Idk if you know this but I made a post a post that does what you're asking for.
In post 4415, Save The Dragons wrote:i see one in your post and it's because i changed my mind between post 560 and post 3172 because new information came to light
You mean like Ircher's red flip? Lol. You kept saying even after he flipped that you expected him to be town.
In post 4416, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't understand how you can't be bussing both days for your other "lie" i told
like? just because tet doesn't think it's scum theatre doesn't mean that it's not?
You're doing that thing again where you're moving the goal posts instead of just admitting you're wrong. You went from "you ignored each other" to "well you ignored each other at first and then bussed him at the last second" to "idk why you can't be bussing him both days". Like you're blatantly just trying to fit the pieces together to frame my actions as scummy. I'm scum if I didn't bus and I'm scum if I did. I'm scum if Ircher flips green and I'm scum if he flips red. You aren't trying to read me.
STD you realize saying "just because Tet said so doesn't mean they were correct" also applies to you, right? You can't come up with a solid consistent reason for why I'm scum and it's gotten to the point where you're essentially just saying "just trust me" as if that's supposed to mean anything. Why are you more trustworthy than conftown who literally gave you evidence that you ignored?
Furthermore, both NK targets town read me and defended me, and also scum read you. Why do you think that I kill them but leave you alive? Why do I kill the people on my side and leave the people who are against me alive? Because that's not even WIFOM, that would just be objectively bad play.