Mafiascum.net

In post 4464, Chara wrote:4 days until deadline.
i can't figure out who Succinct's partner would be if scum, and i'm not convinced Elbirn is town in spite of his frustration seeming real.

on the other hand, if Succinct is town i feel she should be dead with a scum hammer. unless both scum are already on her? this needs more examination of exactly when and how long Succinct was at L-1 for but i don't have the time for that right this minute.

In post 4475, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4464, Chara wrote:4 days until deadline.
i can't figure out who Succinct's partner would be if scum, and i'm not convinced Elbirn is town in spite of his frustration seeming real.

on the other hand, if Succinct is town i feel she should be dead with a scum hammer. unless both scum are already on her? this needs more examination of exactly when and how long Succinct was at L-1 for but i don't have the time for that right this minute.

If both scum were voting town-succinct, they would have swapped to me by now for the hammer.

There pretty much necessarily has to be one if not both scum voting for me right now, otherwise I'd be dead by now

Why do you consider this PoV for succinct but not moi?

In post 4470, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4461, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 4459, Nimueh wrote:

I have a bad feeling that we’re going to lose this game because of Ank replace out, because no one will listen to me or Creature.

no, if we lose, it'll be because nobody listened to anybody, and we compromise near deadline on mislynches.

Yes, and I think we once again have tvt wagons. Succinct is a blatant mislynch and I’m thinking Elbirn may be as well.

In post 4474, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4465, Creature wrote:I think we have quite a lot to find Succinct's partner if she's scum, otherwise, if she's town I won't know exactly where to go.

But her partner wouldn’t let her languish at L-2 like that and never do anything to stop it - not in this setup anyway. And no one tried to stop it, which is why I would be legit shocked if she flips scum.

I think scum is NMSA/Skitter.

NMSA for that Flubberesque post and him wanting to end the game, even “if scum wins” and Skitter for suggesting that there is any world that scum!NMSA risks a ban on here, for blatantly game throwing.

In post 4475, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4464, Chara wrote:4 days until deadline.
i can't figure out who Succinct's partner would be if scum, and i'm not convinced Elbirn is town in spite of his frustration seeming real.

on the other hand, if Succinct is town i feel she should be dead with a scum hammer. unless both scum are already on her? this needs more examination of exactly when and how long Succinct was at L-1 for but i don't have the time for that right this minute.

If both scum were voting town-succinct, they would have swapped to me by now for the hammer.

There pretty much necessarily has to be one if not both scum voting for me right now, otherwise I'd be dead by now

Why do you consider this PoV for succinct but not moi?

In post 4476, tris wrote:

In post 4475, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4464, Chara wrote:4 days until deadline.
i can't figure out who Succinct's partner would be if scum, and i'm not convinced Elbirn is town in spite of his frustration seeming real.

on the other hand, if Succinct is town i feel she should be dead with a scum hammer. unless both scum are already on her? this needs more examination of exactly when and how long Succinct was at L-1 for but i don't have the time for that right this minute.

If both scum were voting town-succinct, they would have swapped to me by now for the hammer.

There pretty much necessarily has to be one if not both scum voting for me right now, otherwise I'd be dead by now

Why do you consider this PoV for succinct but not moi?

Only one scum can escape. If they hammer on you, the remaining scum still has to avoid a lynch the next day.

In post 4477, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4470, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4461, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 4459, Nimueh wrote:

I have a bad feeling that we’re going to lose this game because of Ank replace out, because no one will listen to me or Creature.

no, if we lose, it'll be because nobody listened to anybody, and we compromise near deadline on mislynches.

Yes, and I think we once again have tvt wagons. Succinct is a blatant mislynch and I’m thinking Elbirn may be as well.

Tvt wagons dont make sense here. Why hasn't scum finished one off?

In post 4474, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4465, Creature wrote:I think we have quite a lot to find Succinct's partner if she's scum, otherwise, if she's town I won't know exactly where to go.

But her partner wouldn’t let her languish at L-2 like that and never do anything to stop it - not in this setup anyway. And no one tried to stop it, which is why I would be legit shocked if she flips scum.

I think scum is NMSA/Skitter.

NMSA for that Flubberesque post and him wanting to end the game, even “if scum wins” and Skitter for suggesting that there is any world that scum!NMSA risks a ban on here, for blatantly game throwing.

