that roleBell wrote:But that was the only intentional crumb.
Why would you crumb this?In post 4357, Bell wrote:Not really. I kinda crumbed a it’s “because it’s me that i’m Paranoid of you” thing.In post 4354, Brian Skies wrote:Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.
nevermind, you were talking to brian. so 4211 wasn't a crumb either then?In post 4360, Dunnstral wrote:Why do you think they'd need explanations for your doc action failing if you don't think you crumbed that roleBell wrote:But that was the only intentional crumb.
Because if I died I thought you guys might see it and see where I was coming from.In post 4361, Brian Skies wrote:Why would you crumb this?In post 4357, Bell wrote:Not really. I kinda crumbed a it’s “because it’s me that i’m Paranoid of you” thing.In post 4354, Brian Skies wrote:Is this supposed to be a crumb?In post 4145, Bell wrote:That’s paranoid town bell tho.
I’m never sure if i’m Being taken for a ride from high efforting what do you mean i’m Being paranoid of you but not Annie what kind of double standard is this you ask? It’s my double standard.
This one.In post 4272, Bell wrote:I just can’t solve as scum.
Like at all.
I don’t put on a shit eating grin and laugh like i’m BM when i’m Scum this game.
Like just iso me. It’s long but there’s a lot of consistently and readily available explanation for any thought process I may have whether I say it then or later, it still gets said eventually
*i’m a LOT* more vague as scum
And also, I can barely talk to my scum partners but i’ve Evenly distributed my interactions with players for the most part, or at least haven’t avoided anyone.
Uh, just a whole lotta reasons i’m Not scum this game.
Yeah.In post 4365, Brian Skies wrote:This one.In post 4272, Bell wrote:I just can’t solve as scum.
Like at all.
I don’t put on a shit eating grin and laugh like i’m BM when i’m Scum this game.
Like just iso me. It’s long but there’s a lot of consistently and readily available explanation for any thought process I may have whether I say it then or later, it still gets said eventually
*i’m a LOT* more vague as scum
And also, I can barely talk to my scum partners but i’ve Evenly distributed my interactions with players for the most part, or at least haven’t avoided anyone.
Uh, just a whole lotta reasons i’m Not scum this game.
Hmm? Reword?In post 4360, Dunnstral wrote:Why do you think they'd need explanations for your doc action failing if you don't think you crumbed that roleBell wrote:But that was the only intentional crumb.
Explain. -_-
In post 4257, Bell wrote:My thought process in that post was simply that I wanted to dismantle their associations because i’m Alone this game.
This is a wild conspiracy theory I had:In post 4289, Bell wrote:Huh, I dunno what to say to the i’m Alone over here narrative and yeah, i’m Not going to be able to interact with everyone all the time. I’d say i’m One of the broader interacted though, and the people i’vecjosen To interact with for the most part make sense from my perspective.
@dunstrall, I feel i’ve Solved and showed solving sufficiently enough that this isn’t true. Like, i’m Not going crazy, but i’m Not *not* solving either. It’s there.