Mafiascum.net

In post 4238, Nero Cain wrote:I'll read tictac in a min but he's not on the team with butterchurn on it.

oh I did say that. lol I just assumed that Butters's vote on tictac was an anti associtive.

In post 4345, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 4344, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4337, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 4320, Nero Cain wrote:tictac is prob the days wagon and at 170 pages this day shouldn't go on much longer but wanted to put my vote on scum for the time being.

VOTE: butterchurn

Why don't you think butter and tictac can be scum together?

not sure if I ever said that. Nice lil' manipulative post.

that's Titus's stance, not yours.

I was asking Nero a question...not stating his stance

In post 4348, Nashville Dreams wrote:That being said, I'm willing to wait a day or two on lurkers. Even in that one game, we had two days of data to work with.

~Titus

kinda gross to give people not engaging the game a pass while only putting people on the table who are actually trying on day 1.

i hate this kind of mindset.


in epicmafia community we plow through scummmy lurkers d1/d2 and hit scum always

In post 4293, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm starting to feel like Nero's just right and tictac is town.

Is this wrong Nero?

In post 4142, The Keeper wrote:

In post 4129, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 1016, The Keeper wrote:

In post 904, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 898, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 895, Menalque wrote:hey, std, how would you feel about joining me on bnuuy?

sure

VOTE: bnunnnunnnunnunnunny

The winds of change. They are blowing.
VOTE: Bnuuy

The black winds howl.
One amongst you will shortly perish.

Chainsaw bnuuy

On what B453M3N7 level are you on for this to be a chainsaw?

Quote fixing my last post...

In post 4351, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 4345, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 4344, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4337, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 4320, Nero Cain wrote:tictac is prob the days wagon and at 170 pages this day shouldn't go on much longer but wanted to put my vote on scum for the time being.

VOTE: butterchurn

Why don't you think butter and tictac can be scum together?

not sure if I ever said that. Nice lil' manipulative post.

that's Titus's stance, not yours.

I was asking Nero a question...not stating his stance

Yes, he read it like you were saying that was his stance, and I saw the misread, so was explaining that your stance was they are together, not you saying that he had said that they cant be scum together

In post 4353, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 4293, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm starting to feel like Nero's just right and tictac is town.

Is this wrong Nero?

oh, i misread the misread.

why even try as town when people are going to give you a pass on day 1 and you can prevent your miselimination 100% rather than have to potentially fight for it amirite.

just give low-mid posters free pass forever!!

In post 4352, SCP 682 wrote:

In post 4348, Nashville Dreams wrote:That being said, I'm willing to wait a day or two on lurkers. Even in that one game, we had two days of data to work with.

~Titus

kinda gross to give people not engaging the game a pass while only putting people on the table who are actually trying on day 1.

i hate this kind of mindset.


in epicmafia community we plow through scummmy lurkers d1/d2 and hit scum always

I agree with that. I am of the mindset the scummiest goes, lurker or not. I hate non-poster non-voters. That's why I'm even on tictac. His vote is a non entity. That's like half the game though.

~Titus

In post 4154, SCP 682 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 4153, DkKoba wrote:

In post 105, tictac wrote:

In post 57, GuiltyLion wrote:I get townvibes from this and would like to know if anyone disagrees

I disagree

In post 110, tictac wrote:

In post 67, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i'm claiming that i'm not in any hood

why tho?

In post 114, tictac wrote:

In post 72, humaneatingmonkey wrote:marcistar is so kawaii

In post 73, humaneatingmonkey wrote:that's a valid read into the game

:up:

In post 120, tictac wrote:

In post 79, humaneatingmonkey wrote:idk if koba is town. i dont know if a rapid show of gamesolving to get townread early is outside of their scum range. i also think that the way they went so hot on Dwlee on a poor reaction test makes me think it's fabricated so they can have somewhere to push.

yeah. it's null
same w lion

In post 127, tictac wrote:

In post 106, humaneatingmonkey wrote:hectic what do you think of koba

why do folks think i'm hectic?
no opinion yet

In post 131, tictac wrote:why can't they be town using forced reads?