I dont think scum skitter goes all in defending me from being mislynched when she could bump me off instead

In post 4475, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4464, Chara wrote:4 days until deadline.
i can't figure out who Succinct's partner would be if scum, and i'm not convinced Elbirn is town in spite of his frustration seeming real.

on the other hand, if Succinct is town i feel she should be dead with a scum hammer. unless both scum are already on her? this needs more examination of exactly when and how long Succinct was at L-1 for but i don't have the time for that right this minute.

If both scum were voting town-succinct, they would have swapped to me by now for the hammer.

There pretty much necessarily has to be one if not both scum voting for me right now, otherwise I'd be dead by now

Why do you consider this PoV for succinct but not moi?

In post 4481, Nimueh wrote:P.edit, @Elbirn, if scum is already on your wagon, then how can they “finish you off”? That logic, would also obviously extend to Succinct.

In post 4275, Chara wrote:i was scumreading Reck until he posted about rl. no longer willing to lynch him.

Spoiler: alt stuff

using alts to get around any kind of ban is definitely not allowed. i wouldn't say the game mod needs to know anything unless a ban is involved/you're on that mod's blacklist. i also don't agree anyone should have to reveal their alts.
though, if i knew a player had blacklisted me, and i was on an alt, and they replaced in/joined a game, i would probably let them know privately to see if they wanted to stay out of the game after all. and part of that is because i don't really want to be in a game with someone who hates playing with me, is all. i think i would be much less likely to agree to /out of a game i was in for the sake of someone else, because that's on that person, not me.

Elbirn because he's not in my pool of players i'm convinced are town (and i have reasons i'm very convinced or for all of them), and also because what i townread was something i still think is towny (the way his emotions came out in his reads) but that i don't think is unfakeable as scum.

i think his partner is one of the other players i'm also not locktownreading, but i don't know who, yet.

Succint's recent posting sort of convinced me they may be town.

but within the PoE it's mostly just 'feelings'. i'm only okay going with it because i'm so confident in who i have as town.

In post 4267, Chara wrote:pedit: i'm confident in all of my townreads besides tris, i think. so Elbirn/tris/Succinct/NMSA are the only players i would consider lynching.

In post 4488, tris wrote:I've decided that Chara is definitely not scum.

In post 4483, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4481, Nimueh wrote:P.edit, @Elbirn, if scum is already on your wagon, then how can they “finish you off”? That logic, would also obviously extend to Succinct.

But my post was working with the hypothetical of skitter-scum, who is not voting for me. Shes voting for succinct.

Also, to you, tris, and now reck who apparently think I dont know the rules of this setup, of course only one scum can escape. How hard do you think it would be for scum #1 to posture about and finally justify putting a wagon at L-1, and then scum #2 can hammer and escape? They've had fucking D A Y S to do so at this point. Why haven't they?

In post 4492, Nimueh wrote: So why didn’t they then? At times, both wagons were at L-2.

In post 4485, tris wrote:hmm, would scum!Elbirn be trying to convince me that scum is between him and Succinct? Wouldn't that be cutting off support for another counterwagon onto NMSA?

In post 4486, tris wrote:Unless of course he's scum with NMSA.

In post 4488, tris wrote:I've decided that Chara is definitely not scum.

In post 4493, Elbirn wrote:

In post 4492, Nimueh wrote: So why didn’t they then? At times, both wagons were at L-2.

Girl I know you didnt just answer my question by asking me my own question

In post 4462, skitter30 wrote:Why do i again feel like it'll be impossible to get 6 votes on succinct for no discernable reason?

@chara @tris why exactly are neither of u voting succinct rn?

In post 4496, Nimueh wrote:So my point is, that both wagons were at L-2, Succinct’s even got to L-1, albeit briefly, so my point is, why didn’t scum hammer either?

In post 4469, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4460, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 4456, Nimueh wrote:

In post 4443, NotMySpamAccount wrote:

In post 4427, skitter30 wrote:skipping past the multiple pages of nimueh posts that i'm not reading, fi there's something important in there lmk

nothing inportant besides nim screaming that I'm scum because I wanted this nightmare game to end

If you really wanted out of the game that badly, you’d just replace out, wouldn’t you?

Normally yes, but under the circumstances I don't want to force someone to read 170 pages of garbage while defending themselves from stupid arguments like yours.

Because I caught you.