Mafiascum.net

In post 4256, Grendel wrote:

In post 4225, Almost50 wrote:

In post 4218, DrippingGoofball wrote:A50 you're not voting. Be a pal. We need Iecerint's fake claim. We are running out of time.

Do you want my

HONEST

opinion? We are ALL scum in this game (and that includes me). Some of us aren't reading anymore *raises hand* and some are hopping on each and every wagon that remotely looks like taking off, making it damn too hard to draw any associative tells either way. Regardless of who gets shredded; I feel like anyone ON the wagon could be scum (bussing or pushing a miselim, depending on the flip), and anyone OFF it could still be scum (avoiding a p's wagon or distancing from a miselim). It is sad that that's how it feels on D3, but seriously.. I fon't know why wagons form or dissipate in this game anymore, and everyone's shouting a different set of names to be shredded.

I think that this can be savlagable working backwards with TRs. Figure out who your trusts are and bloc with them.

anycase I can say im pretty disappointed reading through your iso. I recall you being a much more apt player back in 2016. You dont seem like you've been trying v hard despite the sheer volume of your posts this game. Perhaps I confused you with another player? idk

@Grendel: No. You're probably talking about me indeed. I do tend to be more solvey when I do have a bloody idea of what's going on. I mean, whether I'm wrong or right is another matter, but I -at least- would have an idea.

Right now it's like:

A: Let's eliminate B or C
B: No. Let's do E
C: (@A) why do you SR B?
A: (@C) why do you TR them?
D: "it looks like" E is LHF, Let's shred someone else
E: B is Scum
F: I can do anyone NOT listed above

And then if you ISO any of them you'd find they've voted at least half of the roster already, changed their minds a couple of times, and have no explanation for their reads other than "gut"

THIS game state confuses me and demotivates me. or should I say confuses me and demotivates me, and in a Large that's almost unsalvageable. (Is that a word?)

Even when I did eventually decide to make a stance and declare intent on Ice to force a claim; someone unvoted!!

In post 4260, Grendel wrote: you see town motivations in lavender? Where

In post 4261, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you see scum motivations in lavender?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I rest my case!

In post 4265, Grendel wrote:Shes really like this every game? :/

I can confirm this to be true

In post 4279, Doctor Drew wrote:I have been playing drunk before any of you even played a game of mafia.

Would have been funnier if you said it was before any of them was old enough to drink.

In post 4282, Lavender wrote:A handful probably of people I’ve played with?
Drew
A50
DGB
Pooky
Iecrint
BJay
Galron
chk
pkop
Gamma...

Uhhh
Eheh this isn’t a handful~ ☆〜（ゝ。∂）

It is, considering you have 2 hands.

In post 4286, Lavender wrote:Bad bad bad guys
Chanting the magic spell
Pointer points to....

A50, the problems you’re having are the exact reason I liked Grendel’s exercise he attempted earlier

I think mostly you have group A that doesn't want to eliminate a power role and group B that doesn't want to eliminate a vanilla role and group C who doesn't care as long as it's not them.

In post 4374, Galron wrote:

In post 4357, NoPowerOverMe wrote:All the more reason to eliminate DGB today.

If I get vigged please eliminate DGB tomorrow.

How the hell are we going to know if you were vigged? It really feels like you're holding out something we should know or just scum at this point.

Obviously if DGB claims a kill on me you would know it was her most likely.

In post 4332, a2rudeboy wrote:At this point, Scum DGB (Iec, Grendel) is more useful than Town Lav/NPOM

In post 4375, Almost50 wrote:THIS game state confuses me and demotivates me. or should I say confuses me and

thus

demotivates me, and in a Large that's almost unsalvageable. (Is that a word?)

Even when I did eventually decide to make a stance and declare intent on Ice to force a claim; someone unvoted!!

So, let's make the game state simpler, particularly since we're at <48 hours.

1. Do you think DGB and me is town v town?
2A. If so, explain why you think DGB and me are town. Give exactly 1 preferred shred candidate.
2B. If not, who of DGB/Iec do you think is more likely scum?

In post 4385, Iecerint wrote:1. Do you think DGB and me is town v town?
2A. If so, explain why you think DGB and me are town. Give exactly 1 preferred shred candidate.
2B. If not, who of DGB/Iec do you think is more likely scum?

Dude!

1- . If I had an opinion on this I would have declared it loud and clear. I can confidently say it's not SvS though.
2A. DGB explained something to me (that not all her SRs are actually SRs, and that some were sarcasm/angry ma,e calling rather than actual reads). As for you, I -generally- have no read either way, but the Town-lean I have is due to this being awful play if you are Scum, and I think you are a better player than that. (So both of you are Town LEANS, but not Town READS)
2B. dave said it best. IF there's manipulation going on it would be more likely from DGB. I don't think that's the case though. It more like "a theory that IF such manipulation does exist.."

Rude's Player A is more useful than Player B is more useful than player C feels like appeal to authority.

Town can 100% be manipulative btw

We no longer have time for anything else.

VOTE: Iecerint

bah.

Given the amount of resistance to the wagon i wouldnt be surprised if it did flip scum.... except I dont sr ice especially hard.

L-?

Shred-2 unless mine isn't the only re-vote after the VC.

VOTE: ice

i mean.

I wont pretend to have read the last several pages, but I feel like we flopped off of a good track to a compromise.

Confirmed Shred-1.

CLAIM FUCKING INTENT BEFORE HAMMER.

In post 4394, chkflip wrote:Confirmed Shred-1.

CLAIM FUCKING INTENT BEFORE HAMMER.

We have one and a half days left right?

OK.

I'm a Vanilla Shredder/VT.

Flavor is that I'm Josh Elmore, guitarist for a band called Cattle Decapitation.

DGB/drew/death/rude is a better shred.