In post 135, tictac wrote:

In post 132, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why would they have to? if scum and it's within their reportoire, they already took that shot in dwlee. i'm not sure there was any development in that read thus far — so why would they do another forced read and vote me?

only town would have to, maybe

ebwop :P

tho actually they do it cause it's what they do as town (as both align)

these are literally posts from a mini normal tictac was last in as town btw

these are within their first TEN posts.


this is clear towny solve energy.

this is absent this game.

ope forgot to switch accounts

ngl i do not see as big a difference here as you seem to

In post 4281, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really get why tic tac is scum instead of a mildly useless town.

yeh

----

Agree w/ butterchurn that toogeloo is the scummiest lurker, if we want to do a lurker push that one i could maybe get behind. but pushing lurkers is an easy way for scum to get miseliminations because the lurkers probably won't push back very much. and having the bnuuy wagon get derailed for the second time with a sudden lurker push is really not sitting right with me.

especially people 'not being as engaged as they were in other games/being more focused on what people said to/about them' when the game is One Hundred and Seventy-Five Pages Long On Day One does Not seem like a super clear scum tell to me

catboi is the scummiest

i think toogeloo is the towniest lurker...ugh

In post 4358, Nashville Dreams wrote:

In post 4352, SCP 682 wrote:

In post 4348, Nashville Dreams wrote:That being said, I'm willing to wait a day or two on lurkers. Even in that one game, we had two days of data to work with.

~Titus

kinda gross to give people not engaging the game a pass while only putting people on the table who are actually trying on day 1.

i hate this kind of mindset.


in epicmafia community we plow through scummmy lurkers d1/d2 and hit scum always

I agree with that. I am of the mindset the scummiest goes, lurker or not. I hate non-poster non-voters. That's why I'm even on tictac. His vote is a non entity. That's like half the game though.

~Titus

Explains the "one fucking vote" comment...
You literally can't VCA me for it..

Anyway...

Nero, do you think butterchurn and tictac can be scum together?

~Titus

i'd lim my mother just to end the day at this point

PUSHING LURKERS

PUTS PRESSURE ON THEM

AND THEN THAT PRESSURE

MAKES THEM ALIGNMENT TELL MORE


so if u think they're null!! STOP RESISTING IT

In post 4352, SCP 682 wrote:in epicmafia community we plow through scummmy lurkers d1/d2 and hit scum always

I mean, there's going to be mostly lurking scum in games here too but players like toog, tic tac etc. are just going to be mainly inactive regardless of alignment. Plowing through lurkers will net some scum true but it's also going to catch plenty of town.

In post 4364, Save The Dragons wrote:i'd lim my mother just to end the day at this point

"You just summoned your mom!" - Yuma

i don't know what that means but i lol'd anyway

In post 4366, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4352, SCP 682 wrote:in epicmafia community we plow through scummmy lurkers d1/d2 and hit scum always

I mean, there's going to be mostly lurking scum in games here too but players like toog, tic tac etc. are just going to be mainly inactive regardless of alignment. Plowing through lurkers will net some scum true but it's also going to catch plenty of town.

i.
do.
not.
scum.
read.
them.
for.
lurking.

stop.
using.
their.
lurk.
status.
to.
shield.
them.

i LITERALLY townread enchant like holy shit.

you got SCP so riled that you shed them of their alt

In post 4367, Sword of Ducks wrote:

In post 4364, Save The Dragons wrote:i'd lim my mother just to end the day at this point

"You just summoned your mom!" - Yuma

I just heard the largest wagon is StD's mom.

@scp, why townread Enchant?

In post 4244, SCP 682 wrote:ok look

from the first run of this setup concept

if you think someone is malefactor - the play is to ignore them - not eliminate. (until we are ahead then its ok to do so but even so)

lukewarm i believe pretty much botched their miller fakeclaim in that game and we just ignored that slot (or whoever was the malefactor.

also like jokes exist

Lukewarm was town

It was Wheme

In post 2410, catboi wrote:The claim means we're not fading FL day 1 because he's <rand scum (but he's totally a mafia monk).

Anyway

VOTE: tictac

Let me try here for a moment. See how the wagons form.

Here is my case, comprised solely of information instead of analysis: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go

after Nashville wagon got steam, Catboi pushed Tictac here trying to see if they could "form dueling wagons" as said in a later post.

I do believe it could be a distancing tactic by Catboi since they scum read Nashville, and then later joined.


However, Catboi seems like they would vote Tictac, so I think I'm cool with TicTac vote, and make them commit to voting a possible partner here.