Mafiascum.net

In post 4442, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:

In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"

In post 1108, imaginality wrote:

In post 1107, WhemeStar wrote:As the person who started brain celll wagon I like the gypyx wagon more

Why?

I find this sequence of posts interesting. Idk why you would ask Wheme that question when you yourself had already expressed suspicion on gypyx.

~I

To see if Wheme was bussing

In post 4365, MathBlade wrote: With all this rolestopping/blocking/things I would envision scum having a strongman

Did I misunderstand Dwlee's role, then? Like, if it stops a target from non-actions, isn't that just a roundabout way of being a oneshot strongman who can use their strongman ability on someone else?

-Truth

In post 4444, mastina wrote:Why Milobird, the slot which by meta is one of the towniest in the game? Did imaginality expect that a super duper secrit deepscum that was way out of their scum range would make the nightkill and risk being caught when they are super duper secrit deepscum that is way out of their established scum range?

My reasons for suspecting Milo were stated in #197 and #1589. It's fine that your read is different but it shouldn't be a surprise I targeted Milo given the combination of my suspicion plus the sense Milo was being overlooked in the discussion.

In post 4448, imaginality wrote:There must be some games where it would have been more beneficial for Pooky to bus scum D1. If it's just a case that he's not needed to do far, then why do people place so much weight on it? "Pooky has never bussed D1" feels fine to me in a way which "Pooky never busses D1" doesn't.

It’s not just on D1 either. I was on his tm team and he only voted out a buddy who had been hard guiltied but he is confirmed by Cakez to be co-vig and out of 5 possible suggestions he gave Pooky, you’re seriously going to argue that he picks his strong pr buddy, especially after already down one scum?

~I

In post 4182, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 4120, mastina wrote:

In post 4043, DkKoba wrote:HHAHA the leading scum must have targeted me ...
SO
I SELF TARGETED N2
my full ability:
nonconsecutive delayed rolestopper
essentially:
anyone who visits my target(i can self target) will be roleblocked the next night!
i self targeted night 2 - expecting to die or at least be visited by a scum

Uh.

I kinda doubt you stopped the scum kill, DKKoba, considering I rolestopped you N2.
If your rolestop on yourself is delayed until N3, I'm

pretty

sure that it should've failed due to me rolestopping you N2 and you self-targeting.

I'd trust whoever Gamma rolestopped to be conftown, no offense.

Well I targeted TIL so no paranoia should ever fall there at least

That’s probably the most likely explanation, they didn’t want Math inno’d.

~I

In post 4448, imaginality wrote:There must be some games where it would have been more beneficial for Pooky to bus scum D1. If it's just a case that he's not needed to do far, then why do people place so much weight on it? "Pooky has never bussed D1" feels fine to me in a way which "Pooky never busses D1" doesn't.

You continuing to push Pooky isn’t doing you any favours. He’s practically confitown for the one shot vig thing.

~I

In post 4455, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:

In post 4448, imaginality wrote:There must be some games where it would have been more beneficial for Pooky to bus scum D1. If it's just a case that he's not needed to do far, then why do people place so much weight on it? "Pooky has never bussed D1" feels fine to me in a way which "Pooky never busses D1" doesn't.

You continuing to push Pooky isn’t doing you any favours. He’s practically confitown for the one shot vig thing.

~I

Clearly not everyone agrees with you.

i think pooky's pretty clear at this point unless SirCakez is a godfather and they got an extra kill and killed their partner nope that's stupid yeah i'd say he's pretty clear

In post 4457, Save The Dragons wrote:i think pooky's pretty clear at this point unless SirCakez is a godfather and they got an extra kill and killed their partner nope that's stupid yeah i'd say he's pretty clear

this would be the most lit timeline ngl

In post 4451, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:

In post 4365, MathBlade wrote: With all this rolestopping/blocking/things I would envision scum having a strongman

Did I misunderstand Dwlee's role, then? Like, if it stops a target from non-actions, isn't that just a roundabout way of being a oneshot strongman who can use their strongman ability on someone else?

-Truth

I kinda just clocked out atm I have too much work. There’s so much in here I am ignoring mechanics especially if we get to godfather left only

In post 4448, imaginality wrote:There must be some games where it would have been more beneficial for Pooky to bus scum D1. If it's just a case that he's not needed to do far, then why do people place so much weight on it? "Pooky has never bussed D1" feels fine to me in a way which "Pooky never busses D1" doesn't.

PM the mod if you feel like trust tells are a thing.

Otherwise, I am chalking this up to defeatist scum.

In post 4456, imaginality wrote:

In post 4455, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:

In post 4448, imaginality wrote:There must be some games where it would have been more beneficial for Pooky to bus scum D1. If it's just a case that he's not needed to do far, then why do people place so much weight on it? "Pooky has never bussed D1" feels fine to me in a way which "Pooky never busses D1" doesn't.

You continuing to push Pooky isn’t doing you any favours. He’s practically confitown for the one shot vig thing.

~I

Clearly not everyone agrees with you.

Oh really? Who is disagreeing with me other than you?

~I

CHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

-chow

In post 4252, chowchow wrote:chowchow too lazy to sign because chow is on an island hunting anychow

chow is back so sign chowchow

-chow

In post 4463, chowchow wrote:

In post 4252, chowchow wrote:chowchow too lazy to sign because chow is on an island hunting anychow

chow is back so sign chowchow

-chow

Thank you so much for clarifying, I was seriously concerned.

~I

In post 4463, chowchow wrote:

In post 4252, chowchow wrote:chowchow too lazy to sign because chow is on an island hunting anychow

chow is back so sign chowchow

-chow

~chowchow

chowchow?
why is chowchow murdering chow?

-chow

Chow they are sleeping...
~chowchow

chowchowchowchowchow

-chow

In post 4469, chowchow wrote:chowchowchowchowchow

-chow

this wasn't chow!
impersonation is not very chow

-chow

why are you hitting chowself

-chow

why is this happening

~chowchow

-chow