Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2020 4:03 pm
Probably wrong.In post 4347, skitter30 wrote:Hot take: i think there's more scum over there than over here
(Or at the very least the scum:town ratio is loads higher over there)
Probably wrong.In post 4347, skitter30 wrote:Hot take: i think there's more scum over there than over here
(Or at the very least the scum:town ratio is loads higher over there)
Every time I look over there I see something from Bell that would wake me up out of a sound sleep and send me to a keyboard if I were in that thread.In post 4339, Dandelion Wine wrote:I mean the fact that I was in the purple room is out now, anyways...
We might as well take advantage of that.
Other thread might need to have peta-midway intervention with Bell.
that's not a bad point considering that they made 4164 not long afterIn post 4340, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:It can also be for free credit and a place to hunker down.
I see opportunism in the "hey here's a free reason to vote someone who will never die with a decent defense as to why I am doing it let me settle here and not worry about it too much".
I think u lost ur imagination somewhere along the way thenIn post 4353, skitter30 wrote:I dont think i can
I said when IIn post 4346, Firebringer wrote:U were just talking about when u flip like 3 posts ago.In post 4344, Deacon Blues wrote:This is a straight up misrep. I was pissed initially because I read LLD's dayvig post as targeting us. When I realized she was targeting Dandelion, THAT's when I lost it. Had nothing to do with a vote.In post 4331, Firebringer wrote:Deacon has a meltdown over one vote.In post 4326, SirCakez wrote:Deacon Blues (1) - superbowl9, Petapan, GFITAC, Deacon Blues, Dandelion Wine, midwaybear, Something_Smart, Firebringer, skitter30, PookyTheMagicalBear, Pisskop
i'm ok w/ it, especially if civilized!thread can't figure out who to go forIn post 4357, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want to turnstile Pooky and yeet Gamma.
Is that a reasonable action? assumign the other thread will yeet pooky
it's day 2, i think this is a good policy. we don't need to focus on mod mindgames right now.In post 4321, Deacon Blues wrote:I know that and I don't know how to make any progression on this so I'm kinda just filing it off to the sideIn post 4319, skitter30 wrote:It's unfortunate that you think that abt my role, but that is indeed what it is, and there's not much i can really do or say abt balance concerns.
-b
In post 3227, Dunnstral wrote:In post 4316, Deacon Blues wrote:@LLD
{skitter, pooky, gamma, midway bear}
w/o getting into other thread
Let's start w/ these:
I think pooky is scum for reasons that i went into earlier today; I still pretty much think that.
I went into today thinking skitter was scum - I don't like just her role even existing and I am townreading people that might be foils to that role, but honestly every time I interact w/ her she ends up changing my mind (e.g initially I thought 4209 seemed overly simplified and flat but I think she explained the thought process pretty well; I think w/o being a full blown watcher I'd probably be townreading skitter pretty hard
ffery thinks gamma is scum, and I did early on but I'm kinda lost, I think some posts like 4178 seem like pretty proper town paranoia to me
what about peta? he's seemed pretty good overall and I was kind of taken by surprise by HP's indictment of them in the other thread.
midway has seemed town to me mostly until his jump on FL, but I think the way he is engaging you on us seems town to me
Let's start here and I realize these are kinda some broad strokes; I'm trying to reassess/reread some stuff in the meantime
-bMy thoughts:
The only reason to push skitter is not liking her role, wheras pooky is based on play, correct?
We don't have all the info on the setup right now, so in my opinion we should be going after Pooky. As a side note, if Skitter is by chance not scum then she is a strong town power role. I'm not saying don't lim her just for that, but when there's multiple scumspects anyway there's a point to be had there. Also, the by play read is stronger than the mechanical/role read
Dunnstral obviously doesn't speak for the entire thread. we should watch for how these posts are received by our counterparts.In post 3229, Dunnstral wrote:In post 4359, Deacon Blues wrote:i'm ok w/ it, especially if civilized!thread can't figure out who to go forIn post 4357, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want to turnstile Pooky and yeet Gamma.
Is that a reasonable action? assumign the other thread will yeet pooky
I also subscribe to the idea that trying to rid one thread entirely of scum is akin to trying to win a mini w/ only partial flip information and would prefer we do things that have a higher floor in value (I'm in the minority of purple room occupants w/ that opinion; Nacho in particular wanted to try to rid forward of scum, i just think that's a mechanic that has a crappy feedback mechanism to how close you are
-bI sort of agree with just going for who we think is scum, but still think we should try to go for the sweep. The catch here is I think it's ok to elim from our group right now, there's certainly scum over here.
That would mean you guys elim pooky, we elim someone and send someone else over
The downside is that we can't elim two people from your thread, I guess. Personally, I think it's scummy or at least escapist from both sides to be saying that most of the scum is in the other thread
In post 3229, Dunnstral wrote:I sort of agree with just going for who we think is scum, but still think we should try to go for the sweep. The catch here is I think it's ok to elim from our group right now, there's certainly scum over here.
That would mean you guys elim pooky, we elim someone and send someone else over
The downside is that we can't elim two people from your thread, I guess. Personally, I think it's scummy or at least escapist from both sides to be saying that most of the scum is in the other thread
In post 4364, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 3229, Dunnstral wrote:I sort of agree with just going for who we think is scum, but still think we should try to go for the sweep. The catch here is I think it's ok to elim from our group right now, there's certainly scum over here.
That would mean you guys elim pooky, we elim someone and send someone else over
The downside is that we can't elim two people from your thread, I guess. Personally, I think it's scummy or at least escapist from both sides to be saying that most of the scum is in the other threadwho are you scum reading atm? just did a quick ISO and I don't see an obvious answer to that
-b
The issue is if we try this scum can manipulate it to create a wildly advantageous gamestateIn post 4239, Deacon Blues wrote:Even so, it's a goal we can try for. We have 2 more chances to clear that timestream today.In post 4234, superbowl9 wrote:I highly doubt we achieve this goalIn post 4231, Deacon Blues wrote:Because it introduces the possibiity of sending scum to the timestream we've been trying to purge scum from.In post 4210, superbowl9 wrote:Why are we not turnstyling anyone again?
you don't need to get turnstiled today if you're going to purple roomIn post 4367, superbowl9 wrote:Purple Room - I'm fine with being the purple room today, but if I'm also getting turnstyled we may need to reconsider this plan. I think this also makes the turnstyle skittle plan more appealing, since it makes our purple room choice simple.
i agree with this actually; i mostly just want to turnstyle PR claims at this point (yes i know skitter, i'm late to that party) and I'm kinda willing to just throw everything else out the window to get at that at this point; ffery probably doesn't agree but that's how i personally feelIn post 4367, superbowl9 wrote:we should at least send the slot over so we can potentially get something useful out of this. We need to make a decision now: turnstyle or elim.
In post 3230, Dunnstral wrote:This is an awkward question for me to answer right now
Yeah I think this is a bad idea. If we have to send a PR claim today, I'd rather it were superbowl, even though I think sending him to the purple room will work out better for both timestreams.In post 3234, Annie Edison wrote:@bork pls don’t send skitter tia