Mafiascum.net

@CHK, my current theory is that at least 1/3 of you/NPOM/Pook is scum, and it REALLY doesn't make sense for me to vote on a wagon that the three of you start like that give that theory.

How many of DGB drew rude is scum?

I'm not. It's just unnecessary is all.

Goofball isn't Trump just like I wasn't Trump. The analogy doesn't play because it's like calling a Republican Hitler. It's weak and stupid. Now, is Goofball being abrasive? Sure. Are they whining because their day-long preferred wagon is dwindling? Yes.

Neither makes them Trump.

Stop.

Try these if you’re genuinely interested in talking US politics

Stop bringing it into my mafia game tho
Godwin’s Law Nouveau isn’t something I like engaging in

In post 4425, TiphaineDeath wrote:@CHK, my current theory is that at least 1/3 of you/NPOM/Pook is scum, and it REALLY doesn't make sense for me to vote on a wagon that the three of you start like that give that theory.

Well, we sure as shit aren't voting dave out today, so the moment you stop vanity wagoning is the moment I'll take you a little more seriously. Respect for standing up for something, though, and you'll have to remind me to pick this back up D4. I'd be interested in hearing your theory.

The poinlol if I must.

Sorry ignore the first part I was going to over explain something that didn't need explaining.

I think this is correct?

a2rudeboy (5): chkflip, NPOM, Pooky, Galron, Gamma
Iecerint (5): DrippingGoofball, Doctor Drew, davesaz, pisskop, BrightEyedFish
DrippingGoofball (2): Iecerint, Bambi Jay
TiphaineDeath (2): Starbuck, Grendel
davesaz (1): TiphaineDeath

Not Voting (4): Lavender, Almost50, a2rudeboy

I don't really expect Lav to even come back before nightfall. 50 and rude need to vote. Iec/BJ and Star/Gren either need to make incredibly strong cases or fucking move. Let's not no shred today, hm?

36 hours according to last VC.

VOTE: rude feels right.

NoPowerOverMe wrote:She's like trump and trying to sow discontent instead of unity.

Huh. And here I thought the media is what divided the nation. Was a single dude? My B fam.

In post 4415, chkflip wrote:ThOsE fOuR vOtEs B sO fAsT

That's how you sound right now.

MISREP ALERT

I am surprised that you were so quickly satisfied with a vanilla claim.

I thought that the latest dumb fads are excessive meta, bureaucratic claim procedures and

In post 4425, TiphaineDeath wrote:@CHK, my current theory is that at least 1/3 of you/NPOM/Pook is scum, and it REALLY doesn't make sense for me to vote on a wagon that the three of you start like that give that theory.

Right? And after a vanilla claim that took an eternity.

Why rude, over Grendel or A50?

In post 4435, DrippingGoofball wrote:I thought that the latest dumb fads are excessive meta, bureaucratic claim procedures and yeeting vanilla claims on sight.

I've literally never said any of that, so.

In post 4433, davesaz wrote:36 hours according to last VC.

Riviting addition to the conversation, dave.

You should write a book.

In post 4437, DrippingGoofball wrote:Why rude, over Grendel or A50?

Why not?

In post 4438, chkflip wrote:

In post 4435, DrippingGoofball wrote:I thought that the latest dumb fads are excessive meta, bureaucratic claim procedures and yeeting vanilla claims on sight.

I've literally never said any of that, so.

I didn't say you said that.

In post 4440, chkflip wrote:

In post 4437, DrippingGoofball wrote:Why rude, over Grendel or A50?

Why not?

The case on Iecerint is better.

Funny because Iecerint isn't one of the three names in that post.

So I ask again. Why not?

The current voting trend disagrees with you.

In post 3306, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Also the way TD claimed indicates he is scum. See looker's flip. He was a vanilla shredder not vanilla town.

In post 4349, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Anyways, I'm a town shredder and I feel like hyperposting makes it harder for scum to catch town power roles and easier for town night actions to go through. I don't see how revealing my strategy is helpful though.

The first quote is just the latest example but haven't you made several references to the exact wording of the Vanilla Shredder claim and yet when you claim you use the wrong nomenclature?

In post 4443, chkflip wrote:Funny because Iecerint isn't one of the three names in that post.

So I ask again. Why not?

If we're gonna back off a very important vanilla claim and turn to yeet some low-information rando after investing the whole day talking about other things, what's your beef with that particular low-info rando compared to the other low-inf0 randos?

Why are you trying to distract from the leading wagons?

Obviously my point was he didn't say shredder.

In post 4447, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Why are you trying to distract from the leading wagons?

Obviously my point was he didn't say shredder.

This has nothing to do with rude

Obviously why don't you argue for rude or iec instead of distracting.